• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Washed up old hag singer extorts her audience into voting for Romney.

We keep the cheer leaders on the sideline not quarterbacking or coaching the team.
No... you save the quarterbacking and coaching positions for the idiots.

65483_5_.jpg
 
No... you save the quarterbacking and coaching positions for the idiots.

View attachment 67135298

It still amazes me that after George W. Bush that any conservative would have the gall to attempt to disparage any leader's intelligence. It might help me understand your point(assuming there is one) if you identified the person in the photo. She obviously holds such an immensely powerful leadership position that I have no idea who she is.
 
It still amazes me that after George W. Bush that any conservative would have the gall to attempt to disparage any leader's intelligence. It might help me understand your point(assuming there is one) if you identified the person in the photo. She obviously holds such an immensely powerful leadership position that I have no idea who she is.

She's the head of the Democratic Party... Debra Wasserman-Schultz... You admitting to not having a clue who that is does two things... 1) It kind of shows just how irrelevant she is... and 2) it shows how uniformed and potentially irrelevant much of what you say has become...
 
She's the head of the Democratic Party... Debra Wasserman-Schultz... You admitting to not having a clue who that is does two things... 1) It kind of shows just how irrelevant she is... and 2) it shows how uniformed and potentially irrelevant much of what you say has become...

So if I'm unaware of who an irrelevant person is, I am by association irrelevant? I don't consider a party chairperson to be of any great importance outside the realm of fund raising and I'd bet 90% of Republicans couldn't name theirs without consulting a reference. They aren't elected and their position is entirely one within the party confines. Unfortunately for the GOP, neither Bachmann nor Palin would be suited for this role since it involves speaking without appearing brain damaged.
 
So if I'm unaware of who an irrelevant person is, I am by association irrelevant? I don't consider a party chairperson to be of any great importance outside the realm of fund raising and I'd bet 90% of Republicans couldn't name theirs without consulting a reference. They aren't elected and their position is entirely one within the party confines. Unfortunately for the GOP, neither Bachmann nor Palin would be suited for this role since it involves speaking without appearing brain damaged.

No... I'm sure most educated voters and DP posters would know it's Reince Priebus (one of the worst names in history)...

However, it's more of an egregious error to not be able to name Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, from her multiple mis-steps with this election have kind of left the question about her brain capacity... so that last point of yours is moot as well...
 
No... I'm sure most educated voters and DP posters would know it's Reince Priebus (one of the worst names in history)...

However, it's more of an egregious error to not be able to name Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, from her multiple mis-steps with this election have kind of left the question about her brain capacity... so that last point of yours is moot as well...

After defending the title sharing queens of not be able to open your mouth without looking like a fool, Bachmann and Palin, any viewpoint you have on anyone's brain capacity should be considered stillborn. You've made it obvious which head of the male anatomy takes over for you when a woman candidate or figure of prominence is involved. It's also obvious by your standards of feminine beauty that you will never need worry about being accused of any sophistication or even taste. Seems like you never progressed past that junior high crush on Kathy Ireland nor have you resolved the mommy issues from those adolescent years either.
 
Back
Top Bottom