Was that a threat?“When Obama is in the White House for a second term I'll take it all off,” she said
Was that a threat?“When Obama is in the White House for a second term I'll take it all off,” she said
Obviously.She obviously holds such an immensely powerful leadership position that I have no idea who she is.
It still amazes me that after George W. Bush that any conservative would have the gall to attempt to disparage any leader's intelligence. It might help me understand your point(assuming there is one) if you identified the person in the photo. She obviously holds such an immensely powerful leadership position that I have no idea who she is.
She's the head of the Democratic Party... Debra Wasserman-Schultz... You admitting to not having a clue who that is does two things... 1) It kind of shows just how irrelevant she is... and 2) it shows how uniformed and potentially irrelevant much of what you say has become...
So if I'm unaware of who an irrelevant person is, I am by association irrelevant? I don't consider a party chairperson to be of any great importance outside the realm of fund raising and I'd bet 90% of Republicans couldn't name theirs without consulting a reference. They aren't elected and their position is entirely one within the party confines. Unfortunately for the GOP, neither Bachmann nor Palin would be suited for this role since it involves speaking without appearing brain damaged.
No... I'm sure most educated voters and DP posters would know it's Reince Priebus (one of the worst names in history)...
However, it's more of an egregious error to not be able to name Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, from her multiple mis-steps with this election have kind of left the question about her brain capacity... so that last point of yours is moot as well...