Obama Not Only Palled Around With Terrorists. He's Now Arming Them

specklebang said:

I know the USA has often invested in very questionable actions and sponsored dictators and terrorists. But to specifically accuse the POTUS of doing so at the present time seems beyond unlikely.

I suppose that nothing is impossible if you look at our history. But the actions of the past must have seemed like a good idea at the time. What would the motive be for a President running for re-election to sponsor an attack on the US Consulate? It certainly didn't help him, the opposite really. But I'll listen with an open mind.

Click to expand...

Obama simply took the Bush doctrine of unilateral military action underground and receives complicit corporate protection by the US mass media.

Obama authorises summary executions of anyone in the world without trial - and that includes American citizens

Obama also allowed the NDAA to pass gtrhough his office desk without veto, and so now the US military can be used against US citizens (previoulsy an illegal action).

US citizens can now be held without charge indefinitely and even deported and have their citizenship torn up.

I really dont see any moral or ethical difference between any US president - especially on foreign policy.

Following this sort of path, always leads to blood shed and tears - there are historical precedents for this sort of imperial fascism - that now has an AMerican corporcratic flavour.

good luck in the USA