• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

WTF? Tagg Romney owns electronic voting machines in Ohio

First of all, I haven't seen a credible source confirm these allegations yet. So I'm taking them with a big grain of salt.

Second, just because he has an investment in the company doesn't make it likely he will be able to influence the how the machines themselves work during the election.

But third, IF this is true, and even if there is no actual possibility he can influence the votes, it seems colossally stupid of Tagg to keep that investment during the election.

Guilford Co. voters say ballot cast for Romney came up Obama on machine | MyFOX8.com

I'll bet Tagg owns these machines. ;) :lamo
 

I don't think that's funny either. Voting machines should be accurate. Wouldn't it be simple to have an independent third party test the machines before the election? I don't want Obama getting votes that should have been for Romney either. Our elections should be 100 percent accurate.

I know some people think we're the United States and we always do everything as a model for the rest of the world, but that's just not true. We have a history of ****ing up elections. "Every person's vote counts as cast." How hard is it to live up to that?
 
Back
Top Bottom