• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Why is Obama skipping more than half of his daily intelligence meetings?

The President's Daily Brief is a report, that is sometimes presented in a meeting.

White House: Obama not skipping intel briefings – CNN Security Clearance - CNN.com Blogs



From the Government Accountability Institute's website:



LOL, this poor excuse of an "Institute" was established in May 2012. What a joke.

Government Accountability Institute | Investigating Government Corruption to Build a Stronger America

All that is debunked right here by the original author of the opinion piece.

And the PDB is not just some report sometimes presented in a meeting, otherwise he could just check his blackberry and read it there. The PDB requires human thought and interaction. He's hearing from his national security advisors who are giving him their take on the content of the matters at hand.
 
Yet, we hear that Bush could have prevented 9/11 because of a PDB given in August 2001. That is a good question being asked, why has Obama spent so much time campaigning, fund raising while not attending PDB nor even meeting with his Jobs' Council. What is it about liberalism that creates this kind of loyalty and what eactly is Obama getting paid to do?

The U.S. only needs to be wrong once to see thousands of Americans dying due to a terrorist attack. What was Obama doing that he could only attend half of the PDB's?

And what proof do you have that Obama is not getting the information?
 
As I asked before, do you think a meeting is the ONLY place Obama can get this information from? Remember Bush worked from his ranch, so meeting locations not so important.

Not if doing something else, no. Again, hence the reason for the briefing.
 
And what proof do you have that Obama is not getting the information?

What proof do you have that he is? He isn't attending the PDB's at least half the time so with this Administration and lies why do you believe he is getting the information?
 
All that is debunked right here by the original author of the opinion piece.

And the PDB is not just some report sometimes presented in a meeting, otherwise he could just check his blackberry and read it there. The PDB requires human thought and interaction. He's hearing from his national security advisors who are giving him their take on the content of the matters at hand.

The White House didn't dispute his facts, simply his conclusions which are really just the writer's opinions. Honestly, "W did it, so Obama should do it" is the best he can come up with? :lol:

W obviously needed the PDB spoon fed to him, hence the need for a daily meeting. Obama can read & comprehend the PDB on his own, therefore, he needs fewer meetings. If he has questions, or needs more info, he makes a call. Why tie up your intelligence resources, if they are not needed?

Bottom line, you and the author claims the president is skipping half of the intelligence meetings. This is false. Intelligence meetings and PDB are not the same thing. Again, the PDB is a report, not a meeting.

While the name of the PDB implies exclusivity, it has historically been briefed to other high officials. The distribution list has varied over time, but has always or almost always included the Secretaries of State and Defense and the National Security Advisor. Rarely, special editions of the PDB have actually been "for the President's eyes only," with further dissemination of the information contained left to the President's discretion.
Production of the PDB is closely linked to that of another publication, historically called the National Intelligence Daily, that contains many of the same items but is distributed considerably more widely than the PDB. Former Presidents are entitled to receive the PDB, if they so desire, only after the sitting President actually receives his daily briefing.

President's Daily Brief - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Last edited:
And what proof do you have that Obama is not getting the information?

Oh, he's getting the info, but by their own admission, he's not there at the meetings that are designed to fill him in on the significance if the info. He's analyzing it himself witout his national security advisors. Now, remind me, what national security experience did Obama bring to the presidency? What foreign relations experience?
 
PDB - President's Daily BRIEF It is a report, not a meeting.

President's Daily Brief - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You mean a report like this? and quite frankly it is both

PDB 12/4/1998, Subject: Bin Ladin Preparing to Hijack US Aircraft and Other Attacks The 9/11 Commission Report | 7/22/04 | CIA

The following is the text of an item from the Presidential Daily Brief received by President William J. Clinton on December 4, 1998. Redacted material is indicated in brackets.

SUBJECT: Bin Ladin Preparing to Hijack US Aircraft and Other Attacks

1. Reporting suggests Bin Ladin and his allies are preparing for attacks in the US, including an aircraft hijacking to obtain the release of Shaykh ‘Umar ‘Abd al-Rahman, Ramzi Yousef, and Muhammad Sadiq ‘Awda. One source quoted a senior member of the Gama’at al-Islamiyya (IG) saying that, as of late October, the IG had completed planning for an operation in the US on behalf of Bin Ladin, but that the operation was on hold. A senior Bin Ladin operative from Saudi Arabia was to visit IG counterparts in the US soon thereafter to discuss options—perhaps including an aircraft hijacking. • IG leader Islambuli in late September was planning to hijack a US airliner during the “next couple of weeks” to free ‘Abd al- Rahman and the other prisoners, according to what may be a different source.

• The same source late last month said that Bin Ladin might implement plans to hijack US aircraft before the beginning of Ramadan on 20 December and that two members of the operational team had evaded security checks during a recent trial run at an unidentified New York airport.

2. Some members of the Bin Ladin network have received hijack training, according to various sources,but no group directly tied to Bin Ladin’s al-Qa’ida organization has ever carried out an aircraft hijacking.Bin Ladin could be weighing other types of operations against US aircraft.According to [—] the IG in October obtained SA-7 missiles and intended to move them from Yemen into Saudi Arabia to shoot down an Egyptian plane or, if unsuccessful, a US military or civilian aircraft.
• A [—] in October told us that unspecified “extremist elements” in Yemen had acquired SA-7s. [—] >3. [—] indicate the Bin Ladin organization or its allies are moving closer to implementing anti-US attacks at unspecified locations, but we do not know whether they are related to attacks on aircraft. A Bin Ladin associate in Sudan late last month told a colleague in Kandahar that he had shipped a group of containers to Afghanistan. Bin Ladin associates also talked about the movement of containers to Afghanistan before the East Africa bombings. • In other [—] Bin Ladin associates last month discussed picking up a package in Malaysia. One told his colleague in Malaysia that “they”were in the “ninth month [of pregnancy].” • An alleged Bin Ladin supporter in Yemen late last month remarked to his mother that he planned to work in “commerce” from abroad and said his impending “marriage,” which would take place soon,would be a “surprise.”“Commerce” and “marriage” often are codewords for terrorist attacks. [—]
 
Yet, we hear that Bush could have prevented 9/11 because of a PDB given in August 2001. That is a good question being asked, why has Obama spent so much time campaigning, fund raising while not attending PDB nor even meeting with his Jobs' Council. What is it about liberalism that creates this kind of loyalty and what eactly is Obama getting paid to do?

The U.S. only needs to be wrong once to see thousands of Americans dying due to a terrorist attack. What was Obama doing that he could only attend half of the PDB's?

The PDB is a REPORT... And you will see from the link, it is a relatively short report. 1.5 pages.

Presdential Daily Brieifing On bin Laden, August 6, 2001
 
You mean a report like this? and quite frankly it is both

Why, yes, exactly like that. :bravo:

Bush even had a meeting about that particular one, but it didn't do any good, did it? Meetings are meaningless if you don't believe the people who are briefing you.
 
Why, yes, exactly like that. :bravo:

Bush even had a meeting about that particular one, but it didn't do any good, did it? Meetings are meaningless if you don't believe the people who are briefing you.

Is that why Obama doesn't attend his, but instead figures it out on his own (by his press secretary's admission)?
 
The PDB is a report given to the POTUS daily (well, maybe not this POTUS, but that's the issue of the thread). The paper PDB is the summary of what the advisors will discuss with the POTUS at that meeting.

LOL... did you just make that up?

I must admit, I was partially wrong... The PDB is no longer a paper report... President Obama gets it on an Ipad now.

That daily brief has traditionally been one of the most closely held documents in Washington, seen only by the president and his inner circle.

obama-ipad.jpg


Oval Office iPad: President’s daily intelligence brief goes high-tech - Checkpoint Washington - The Washington Post
 
Does daily intelligence really change on a daily basis?

Does the golf course change on a daily basis? I mean, the guy has spent more hours on a golf course this year than he's spent in either a security meeting, or a financial meeting. And that's no exaggeration, it's a literal fact......

He's been on the golf course over 600 hours this year, and in financial meetings less than 500 hours......

Man is a complete joke....
 
Does the golf course change on a daily basis? I mean, the guy has spent more hours on a golf course this year than he's spent in either a security meeting, or a financial meeting. And that's no exaggeration, it's a literal fact......

He's been on the golf course over 600 hours this year, and in financial meetings less than 500 hours......

Man is a complete joke....

In addition apparently unemployment isn't a problem either since he hasn't met with this Jobs' Council since January. it is a tough job, all that campaigning, fund raising, vacations, and golf yet millions of Americans still support this empty suit incompetent
 
Yeah! This is the guy we want to be commande in chief. Obama is more like the chump in charge.

Well if he were personally at every meeting the executive branch oversees, he would likely need about 10 more hours in the day. How did other presidents fair on similar stats? Throwing out a single stat with no comparison to past performances is hardly meaningful.
 
LOL... did you just make that up?

I must admit, I was partially wrong... The PDB is no longer a paper report... President Obama gets it on an Ipad now.



obama-ipad.jpg


Oval Office iPad: President’s daily intelligence brief goes high-tech - Checkpoint Washington - The Washington Post

Nope, you should read the thread, I linked to the info back a page or two.

Here’s National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor in Politico:

“The President is among the most sophisticated consumers of intelligence on the planet. He receives and reads his [Presidential Daily Brief] every day, and most days when he’s at the White House receives a briefing in person.”
Translation: Obama is so smart and so sophisticated that he does not need a briefer. He does not need an expert to walk him through the intelligence, answer his questions or dive deeper into the findings presented. Reading the PDB briefing every day, his people argue, is just as good as meeting in person every day with his intelligence officials to discuss issues. This is, quite simply, preposterous.
 
Cause it helps him kill people like Osama Bin Laden.
 
Is that why Obama doesn't attend his, but instead figures it out on his own (by his press secretary's admission)?

I imagine, Obama found daily meetings inefficient for himself and his staff, when he could simply read the report, then if he has questions, I'm sure he can have his entire team on video conference in less than a minute.
 
Back
Top Bottom