• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Luntz focus group sums up debate

You mean Republican pollster and consultant Frank Luntz? :roll:

That would be like James Carville doing a focus group.
 
AdamT said:
You mean Republican pollster and consultant Frank Luntz? :roll:

That would be like James Carville doing a focus group.
Click to expand...

Here's a thought... How about you watch it before making a comment?

I think you'll be surprised.
 
Yes, i am quite sure anyone who says Romney is going to win you would think is right. I could go down the road to the crazy wino who thinks obama put alien transmitters in his head and the alcohol and tinfoil are keeping them out and ask him and i am sure you would think he is right when he says Romney is the best too. Of course, he is a convicted felon and too drunk to find his way to the polling place to vote without a ride, like he says he got last election from some nice people who helped him to vote. Who knows, he was probably hallucinating that anyway.

Anyway, how does the underside of the bus feel?
 
Grim17 said:
Here's a thought... How about you watch it before making a comment?

I think you'll be surprised.
Click to expand...

I watched it. I wasn't surprised. Luntz is a Republican spin machine. That's how he makes his living.
 
AdamT said:
I watched it. I wasn't surprised. Luntz is a Republican spin machine. That's how he makes his living.
Click to expand...

Who cares about Luntz... I'm talking about the people in the group. You know, the people who overwhelmingly agreed with you that Obama won the foriegn policy debate tonight, and who overwhelmingly voted for Obama in 2008.

And btw, I find it amazing that you found and read both of my posts, watched over 10 minutes of video, and managed 2 responses in 11 minutes time... (the first just 3 minutes after I started the thread). You watched them all right... lmao
 
Last edited:
tererun said:
Yes, i am quite sure anyone who says Romney is going to win you would think is right. I could go down the road to the crazy wino who thinks obama put alien transmitters in his head and the alcohol and tinfoil are keeping them out and ask him and i am sure you would think he is right when he says Romney is the best too. Of course, he is a convicted felon and too drunk to find his way to the polling place to vote without a ride, like he says he got last election from some nice people who helped him to vote. Who knows, he was probably hallucinating that anyway.

Anyway, how does the underside of the bus feel?
Click to expand...

And you watched over 10 minutes of video in just 9 minutes... You people are good... LMMFAO
 
Bust them on their lie today, and watch fly away... I guess that's a bit more dignified than piling lies on top of each other like president hope & change does.
 
Grim17 said:
I think these people are a pretty good representation of America and although it was never said, they tell me that Romney is going to win this election.

Frank Luntz Focus Group On Third Presidential Debate | RealClearPolitics
Click to expand...

So because a republican pollster gets a set of reactions you like from one tiny group from one small area of one state that is unlikely to tip the election, you assume that you know how a too close to all election is going to go? ****ing brilliant!
 
Grim17 said:
I think these people are a pretty good representation of America and although it was never said, they tell me that Romney is going to win this election.

Frank Luntz Focus Group On Third Presidential Debate | RealClearPolitics
Click to expand...

Luntz! The fraudulent pollster and wordsmith! Lol! Ive even written a study on that guy. Boy, he's got some people eating out of his rhetorical hand. The power of words...
In 1997, the American Association for Public Opinion Research, of which Luntz was not a member, criticized Luntz for refusing to release poll data to support his claimed results "because of client confidentiality". Diane Colasanto, who was president of the AAPOR at the time, said
“ It is simply wanting to know, How many people did you question? What were the questions? We understand the need for confidentiality, but once a pollster makes results public, the information needs to be public. People need to be able to evaluate whether it was sound research.[20] ”

In 2000 he was censured by the National Council on Public Polls "for allegedly mischaracterizing on MSNBC the results of focus groups he conducted during the [2000] Republican Convention."
Click to expand...
- wiki
 
AdamT said:
You mean Republican pollster and consultant Frank Luntz? :roll:

That would be like James Carville doing a focus group.
Click to expand...

Everybody thinks they've got numbers to support them. People who put blind faith in polls remind me of numerologists.
 
AdamT said:
You mean Republican pollster and consultant Frank Luntz? :roll:

That would be like James Carville doing a focus group.
Click to expand...

No doubt. And "undecided" voters? roflamo
 
Redress said:
So because a republican pollster gets a set of reactions you like from one tiny group from one small area of one state that is unlikely to tip the election, you assume that you know how a too close to all election is going to go? ****ing brilliant!
Click to expand...

To be fair, there are plenty of liberals who claimed months ago, and still do, that Romney never even had a chance. Shoot, you got Tetereun over there claiming that believing Romney could win is tantamount, basically, to insanity. Lol.
 
X Factor said:
To be fair, there are plenty of liberals who claimed months ago, and still do, that Romney never even had a chance. Shoot, you got Tetereun over there claiming that believing Romney could win is tantamount, basically, to insanity. Lol.
Click to expand...

WANTING Romney to win is insanity.;)
 
Grim17 said:
Who cares about Luntz... I'm talking about the people in the group. You know, the people who overwhelmingly agreed with you that Obama won the foriegn policy debate tonight, and who overwhelmingly voted for Obama in 2008.

And btw, I find it amazing that you found and read both of my posts, watched over 10 minutes of video, and managed 2 responses in 11 minutes time... (the first just 3 minutes after I started the thread). You watched them all right... lmao
Click to expand...

Be serious, man. Listening to the comments, those people sound like actors reading a script.
 
Luntz is a sophist whose only skill is telling his clients what they want to hear.
 
AdamT said:
Be serious, man. Listening to the comments, those people sound like actors reading a script.
Click to expand...

so now you are calling those people liars because they don't agree with you?
 
AdamT said:
You mean Republican pollster and consultant Frank Luntz? :roll:

That would be like James Carville doing a focus group.
Click to expand...

Most of the people in his group voted for Obama. I saw them raise their hands.
 
Bobcat said:
so now you are calling those people liars because they don't agree with you?
Click to expand...

Luntz has zero credibility, based on his long track record and bald partisanship.

His panel of " undecided former Obama voters" after the second debate swung over 90% to Romney LOL ... He could have sold that after the first one, but that was overreaching to the extreme.
 
American said:
Most of the people in his group voted for Obama. I saw them raise their hands.
Click to expand...

And if it happened on TV it has to be true.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom