• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

DNC Chair Wasserman-Shultz Caught Blatantly Lying (Audio Proof)

Bronson

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 13, 2012
Messages
3,195
Reaction score
1,192
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right

This Wasserman Shultz Outrageous Lying is now the offical UNDECLARED policy of the Mendacious Obamarrhoidal Agenda since they cannot run on their CATASTROPHIC RECORD.

It is important to point out the latest OUTRAGEOUS LYING by Obama himself setting the tone.

That is why I will repeat my post from another thread to illustrate this new Obama Sub Rosa policy:

I am referring to Michelle, Obama's spouse's DNC speech as a lead in:

As usual, I agree 99.99999% with the Psychiatrist Charles Krauthammer's analysis.

Although Krauthammer didn't mention Michelle's true nature, i.e., one who was not proud to be an American until her husband conned his way into the Presidency, Krauthammer's position is that this African American Medusa had a superbly crafted speech REPEATEDLY hammering home the point that Obama was a caring person, a personification of Gandhi. No mention of his central characteristic: a ruthless lefty ideologue.

Of course, neither Krauthammer, nor I, were fooled even slightly by her excellent speech which was nothing but hyperbolic BS extolling a Monumental Mendacious, Racist Commie/Socialist Fraud.

BTW, what I found interesting is how Obama and his lemmings are sticking to their neverending Agenda, especially since it has been established by all the poll numbers as an UNMITIGATED CATASTROPHE. That Agenda being founded on the premise that OUTRAGEOUS LIES rule the day. And, there isn't anything more effective than turning the justified criticisms of themselves ..... and attributing these criticisms on their opponents magnified by Katrina-type proportions.

As stated above: Obama cannot run on his record. Obama's ONLY CHOICE is to LIE his way out of the CATASTROPHE of his doing.

A perfect exhibit of the LIEberrhoidal technique, enunciated above, was put beautifully into play by Obama accusing Romney/Ryan of saying nothing new, regurgitating the failed past. As Obama said it so comically (he is a fantastic orator) paraphrased (?): "one might as well have watched Romey/Ryan on a Black & White TV, with them thar "rabbit ears" !!!"

But who is, ACTUALLY, wallowing in the PAST since the present record of accomplishment is an UNQUALIFIED DISASTER ?

WHO IS THE ONE REELING FROM AN ALMOST 4 YEAR CATASTROPHIC RECORD AND FLAGRANTLY WALLOWING N THE PAST ?!?!?

Lessee...... WHO had to dredge up Barbara Jordan, a Negro luminary, the 1976 DNC Keynote Speaker ?!?!?

WHO had to dredge up the witty Texas Gov Ann Richards, the 1988 DNC Keynote Speaker who regaled her audience with the statement that "Ginger Rogers was as good as Fred Astaire but had to do it backward in high heels" ???

WHO is so desperate that he had to resort to getting a sex mad, but celebrated DEM ( as well as a hated enemy) Clinton from a PAST Presidency to save his bacon ?!?!?

And, finally: WHO is using a clip , some decades old, with the Paragon of Dem Morality, The Chapaquidick Murderer Ted (FATSO) Kennedy calling Mitt Romney something akin to being a MORON ?

How desperate must a Political Charlatan be, to dredge up a DEAD MAN to beat up his present Opponent Mitt Romney ?!?!?

Bottom Line: Just say NO to the Party of Broken Promises and CATASTROPHIC Change.
 
Look, normally I'm one to hold political creatures feet to the fire. But this is DWS. It is completely possible that the reason she didn't believe that came out of her mouth is because, on any given day, she has no idea what is actually coming out. Crazy is a legit defense here.
 
Look, normally I'm one to hold political creatures feet to the fire. But this is DWS. It is completely possible that the reason she didn't believe that came out of her mouth is because, on any given day, she has no idea what is actually coming out. Crazy is a legit defense here.

I have to say... she's one whacky character.
 
I have to say... she's one whacky character.

:) Hey, they had to put someone in the national spotlight to make Joe Biden look put-together. :)


People like DWS are the great silver lining of MSM bias - because they don't face the same assumption of evil and/or stupidity that Republicans do, Democrats have seen the most banal and least competent among them rise to the top. Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, DWS.... entertainingly to say, the most competent one at the top of the Democrat food chain is the guy with the least Washington Experience, who nonetheless is going to catch the blame for their screwups.
 
:) Hey, they had to put someone in the national spotlight to make Joe Biden look put-together. :)

lol.

I have to say when I see a picture of her, she's almost more like the democrats answer to Michelle Bachmann.
 
lol.

I have to say when I see a picture of her, she's almost more like the democrats answer to Michelle Bachmann.

Exactly, see. As soon as Bachmann went with the "vaccines cause mental retardation" bandwagon, she began her not-so-long slide from national prominence. DWS does something that stupid almost every month, and is still chair of the DNC :mrgreen:
 
No big deal.

Her boss has already established that the Democrats will lie...and get away with it.

I predict we'll see more lies out of that bunch.


You cant spell LIbEral with LIE.....

I hate the Dems more and more each day...
 
Look, normally I'm one to hold political creatures feet to the fire. But this is DWS. It is completely possible that the reason she didn't believe that came out of her mouth is because, on any given day, she has no idea what is actually coming out. Crazy is a legit defense here.

She blatantly lied about what a foreign dignitary said

She needs to resign
 
She blatantly lied about what a foreign dignitary said

She needs to resign

Obama will promote her.. DWS is a piece of ****..
 
This Wasserman Shultz Outrageous Lying is now the offical UNDECLARED policy of the Mendacious Obamarrhoidal Agenda since they cannot run on their CATASTROPHIC RECORD.

It is important to point out the latest OUTRAGEOUS LYING by Obama himself setting the tone.

That is why I will repeat my post from another thread to illustrate this new Obama Sub Rosa policy:

I am referring to Michelle, Obama's spouse's DNC speech as a lead in:

As usual, I agree 99.99999% with the Psychiatrist Charles Krauthammer's analysis.

Although Krauthammer didn't mention Michelle's true nature, i.e., one who was not proud to be an American until her husband conned his way into the Presidency, Krauthammer's position is that this African American Medusa had a superbly crafted speech REPEATEDLY hammering home the point that Obama was a caring person, a personification of Gandhi. No mention of his central characteristic: a ruthless lefty ideologue.

Of course, neither Krauthammer, nor I, were fooled even slightly by her excellent speech which was nothing but hyperbolic BS extolling a Monumental Mendacious, Racist Commie/Socialist Fraud.

BTW, what I found interesting is how Obama and his lemmings are sticking to their neverending Agenda, especially since it has been established by all the poll numbers as an UNMITIGATED CATASTROPHE. That Agenda being founded on the premise that OUTRAGEOUS LIES rule the day. And, there isn't anything more effective than turning the justified criticisms of themselves ..... and attributing these criticisms on their opponents magnified by Katrina-type proportions.

As stated above: Obama cannot run on his record. Obama's ONLY CHOICE is to LIE his way out of the CATASTROPHE of his doing.

A perfect exhibit of the LIEberrhoidal technique, enunciated above, was put beautifully into play by Obama accusing Romney/Ryan of saying nothing new, regurgitating the failed past. As Obama said it so comically (he is a fantastic orator) paraphrased (?): "one might as well have watched Romey/Ryan on a Black & White TV, with them thar "rabbit ears" !!!"

But who is, ACTUALLY, wallowing in the PAST since the present record of accomplishment is an UNQUALIFIED DISASTER ?

WHO IS THE ONE REELING FROM AN ALMOST 4 YEAR CATASTROPHIC RECORD AND FLAGRANTLY WALLOWING N THE PAST ?!?!?

Lessee...... WHO had to dredge up Barbara Jordan, a Negro luminary, the 1976 DNC Keynote Speaker ?!?!?

WHO had to dredge up the witty Texas Gov Ann Richards, the 1988 DNC Keynote Speaker who regaled her audience with the statement that "Ginger Rogers was as good as Fred Astaire but had to do it backward in high heels" ???

WHO is so desperate that he had to resort to getting a sex mad, but celebrated DEM ( as well as a hated enemy) Clinton from a PAST Presidency to save his bacon ?!?!?

And, finally: WHO is using a clip , some decades old, with the Paragon of Dem Morality, The Chapaquidick Murderer Ted (FATSO) Kennedy calling Mitt Romney something akin to being a MORON ?

How desperate must a Political Charlatan be, to dredge up a DEAD MAN to beat up his present Opponent Mitt Romney ?!?!?

Bottom Line: Just say NO to the Party of Broken Promises and CATASTROPHIC Change.

What the hell kind of debate is this? This sort of drivel doesn't deserve a response.

BTW, Hoong Loong, I am no Obamaphile and I think there mare many serious criticisms that can be laid at him. I've never been a fan of bashing a politician's family, and I resent this attack on the First Lady (which came across as purely racist, BTW, in case you care).

 
What the hell kind of debate is this? This sort of drivel doesn't deserve a response.

BTW, Hoong Loong, I am no Obamaphile and I think there mare many serious criticisms that can be laid at him. I've never been a fan of bashing a politician's family, and I resent this attack on the First Lady (which came across as purely racist, BTW, in case you care).


wheres the racism?????? gimme a break... thats so weak ...
 
wheres the racism?????? gimme a break... thats so weak ...

Hoong Long wrote in part:

Although Krauthammer didn't mention Michelle's true nature, i.e., one who was not proud to be an American until her husband conned his way into the Presidency, Krauthammer's position is that this African American Medusa had a superbly crafted speech REPEATEDLY hammering home the point that Obama was a caring person, a personification of Gandhi. No mention of his central characteristic: a ruthless lefty ideologue.

Seems fairly obvious to me -- and BTW, it derailed this thread, in which I might instead have enjoyed bashing DWS.
 
Hoong Long wrote in part:



Seems fairly obvious to me -- and BTW, it derailed this thread, in which I might instead have enjoyed bashing DWS.

nothing racist there..
 
nothing racist there..

Another threadjack -- you don't see it and I do.

None of which has any bearing on DWS' bad behavior.

At the very least, you might try admitting that what Hoong Loong wrote did nothing to advance the debate about DWS' misconduct.
 
Obama is black.


OK... Guess that means I'm a racist now.
 
What the hell kind of debate is this? This sort of drivel doesn't deserve a response.

BTW, Hoong Loong, I am no Obamaphile and I think there mare many serious criticisms that can be laid at him. I've never been a fan of bashing a politician's family, and I resent this attack on the First Lady (which came across as purely racist, BTW, in case you care).


See my following post.

You are both ridiculous and pathetic.
 
Last edited:
You must be some sort of phenomenon from outer space if you think that criticizingpoliticall statements of the wife of a politico who claims "she is not proud to be an American" is racism.

You are both ridiculous and pathetic.

First, I kinda resent being deprived of any opportunity to bash DWS. IMO, it is bad manners to threadjack as blatantly as you did. Second, you referred to our First Lady as "an African American Medusa". I didn't think you'd care that you seemed to be using racist speech, but I mentioned it anyway on the off-chance you'd like to improve.
 
Last edited:
Obama is black.


OK... Guess that means I'm a racist now.

Not just because you noticed Obama is black, Grim. However, if you respond to every Op that contains the word "Democrat" with a diatribe about his "African ancestry", his "communist sympathies", his "Muslim religious affiliation", etc., then yes.
 
What the hell kind of debate is this? This sort of drivel doesn't deserve a response.

BTW, Hoong Loong, I am no Obamaphile and I think there mare many serious criticisms that can be laid at him. I've never been a fan of bashing a politician's family, and I resent this attack on the First Lady (which came across as purely racist, BTW, in case you care).


DWS flagrant LYING simply follows the example set by the LIAR-in-Chief and his Un-American Spouse. And, using this fact to illustrate that this is Standard Operating Procedure of an Administration that has no choice but to LIE itself out of the CATASTROPHIC record of its failed Agenda.

I don't know which planet you beamed down from, or which plant you evolved from, but criticizing the wife of a politico who makes a political speech, ipso facto, is not RACISM !!!

Especially one that proclaimed that she "is not proud of being an American" ....... until her husband got the Presidency.

As far as calling this abomination an "African American Medusa": anyone that slanders America when in the position of the greatest trust of Americans should consider this label as a kindness.

And there isn't anything that prevents you from bashing DWS except your own restriction probably used as a convenient ploy not to for ideological reasons.
 
Last edited:
DWS flagrant LYING simply follows the example set by the LIAR-in-Chief and his Un-American Spouse.

O, I imagine the habit of lying was ingrained in DWS long before she ever heard of Obama.

And, using this fact to illustrate that this is Standard Operating Procedure of an Administration that has no choice but to LIE itself out of the CATASTROPHIC record of its failed Agenda.

I don't think you are connecting up the dots too well here. What catastrophe is supposedly being hidden by lies told by DWS?

I don't know which planet you beamed down from, or which plant you evolved from, but criticizing the wife of a politico who makes a political speech, ipso facto, is not RACISM !!!

When you attack a black woman who is First Lady for being black, that's racist.

Especially one that proclaimed that she "is not proud of being an American" ....... until her husband got the Presidency.

What stupendous grasp of the nuances of speech you've shown here, Hoong Loong.

 
Obama is black.


OK... Guess that means I'm a racist now.

"African American Medusa"

I stopped reading your diatribe at that point... wtf dude.

WTF, Dude ..... you are free to stop reading anything for whatever reason you wish. That is of monumental disinterest to me.

The reason for my comment is merely to show my politeness in that I am not impressed with your crap and I am warning you from making the mistake of wasting your time in the future.
 
O, I imagine the habit of lying was ingrained in DWS long before she ever heard of Obama.

MY RESPONSE:

Probably.

That probability probably made DWS the perfect choice for being the Chairman of the DNC.



I don't think you are connecting up the dots too well here. What catastrophe is supposedly being hidden by lies told by DWS?

MY RESPONSE:

You are entitled to any idiotic opinion you want.

What hidden "catastrophe" ? There isn't anything "hidden" about Obama's Catastrophic Agenda ...... the Agenda that the Mendacious DWS as Chairman of the DNC is.



When you attack a black woman who is First Lady for being black, that's racist.

MY RESPONSE:

Attacking a black, or any coloured woman ..... including pink ones ....when they are INGRATES....and impugn America ...... especially when placed into the position of highest trust ...... is actually the duty of patriotic Americans.

If you are not perceptive enough to realize that this unAmerican abomination was criticized regardless of her colour, then that obvious fault is your problem.



What stupendous grasp of the nuances of speech you've shown here, Hoong Loong.

MY RESPONSE:

Considering your ability to perceive REALITY, I don't consider your compliment worth a dog's fart.


See above for MY RESPONSES.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom