Posting a poll from a Democratic leaning source, which admittedly lists 16% of the respondents as unsure, reporting a 10% lead for Obama, when clearly 47% is fairly close to the number that Barack Obama averages in most polls, where 37% is 8-10% lower than most polls have Romney at is just plain irresponsible...
Also, reporting MI as Mitt Romney's home state is also irresponsible. First off, Mitt Romney was born and raised there... but for 18 years. When Romney was 18, he went off to Stanford in CA. He then went off to France for 2 and a half years on his mission. Then when returning he moved off to Utah to go to BYU. Following his education at BYU, he moved to MA to attend Harvard. Upon graduation, Romney stayed in MA pursuing a business career. Romney stayed in MA for 28 years as a businessman, before going back to Utah, to rescue the Salt Lake City Olympics. He then returned and became Governor of MA. He additionally has homes in CA, and NH. While he was born in MI, he spent the majority of his life in MA, and more of his adult life in UT than MI. The truth is Mitt Romney is not of a single home state. Where we have seen Obama craft many policies particularly benefiting Chicago area factors, Mitt Romney would be an open minded president, representative of the entire country, not one select region. To me, that's a plus in his book.
More to the point though... both MI and MA have long standing traditions of heavy support for Democrats. Expecting Mitt Romney to win either would be insane. The fact that MI is even in play at this point shows the validity of Mitt Romney's candidacy and Barack Obama's failures. This is the state where Obama supposedly saved GM... if that's the case, why doesn't he have much more of a concensus of support there?
Just to put this in the appropriate perspective... the very same organization which put this poll out, had an entirely different breakdown 2 weeks ago...
2012 Michigan President: Romney vs. Obama
On 8/29 they released a poll from 8/28 of 1200 LV that had Obama 49 Romney 46 Undecided 5%...
Now on 9/13 they put out a poll taked from 9/8 to 9/11 of 600 LV with Obama 47 Romney 37 (no undecided... but 16% "unsure")...
So in a sample size half as large Obama lost 2% Romney lost 9%, and the "unsure"/undecided" grew by 11% odd how that works... care to guess which way the "unsure" voters would lean?
Why the change in option of undecided to "unsure"? Why half the size and taken over a longer peiod?
Either way... Pollster has an Obama lead of 4, despite that the last 2 polls taken were slanted toward Obama... in the only state where someone claims he saved an industry of theirs... that's not good...
BTW Obama won MI 57-40 in 2008... that's 17% it's now down to 4%...
Kerry beat Bush by 4%
Gore beat Bush by 5%
Clinton beat Dole by 13% (Perot taking 9% of that)
Clinton beat Bush by 7% (Perot getting 20%)
The last time MI went Republican was with Bush over Dukakis in 88... 24 years ago... largely based on Reagan's success and Dukakis' ineptitude...