• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Who Won The Foreign Policy Debate, 22 Oct 2012?

Who won the debate?

  • Total voters
    123
Fisher said:
:fly: Psst....I'll let you in on a secret....tonight's debate won't matter unless someone goes batpoop crazy. It is all about the economy & jobs.....always has been. The rest is just partisan porn.
Click to expand...

Well, with the middle east on fire, and Obama having the Muslim Bros for dinner, it is a very important issue.
 
Amigo said:
Well, with the middle east on fire, and Obama having the Muslim Bros for dinner, it is a very important issue.
Click to expand...

Important but not important to an election....jobs jobs jobs jobs jobs......probably 99.5% of voters have decided, there are just some that need to come to grip with their decision before they say it out loud.......jobs jobs jobs.
 
Fisher said:
Important but not important to an election....jobs jobs jobs jobs jobs......probably 99.5% of voters have decided, there are just some that need to come to grip with their decision before they say it out loud.......jobs jobs jobs.
Click to expand...

Ok, lol! :)
 
Amigo said:
I know, he is so like, the messiah!

obama-halo-ap-new-550x362.jpg
Click to expand...


:allhail .
 
I like how before it even starts, Romney has apparently won according to one person lol.
 
Maybe it's just me but did Michelle and Ann look worn out when introduced?
 
Fiddytree said:
I like how before it even starts, Romney has apparently won according to one person lol.
Click to expand...

Oh, I almost forgot......Obama SUCKS! :mrgreen:
 
Bill O' says that unless Obama comes out the clear winner Mitt wins. A tie goes to Mitt according to Bill.
 
First question: Libya!
 
Obama is focusing on not looking at the floor again.
 
Romney will not have any problems in sending your son to war but not any of his precious silver spoon sons.
 
Obama didn't like that backbone comment on Russia.
 
Mitt slammed Obama.
 
Amigo said:
What you are saying is completely wrong. We Conservatives/Libertarians
Click to expand...

Conservatives are not Libertarians. Libertarians favor reduced government; konservatives support a candidate that favors ballooning the debt by $2 trillion for military spending that doesn't contribute to the US defense.

Libertarians do not.

Konservatives support a candidate that wants to spend even more $$ by arming Fundamental Islamic rebels in Syria, or dolling another $3 billion/year of welfare to the Israeli government, to avoid them having to take responsibility for its own security.

Libertarians do not.

Personal responsibility, not endless deficit-funded welfare to other countries, is what Libertarianism is all about.

Amigo said:
are not mindless zombies who think it's true because Limbaugh said so. Rather, we listen to him because he tells the truth
Click to expand...

Exactly, mindless zombies who don't recognize that his "truth" about limited government being equated w/konservative ideology (as indicated above) makes no sense.

Try again. For your convenience, I've provided your favorite source below. . .

rushcigar.jpg
 
Last edited:
Crosscheck said:
There hasn't been one Romney to serve this country in the military. At least Obama's grandfather fought for this country.
Click to expand...

His grandfather? :lamo
 
solletica said:
Conservatives are not Libertarians. Libertarians favor reduced government; konservatives support a candidate that favors ballooning the debt by $2 trillion for military spending that doesn't contribute to the US defense.

Libertarians do not.

Konservatives support a candidate that wants to spend even more $$ by arming Fundamental Islamic rebels in Syria, or dolling another $3 billion/year of welfare to the Israeli government, to avoid them having to take responsibility for its own security.

Libertarians do not.

Personal responsibility, not endless deficit-funded welfare to other countries, is what Libertarianism is all about.



Exactly, mindless zombies who don't recognize that his "truth" about limited government being equated w/konservative ideology (as indicated above) makes no sense.

Try again. For your convenience, I've provided your favorite source below. . .

rushcigar.jpg
Click to expand...

Misspelling "conservative" makes the credibility of your arguments equal to zero. Your post is silly, and utter nonsense. When we have a libertarian president, let me know. Then I'll pay attention to see if he does all that stuff you're talking about. Until then, you've done nothing. Most libertarians are sideline complainers whose ideas have never been voted into practice. Obviously no one likes your ideas. The other part of libertarians is they agree with liberals on being big potheads and drug addicts. It's all okay as long as you don't hurt anyone esle. Well unfortunately drug addicts are a drain on the medical system.
 
Foreign policy wha? Looks to be about domestic to me. I dont think this is what Schieffer expected as a response :p
 
American said:
His grandfather? :lamo
Click to expand...


Out of having 5 sons and including himself and father and grandfather how many Romney's have served?


If I had 5 sons and none serve I would feel foolishly sending someone else's son off to battle. But that is just me.
 
American said:
Misspelling "conservative" makes the credibility of your arguments equal to zero. Your post is silly, and utter nonsense. When we have a libertarian president, let me know. Then I'll pay attention to see if he does all that stuff you're talking about. Until then, you've done nothing. Most libertarians are sideline complainers whose ideas have never been voted into practice. Obviously no one likes your ideas. The other part of libertarians is they agree with liberals on being big potheads and drug addicts. It's all okay as long as you don't hurt anyone esle. Well unfortunately drug addicts are a drain on the medical system.
Click to expand...

You forgot to mention Clinton's blow job and how it destroyed America, and how a same sex marriage Amendment will save it
 
Last edited:
Crosscheck said:
Out of having 5 sons and including himself and father and grandfather how many Romney's have served?


If I had 5 sons and none serve I would feel foolishly sending someone else's son off to battle. But that is just me.
Click to expand...

So only sons should join the military? You do realize that your argument is specious. A man doesn't control where his sons go in their lives. This isn't the 19th Century. Your arguments are bull****.
 
solletica said:
You forgot to mention Clinton's blow job and how it destroyed America, and how a same sex marriage Amendment will save it

Konservatives are needed to entertain us :lol:
Click to expand...

Liberals aren't needed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom