• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Romney Says Peace Not Possible in the Middle East

Bronson said:
He's the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood

It's hilarious watching Dhimmicrats beclown themselves trying to defend Radical Islamic Fascists like the Muslim Brotherhood
Click to expand...

Dhimmicrats... thats spot on the target bro...
 
TheNextEra said:
If you can show me where Obama made a comment of whether peace was possible or not, please let me know.
Click to expand...

nice deflection, but you were questioning Romney's experience and I asked you about obama's. So tell us what international experience obama had before becoming president. Oh, I forgot, he lived in Indonesia and traveled to Pakistan. anything else?
 
Bobcat said:
nice deflection, but you were questioning Romney's experience and I asked you about obama's. So tell us what international experience obama had before becoming president. Oh, I forgot, he lived in Indonesia and traveled to Pakistan. anything else?
Click to expand...

There's no deflection, this thread is about the comment Romney made. It is YOU who are deflecting. Romney made a comment about peace not being possible. Can you or can you not show Obama making a comment like that? I thought not.

Plain and simple, Romney is not in a position to make an intelligent determination on that. Yet, you support that.
 
TheNextEra said:
If you can show me where Obama made a comment of whether peace was possible or not, please let me know.
Click to expand...

who cares what he says??? he took Egypt back to the stone age.. and that does not help peace.. period..
 
Bobcat said:
Yes, and he is also the head of the muslim brotherhood. Do you think he is telling the truth? are you that naive?
Click to expand...

He either will or won't support the peace treaty. So far he has, and in fact he is using Egypt's military to clear out Islamic extremists in the Sainai, along Israel's southern border.
 
I have to agree with Romney on this one. No US President is ever going to bring peace to the Israel/Palestine problem. The first efforts were somewhat noble, but at this point we're just jerking off. If they want to kill each other, fine, but as long as they're doing that, we need to pull all support from both of them.
 
TheNextEra said:
Romney made a comment about peace not being possible. Can you or can you not show Obama making a comment like that? I thought not.

Plain and simple, Romney is not in a position to make an intelligent determination on that. Yet, you support that.
Click to expand...

You can live in lala world....No Peace can be ahd without reality.. and Mitt nailed it.. the sooner the Palis know they cant get what they want without changing their charters and sesspool media and madresses and hatred, there can never be peace..period... who cares about words..
Susan Rice is an imbicile also...
 
Surtr said:
I have to agree with Romney on this one. No US President is ever going to bring peace to the Israel/Palestine problem. The first efforts were somewhat noble, but at this point we're just jerking off. If they want to kill each other, fine, but as long as we're doing that, we need to pull all support from both of them.
Click to expand...

Yea that makes sense.. lets pull support of Israel becaue they have a terrorist problem... why not pull it from every country then..
 
Surtr said:
I have to agree with Romney on this one. No US President is ever going to bring peace to the Israel/Palestine problem. The first efforts were somewhat noble, but at this point we're just jerking off. If they want to kill each other, fine, but as long as we're doing that, we need to pull all support from both of them.
Click to expand...

The comment wasn't whether or not a U.S. president could be peace, Romney said that peace was not possible period.
 
Surtr said:
I have to agree with Romney on this one. No US President is ever going to bring peace to the Israel/Palestine problem. The first efforts were somewhat noble, but at this point we're just jerking off. If they want to kill each other, fine, but as long as we're doing that, we need to pull all support from both of them.
Click to expand...

That's not going to happen, of course, and Romney has gone all-in with the "I love Israel more than you do" business. It's obviously a very difficult problem, but there will one day be a two-state solution. Throwing in the towel before election day isn't a good strategy.
 
AdamT said:
If Romney was REALLY being honest he would admit that Iran will get nuclear weapons if they want them, and there isn't a damned thing we can do about it short of a full-scale invasion.
Click to expand...

as you dont follow the real news there was a fire atht enuke reactors in Iran yesterday, so yes there are things Israel is doing along with Stuxnet virus that Obama made public like a MORON..

now tell me who is building the reactors for whom?
 
AdamT said:
That's not going to happen, of course, and Romney has gone all-in with the "I love Israel more than you do" business. It's obviously a very difficult problem, but there will one day be a two-state solution. Throwing in the towel before election day isn't a good strategy.
Click to expand...

yes..Israel and Jordan.. if you really had any idea on the subject the residents of the WB want JORDAN....and they will attack it again soon...very soon..
 
I'm getting a couple of chuckles out of this thread. Mitt comes out and states the coll hard facts rather than dance around it. Obama sides with those who attack our interests and then make a lame assed excuse for it. What Mitt says is true. I don't feel the need to get too involved in their conflict as it is not OUR conflict. As a nation we have offered countless solutions, suggestions and aid and it continues to do no good. It's time we just stepped away until they can come to at least some reasonable beginning of a solution, and stop throwing resources at it.

I'm surprised by those of you here who would side against Isreal if the reasons given are the real ones. Claiming that we should turn on them because everybody else in the region hates them is pretty out there. But at this point they could be very useful in helping to deal with the whack jobs in the area. I think they will be the first to take out Iran's nuclear assets, much better them than us wouldn't you think? I see their battle with Palestine as a complete waste, but their gripe with Iran is a potential "win" for us.
 
Travis007 said:
Yea that makes sense.. lets pull support of Israel becaue they have a terrorist problem... why not pull it from every country then..
Click to expand...
Because other countries don't refuse to comply with us while we fund their ability to exist.

TheNextEra said:
The comment wasn't whether or not a U.S. president could be peace, Romney said that peace was not possible period.
Click to expand...

And you think it is? Those people hate each other, and they've been killing each other for so long that reconciliation is simply not possible. The KKK deciding they love black people is more probable than a resolution in a region where a temporary ceasefire is the only peace they know.
 
TheNextEra said:
Wow, just wow. If this was a Dem that said this, they would be calling him a defeatist and loser.
Click to expand...

Hardly. It would just be astonishing that they told the truth.
 
tech30528 said:
I'm getting a couple of chuckles out of this thread. Mitt comes out and states the coll hard facts rather than dance around it. Obama sides with those who attack our interests and then make a lame assed excuse for it. What Mitt says is true. I don't feel the need to get too involved in their conflict as it is not OUR conflict. As a nation we have offered countless solutions, suggestions and aid and it continues to do no good. It's time we just stepped away until they can come to at least some reasonable beginning of a solution, and stop throwing resources at it.

I'm surprised by those of you here who would side against Isreal if the reasons given are the real ones. Claiming that we should turn on them because everybody else in the region hates them is pretty out there. But at this point they could be very useful in helping to deal with the whack jobs in the area. I think they will be the first to take out Iran's nuclear assets, much better them than us wouldn't you think? I see their battle with Palestine as a complete waste, but their gripe with Iran is a potential "win" for us.
Click to expand...

After more than 60 years of theft and persecution WHO would side with Israel?

They have recieved billions in US largess and have betrayed every US president since Eisenhower.
 
AdamT said:
That's not going to happen, of course, and Romney has gone all-in with the "I love Israel more than you do" business. It's obviously a very difficult problem, but there will one day be a two-state solution. Throwing in the towel before election day isn't a good strategy.
Click to expand...

A two state solution isn't a solution at all. All that does is put two nations at war, instead of nation vs territory.
 
A reason to vote for Romney is to try to at least slow down the absurd levels of "gotjas!" the media plays against Republicans - thus making accountable for nothing and he knows it.

Obama will say "my Muslim faith" and the only action of the media is to correct the sentence for him and innumerable extreme gaffs, even moreso Joe Biden. They just laugh and call it all inadvertant statements they didn't really mean. But if Romney says he intends to focus on manufacturing, the media will present it as "ROMNEY CAUGHT OT TAPE SAYING HE DOESN'T CARE ABOUT FARMERS!"

The next 49 days we will be hearing nothing but "Romney's next problem is..." with it being some nothing story.
 
Once again....a politician that actually makes a true statement. Hmm...I may be starting to like the guy a little bit.

There WILL BE NO PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST. EVER. People should get that reality through their little brains. As long as Israel exists there will be wars. As long as fundamentalist Muslims are feared and the topic is avoided at all cost people will continue to PRETEND it isnt a problem...but it will ALWAYS be a problem. Like it or not, the ONLY proven way to maintain peace in the middle east is to buy off Mullahs and have iron fist dictators that kill off fundamentalists that stir up ****. Throw in their access to oil...well...fuggedaboudit.
 
tech30528 said:
I'm getting a couple of chuckles out of this thread. Mitt comes out and states the coll hard facts rather than dance around it. Obama sides with those who attack our interests and then make a lame assed excuse for it. What Mitt says is true. I don't feel the need to get too involved in their conflict as it is not OUR conflict. As a nation we have offered countless solutions, suggestions and aid and it continues to do no good. It's time we just stepped away until they can come to at least some reasonable beginning of a solution, and stop throwing resources at it.

I'm surprised by those of you here who would side against Isreal if the reasons given are the real ones. Claiming that we should turn on them because everybody else in the region hates them is pretty out there. But at this point they could be very useful in helping to deal with the whack jobs in the area. I think they will be the first to take out Iran's nuclear assets, much better them than us wouldn't you think? I see their battle with Palestine as a complete waste, but their gripe with Iran is a potential "win" for us.
Click to expand...

Obama hasn't sided with those who attacked our interests. Romney showed that he will be horrible at foreign policy. He basically says peace isn't possible. That's not a good way to foster an atmosphere of peace in a troubled part of the world. I see no reason to side with Israel to the point of allowing Israel to rule our foreign policies. We should side with the country that is willing to help bring peace to the ME. Israel hasn't always been a good player in the peace talks.
 
Surtr said:
And you think it is? Those people hate each other, and they've been killing each other for so long that reconciliation is simply not possible. The KKK deciding they love black people is more probable than a resolution in a region where a temporary ceasefire is the only peace they know.
Click to expand...

Peace is always possible. At one point in time in history, people thought that whites would never accept blacks as equals. Things change.

The fact Romney is talking out of his ass is what is at hand now.
 
sharon said:
After more than 60 years of theft and persecution WHO would side with Israel?

They have recieved billions in US largess and have betrayed every US president since Eisenhower.
Click to expand...

Yes, the Jews are know as persecutors like how the persecuted people all across Europe for centuries and now, now, the persecute everyone else in Egypt, Iran, Iraq and the rest of the Middle East.

Why am I SOOOOO confident that you can not link to one message of yours about theft from and persecution of Jews? Hating Jews is pretty common including by white Caucasians now and for at least a couple thousand years.
 
TheNextEra said:
Peace is always possible. At one point in time in history, people thought that whites would never accept blacks as equals. Things change.

The fact Romney is talking out of his ass is what is at hand now.
Click to expand...
Please...expound on how you make peace with people that see this as an acceptable act...


Seventeen Afghan partygoers beheaded by Taliban

Officials say 15 men and two women killed as punishment for attending a mixed-sex party with music and dancing
Seventeen Afghan partygoers beheaded by Taliban | World news | guardian.co.uk

(if it would help to illustrate, I can post video)
 
TheNextEra said:
Peace is always possible. At one point in time in history, people thought that whites would never accept blacks as equals. Things change.

The fact Romney is talking out of his ass is what is at hand now.
Click to expand...


So your point is that Romney doesn't think peace is possible now, but hopes it will be in the future - BUT Obama does know peace is possible and has just been refusing to do so because???

There has never been peace in that region for its entire known history.

There is NO GOTJA! in any of this, but the media understands most people are really just sheeple.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom