- Joined
- Jun 10, 2011
- Messages
- 9,218
- Reaction score
- 5,860
- Location
- St. Louis MO
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
In response to a poll showing Obama ahead by 2% in Arizona a few days ago, Nate Silver tweeted this: "Although AZ poll very likely an outlier, one scary thing for Romney is that it included Spanish-language interviews. There's some evidence that polls which don't conduct Spanish-language interviews lowball Dem vote among Hispanics." I did remember seeing some discrepancy between polling and actual results in the Hispanic heavy southwest over the last few years, so I looked to see how the polls held up here the last few years. I used RCP's polling averages and only included the states that had been polled heavily between Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Nevada.
Arizona:
2008 Presidential- D+ 5% (Although it being McCain's home state might've had something to do with that)
Colorado:
2008 Presidential- R+ 3.5%
2008 House-4- R+ 5%
2010 Senate- R+ 3.9%
2010 Governor- R+ 9.9% (Although the three person contest between Hickenlooper, Tancredo, and Maes might've had something to do with this.
Nevada:
2008 Presidential- R+ 6%
2008 House-3- R+ 6%
2010 Senate- R+ 8.3%
2010 Governor- R+ 4.9%
New Mexico:
2008 Presidential- R+ 7.8%
2008 Senate- R+ 7.8%
2008 House-1- R+ 9.5%
2010 Governor- R+ 3.5%
Considering the polling in these heavily polled states is much worse than the national average it suggests that there is a problem polls have with polling Hispanics which these states are all heavy in. If you take the average of the misses in each of these states and add it to the poll averages in the states this election cycle it would put Nevada and Colorado out of reach for Romney and make New Mexico as blue as Massachusetts. If you consider Colorado and Nevada as blue states and if you give Obama Ohio where his polling has held up despite his deflation after the debate, then Obama would win without winning Florida, Virginia, New Hampshire, Iowa, and Wisconsin. If these polling trends continue this year, it could make it very hard for Romney to win an election tied in the popular vote.
Arizona:
2008 Presidential- D+ 5% (Although it being McCain's home state might've had something to do with that)
Colorado:
2008 Presidential- R+ 3.5%
2008 House-4- R+ 5%
2010 Senate- R+ 3.9%
2010 Governor- R+ 9.9% (Although the three person contest between Hickenlooper, Tancredo, and Maes might've had something to do with this.
Nevada:
2008 Presidential- R+ 6%
2008 House-3- R+ 6%
2010 Senate- R+ 8.3%
2010 Governor- R+ 4.9%
New Mexico:
2008 Presidential- R+ 7.8%
2008 Senate- R+ 7.8%
2008 House-1- R+ 9.5%
2010 Governor- R+ 3.5%
Considering the polling in these heavily polled states is much worse than the national average it suggests that there is a problem polls have with polling Hispanics which these states are all heavy in. If you take the average of the misses in each of these states and add it to the poll averages in the states this election cycle it would put Nevada and Colorado out of reach for Romney and make New Mexico as blue as Massachusetts. If you consider Colorado and Nevada as blue states and if you give Obama Ohio where his polling has held up despite his deflation after the debate, then Obama would win without winning Florida, Virginia, New Hampshire, Iowa, and Wisconsin. If these polling trends continue this year, it could make it very hard for Romney to win an election tied in the popular vote.