The facts you always use in your posts?
As if you've actually read my posts.
Like the "facts" that you used on your first post of this thread which were subsequently smashed into smithereens when it was revealed the the treaties that you had your panties in such a twist over were, in fact, negotiated and signed by Bush?
False - Bush, did not sign them. Another Romney'ism for you. The trade deals were sitting UN-signed by the President. How on earth can President Obama, sign that which has
already been signed? No wonder Bush 43, made it into the White House. He literally had people voting that can't even tie their own shoelaces.
It was Romney, who lied and said the President never signed a single trade deal - period. He made made no qualifications and he provided his audience with contextual substrate. President Obama, had to bring the trade deals before the Congress, to get the legislative process moving. Why would he need to do that, if President Bush, had already signed them?
You Romney, characters just can't level with the American People long enough to save your lives, can you?
It was only after that when Obama put his name on them.
Apparently, you don't even know what's going on here. How can President Obama, put his name on something that had already been Signed by Bush 43, and approved by Congress? Answer:
He can't.
Obama gets win as Congress passes free-trade agreements - The Washington Post
So to sit here and claim that Romney is lying when, in fact, there was nothing "new" about these treaties at all is not exactly a fact based position. In fact, I would call it nothing more than partisan rhetoric. Splitting hairs in an effort to manufacture outrage... something that I have noticed you have a penchant for as evidenced by your numerous posts in different threads.
Pretending to be ignorant is one thing - but being ignorant is quite another thing altogether.
Romney, declared that the President never signed a single Trade Agreement. Period. You can flop around and act like he never said that with tons of Video and News Paper evidence all over the net showing that he did, all you want. It won't alter the facts, but it will continue to make you look rather bizarre in your conclusion that Romney, said something different than that.
Second, splitting hairs is precisely what Romney, did in this case - yet again. He knew that Obama, had signed three (3) Trade Agreements that had been hanging around and held-up by the Bush Administration. Yet, he did what Romney, always does. He made the conscious decision to LIE about the facts that he knew were already out in the public domain. This is his MO. This is how Romney, operates and he's done it on a wide range of issues and topics as this thread will attest and as many other sites on the net will attest.
So back to your question...
Which is a question that you have yet to address without flipping and flopping all over the place, pretending that President Obama, did not sign three (3) Trade Agreements. And, you have also ignored the reason why those trade agreements got modified by President Obama. They did not contain Workers Rights Protections, until President Obama, forced the issue and got those rights embedded into the agreements. He did not sign them until those agreements were amended. That's something that George W. Bush, did not do and could have cared less about, as he was off blowing $3 trillion on illegal wars and Profit Sharing Agreements for Foreign National Oil Barons that supported his war efforts in Iraq.
Get your facts straight.
The answer is your facts don't back up your claims at all. Upon further review, they actually debunk them.
You walk in here and proclaim that a Trade Deal was
signed by President Bush, when NONE of the trade deals had even made it to Congress, and you insinuate that you've somehow proven something? You don't even understand the question, let alone have anything that you can debunk with.
You post a single FACT showing that Bush 43, had already signed what President Obama, signed and the congress approved, and THEN you will have debunked something inside this thread.
Until then, you are doing nothing more than what Romney, does all the time on the campaign trail, which is make stuff up out of whole cloth in broad daylight and hope that nobody catches him doing it. That's called outright LYING to the American People, and Romney, has been doing this since before he began running for the Presidency.
You've just been caught lying, just like Rommey. Now, how do you explain Bush 43
signing something that he NEVER signed?
opcorn2:
