• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Who do you side with?

You guys do know all you have to do is copy the URL when you're done with the "quiz" and paste it here and people can click the link and see your results.

You don't have to post your results via typing.

I suppose that would allow users to gain more insight into your political leanings and allow users to more accurately compare their own results with others.
 
Lord Tammerlain said:
Jill Stien at 89

BO at 83

Gary Johnson at 79


and Mitt at 44
Click to expand...

That's extremely odd...

Obama is the furthest thing from a libertarian, yet you're results conclude that you're closer to Obama and Johnson than you are Romney...
 
Mr.Nick said:
That's extremely odd...

Obama is the furthest thing from a libertarian, yet you're results conclude that you're closer to Obama and Johnson than you are Romney...
Click to expand...

I did not change any of the "How important" values and left them at the default which may be an issue.

Other then social spending I tend to be quite libertarian on most matter. While Mitt being part of the current republican party would be restrictive on social libertarian aspects while promoting only economic libertarian policies. It would most likely also provide less protection to national parks and the like which is why Stien came out on top
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom