• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Candy Crowley is a disgrace..

Travis007

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 13, 2012
Messages
13,375
Reaction score
1,611
Location
NJ
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Candy Crowley, who was suspected of being one more liberal moderator in the tank for Barack Obama, was more than just in the tank for him; she dove in and sucked all the water out for him so he could pretend he walked on water.

In the Vice-Presidential debate, Martha Raddatz, no slouch at shilling for the Democratic Party, interrupted Paul Ryan 15 times and Joe Biden only five.

Crowley made Raddatz look like an amateur. She interrupted Obama nine times, (although four of those were when he wouldn’t respect the time limit when discussing assault weapons; he went over his time limit all night long), but when it came to Mitt Romney, she was utterly beyond the pale.

Crowley interrupted Romney 28 times. 28 times. Her desperation to keep Romney from scoring points was so patently obvious that it wasn’t really a surprise when she had her infamous moment: the moment when she interrupted and falsely claimed Romney was incorrect in accusing Obama of refusing to call the Benghazi attack an act of terror.

And even beyond the interruptions, there were numerous instances where Crowley’s obvious partisanship prompted her to treat Romney with great disrespect:

1. She wouldn’t let him respond when Obama lied about the auto industry. First she called him Mr. Romney instead of governor, then protested, “there'll be plenty of chances here to go on, but I want to... We have all these folks. I will let you absolutely... OK. Will - will - you certainly will have lots of time here coming up.” Romney never did get the chance to respond.

2. After the question asking whether gas prices as they stand now are the new normal, Obama got 2 chances to respond. When Romney asked for his second chance, Crowley shut him off by saying, “ … in the follow up, it doesn't quite work like that. But I'm going to give you a chance here. I promise you, I'm going to.” She didn’t.

3. When discussing how he would deal with deductions, just as Romney was about to destroy Obama with statistics, Crowley jumped in to save her man not only by denying the value of statistics, but changing the narrative to say Romney’s numbers couldn’t possibly add up:

“And Governor, let's - before we get into a vast array of who says - what study says what, if it shouldn't add up. If somehow when you get in there, there isn't enough tax revenue coming in. If somehow the numbers don't add up, would you be willing to look again …”

4. When Romney was trying to make a point of Obama’s pension investing in China, Crowley cut him off by insinuating people were tired of him talking:

“Governor Romney, you can make it short. See all these people? They've been waiting for you. Make it short.”

Then she really tried to humiliate him with this: “If I could have you sit down, Governor Romney. Thank you.” She never asked Obama to sit down.

5. The infamous incident when she interrupted Romney’s claim about Obama’s refusal to call the Benghazi murders a terror attack:“It - it - it - he did in fact, sir. So let me - let me call it an act of terror...
Prompted by Obama to say it a little louder, Crowley obliged:
“He - he did call it an act of terror. It did as well take - it did as well take two weeks or so for the whole idea there being a riot out there about this tape to come out. You are correct about that.”

6. 6. Just as egregiously, when the question was about assault weapons and Romney naturally started to discuss fast and furious, Crowley quickly shifted him away from that and turned it into an attack on Romney’s assault ban position:

“Governor, Governor, if I could, the question was about these assault weapons that once were once banned and are no longer banned. I know that you signed an assault weapons ban when you were in Massachusetts, obviously, with this question, you no longer do support that. Why is that, given the kind of violence that we see sometimes with these mass killings? Why is it that you have changed your mind?’

The fact that Obama escaped all night long by lie after lie didn’t seem to disturb Crowley in the slightest. She had her shadowy agenda, and she stuck to it fiercely. Now it is our job to throw her out into the sun where every American can see exactly how dirty she is

Crowley Interrupts Romney 28 Times, Obama Just 9
 
Candy Crowley, who was suspected of being one more liberal moderator in the tank for Barack Obama, was more than just in the tank for him; she dove in and sucked all the water out for him so he could pretend he walked on water.

In the Vice-Presidential debate, Martha Raddatz, no slouch at shilling for the Democratic Party, interrupted Paul Ryan 15 times and Joe Biden only five.

Crowley made Raddatz look like an amateur. She interrupted Obama nine times, (although four of those were when he wouldn’t respect the time limit when discussing assault weapons; he went over his time limit all night long), but when it came to Mitt Romney, she was utterly beyond the pale.

Crowley interrupted Romney 28 times. 28 times. Her desperation to keep Romney from scoring points was so patently obvious that it wasn’t really a surprise when she had her infamous moment: the moment when she interrupted and falsely claimed Romney was incorrect in accusing Obama of refusing to call the Benghazi attack an act of terror.

And even beyond the interruptions, there were numerous instances where Crowley’s obvious partisanship prompted her to treat Romney with great disrespect:

1. She wouldn’t let him respond when Obama lied about the auto industry. First she called him Mr. Romney instead of governor, then protested, “there'll be plenty of chances here to go on, but I want to... We have all these folks. I will let you absolutely... OK. Will - will - you certainly will have lots of time here coming up.” Romney never did get the chance to respond.

2. After the question asking whether gas prices as they stand now are the new normal, Obama got 2 chances to respond. When Romney asked for his second chance, Crowley shut him off by saying, “ … in the follow up, it doesn't quite work like that. But I'm going to give you a chance here. I promise you, I'm going to.” She didn’t.

3. When discussing how he would deal with deductions, just as Romney was about to destroy Obama with statistics, Crowley jumped in to save her man not only by denying the value of statistics, but changing the narrative to say Romney’s numbers couldn’t possibly add up:



“And Governor, let's - before we get into a vast array of who says - what study says what, if it shouldn't add up. If somehow when you get in there, there isn't enough tax revenue coming in. If somehow the numbers don't add up, would you be willing to look again …”



4. When Romney was trying to make a point of Obama’s pension investing in China, Crowley cut him off by insinuating people were tired of him talking:

“Governor Romney, you can make it short. See all these people? They've been waiting for you. Make it short.”



Then she really tried to humiliate him with this: “If I could have you sit down, Governor Romney. Thank you.” She never asked Obama to sit down.

5. The infamous incident when she interrupted Romney’s claim about Obama’s refusal to call the Benghazi murders a terror attack:



“It - it - it - he did in fact, sir. So let me - let me call it an act of terror...



Prompted by Obama to say it a little louder, Crowley obliged:

“He - he did call it an act of terror. It did as well take - it did as well take two weeks or so for the whole idea there being a riot out there about this tape to come out. You are correct about that.”

6. 6. Just as egregiously, when the question was about assault weapons and Romney naturally started to discuss fast and furious, Crowley quickly shifted him away from that and turned it into an attack on Romney’s assault ban position:

“Governor, Governor, if I could, the question was about these assault weapons that once were once banned and are no longer banned. I know that you signed an assault weapons ban when you were in Massachusetts, obviously, with this question, you no longer do support that. Why is that, given the kind of violence that we see sometimes with these mass killings? Why is it that you have changed your mind?’

The fact that Obama escaped all night long by lie after lie didn’t seem to disturb Crowley in the slightest. She had her shadowy agenda, and she stuck to it fiercely. Now it is our job to throw her out into the sun where every American can see exactly how dirty she is

Crowley Interrupts Romney 28 Times, Obama Just 9

The only complaint I have with the Moderator is when she inserted herself as a fact checker into the Benghazi issue. First, she isn't there to be a fact checker. Second, she was wrong. Third, she admitted she was wrong after the debate. Fourth, she completely and totally let Obama off the hook by dismissing Romney's correct assertion that the American people were misled for weeks. She should be ashamed of herself.
 
Romney held his own debating against both Candy and I-Candy.
 
Ahh so that is the line of attack the GOP is going to use... blame the moderator for their candidates gaffes, mistakes and poor showing... gotcha!
 
The only complaint I have with the Moderator is when she inserted herself as a fact checker into the Benghazi issue. First, she isn't there to be a fact checker. Second, she was wrong. Third, she admitted she was wrong after the debate. Fourth, she completely and totally let Obama off the hook by dismissing Romney's correct assertion that the American people were misled for weeks. She should be ashamed of herself.

Transcript: Obama did NOT call Benghazi an “Act of Terror” in Speech from Rose Garden on 9/12/2012 « FactReal

Obama did NOT in fact, can the attack a terrorist attack in that speech. The moderator seemed to think he did and interjected her (wrong) opinion on the matter.
 
Ahh so that is the line of attack the GOP is going to use... blame the moderator for their candidates gaffes, mistakes and poor showing... gotcha!

Well when you have to debate two liberals not just one, you are a little out numbered. But even with a two to one disadvantage Romney won.
 
Ahh so that is the line of attack the GOP is going to use... blame the moderator for their candidates gaffes, mistakes and poor showing... gotcha!

I guess you weren't around for all the lamentations of Jim Lehrer. :roll:
 
Obama said "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation.".

How you guys just flat out lie and say no he didn't is telling of what kind of people you are. I understand the conservative lying for the lord websites tell you Obama and the moderator are wrong but, its still no excuse.
 
Oh, come on you guys...

She was doing a service for her country, don't you know? Obama obviously needs all the help he can get.
 
I'm not too worked up on the job that Candy Crowley did. Town Halls are a crappy format with the silly props on stage. If any of us were on there, we would be nervous too not knowing whether we would be called and then speaking in front of millions of people.

To the woman that asked the question then remembered that it was written on a note card, DUH.
 
Romney clealry tried to bully for more time right from the get-go and used the exact same tactic on Candy that he used on Leher in the previous debate......I'm not favoring either cadidate in how they treated Candy last night because both had some bad points but Romney set the atmosphere in the very beginning to clearly show he was going to do what he damn well pleased regardless of the moderator or town hall format.....I found him to be quite rude in a few of his interuptions and refusals to move on to the next question....he came across like a brat who always had to have the last word.
 
You guys are ridiculous. Candy did a great job. And on the the Benghazi issue, she was right to correct Romney.

"No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America."

If the president didn't initially believe that this incident was a act of terror then why would he say that? How come he didn't say a act of violence?

The best thing Romney could have done was leave out the rose garden comment, because at best he was not clear what he meant.
 
Candy Crowely jumped on the grenade for Obama.... what a complete shill..


would Seem Candy Crowley and Hillary Clinton , Definitely have something in Common, Right or Wrong, Stand By your Man,
and I am Not refering to Bill Clinton".
 
Obama said "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation.".

How you guys just flat out lie and say no he didn't is telling of what kind of people you are. I understand the conservative lying for the lord websites tell you Obama and the moderator are wrong but, its still no excuse.

You just proved Obama lied.. thanks for proving it.....priceless..
 
Ahh so that is the line of attack the GOP is going to use... blame the moderator for their candidates gaffes, mistakes and poor showing... gotcha!

Whining at it's finest. Someone else is always to blame. :coffeepap
 
You guys are ridiculous. Candy did a great job. And on the the Benghazi issue, she was right to correct Romney.

"No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America."

If the president didn't initially believe that this incident was a act of terror then why would he say that? How come he didn't say a act of violence?

The best thing Romney could have done was leave out the rose garden comment, because at best he was not clear what he meant.

so why did they go to the UN say it was a spontaneous riot due to a fake tape? and NEVER mentioned an act of terror?.. but apologized for some bogus fake tape?....


Obama will be impeached....period..enjoy the last days of Obamalot

which side of the mouth is correct for Obama?
 
Obama said "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation.".

How you guys just flat out lie and say no he didn't is telling of what kind of people you are. I understand the conservative lying for the lord websites tell you Obama and the moderator are wrong but, its still no excuse.

Yes, he did say that. It was a generic reference and did not refer to Benghazi. And for another two weeks, neither he nor the White House did anything other than blame the YouTube video for the attack. And that's the fact, Jack.

The first acknowledgement that it was not the video came on September 26th.

Here's our UN Ambassador in the time leading up to her final admission that it was indeed a terrorist attack. That final admission came on 9/26.

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice repeatedly said in a series of television interviews Sept. 16, five days after the attack, that the investigation at that point did not indicate a planned attack tied to a terrorist group. In one interview, with NBC's David Gregory, she described the attack as a "spontaneous reaction" to protests in Cairo inspired by the anti-Islam video. Several days later, the White House acknowledged that the attack appeared to be planned.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2012/10/16/white-house-takes-hits-on-libya-attack/1636623/
 
Romney clealry tried to bully for more time right from the get-go and used the exact same tactic on Candy that he used on Leher in the previous debate......I'm not favoring either cadidate in how they treated Candy last night because both had some bad points but Romney set the atmosphere in the very beginning to clearly show he was going to do what he damn well pleased regardless of the moderator or town hall format.....I found him to be quite rude in a few of his interuptions and refusals to move on to the next question....he came across like a brat who always had to have the last word.

what did you think of the the FOTUSA clapping for Obama during the debate..
and your post lacks any objectivty... simple Obama spin..
 
Whining at it's finest. Someone else is always to blame. :coffeepap

Like Obama could survice having Hannitty for a moderator.. like you wouldnt complain.... you fumbled your objectivity
 
LMAO... you guys are really desperate. You have to sink to the low of saying he wasn't talking about Libya... really?

The whole internet is rolling in laughter of how bad he got punched in the nose on this. Yet here at DP you guys are unbelievably trying to pretend it didn't happen. :roll:
 
The only complaint I have with the Moderator is when she inserted herself as a fact checker into the Benghazi issue. First, she isn't there to be a fact checker. Second, she was wrong. Third, she admitted she was wrong after the debate. Fourth, she completely and totally let Obama off the hook by dismissing Romney's correct assertion that the American people were misled for weeks. She should be ashamed of herself.

She was technically correct that he did use the word terrorism, but like Romney's misleading on oil production, saying Obama was upfront because he used the word is misleading.
 
You guys are ridiculous. Candy did a great job. And on the the Benghazi issue, she was right to correct Romney.

"No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America."

If the president didn't initially believe that this incident was a act of terror then why would he say that? How come he didn't say a act of violence?

The best thing Romney could have done was leave out the rose garden comment, because at best he was not clear what he meant.

Several days after that, obama stood in the hall of the UN and said several times that the attack was caused by the video and that is was a random act of violence. He did not want to admit that a terrorist act had killed 4 americans a month before the election.
 
She was technically correct that he did use the word terrorism, but like Romney's misleading on oil production, saying Obama was upfront because he used the word is misleading.

Romney was correct on the number of oil permits on federal land. That has been proven. Obama lied about it-------again.
 
Back
Top Bottom