- Joined
- Mar 11, 2006
- Messages
- 96,099
- Reaction score
- 33,418
- Location
- SE Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Yes, and unfortunately there's an empty suit sittiing in it.
Polished sounded bites taken from movies in context are very effective in campaigns. Eastwood did a Hollywood type exercise in the political arena. It was a poor choice by both Eastwood and the Romney campaign.
Thats the truly sad part. They have to provide photographic evidence in order for people to actually know the difference. Empty or taken, unemployment is still a huge problem. Debt and annual deficits are still a huge problem. There is still a vacuum in foreign policy leadership or for that matter leadership of any type. Hell...beyond he annual fluff NCAA March Madness picks...we got nothing...Yes, and unfortunately there's an empty suit sittiing in it.
Don't be so sure, my friend.
Umm, no, he didn't. He was actually just talking to an empty chair. He didn't sit anyone down.Clint Eastwood is an American Icon and he sat the boy narcissist president down and handled business
If the guy did this at the DNC, y'all would have thought he was brilliant. Stop pretending.
BTW, did anybody else see the teleprompters? I thought onlyh Obama used them, so they certainly wouldn't be needed at the Republican convention.
You're crazy, you're absolutely crazy.
I have seen a few speeches about Romney, and sorry, not one of the keynote speeches I have seen seem passionate about Romney. Not even the parts I have seen from his wifes speech. Maybe it was in the parts I did not see but it may have been a loving speech but passionate? No.
Yeah, totally called for. :roll:
Thats the truly sad part. They have to provide photographic evidence in order for people to actually know the difference. Empty or taken, unemployment is still a huge problem. Debt and annual deficits are still a huge problem. There is still a vacuum in foreign policy leadership or for that matter leadership of any type. Hell...beyond he annual fluff NCAA March Madness picks...we got nothing...
The obama slurpers are upset-Clint was funny and far sharper at 82 than the brain dead Obama toadies in hollywood who support Obama so they can pretend to be "enlightened" and not feel bad about having more affairs than acting roles
All politicians use them. Obama got dinged when he used one in front of a bunch of students at an elementary school.
I didn't watch any coverage last night and reading through this thread piqued my curiosity. After reading some of the posts I was expecting to see a mindless buffoon playing to an audience aghast with a collective embarrassment written all over their faces and dead silence. After watching the performance I would have to say that most of the criticism has been GREATLY exaggerated. It wasn't any where near as bad as it is being made out to be. I wouldn't call it "good" but c'mon, man. It doesn't rise anywhere near the level of awful that it is being made out to be.
If this is the best reason you can come up with to call the convention a failure then I would have to say that desperation must be setting in...
What was the Romney camp thinking, letting an 82 year old actor ad lib at 10:00pm on the last day of the convention. This will eat into what should have been a Friday news day dominated by Romney coverage... Now it will be split 50/50 with Eastwood coverage.
It shows a severe lack of judgement by the team Romney selected to manage the convention, which reflects badly on Romney's judgement. Seriously, someone should have put a stop to that idea, or at least moved Clint to the 4:30pm slot.
I imagine Romney's team had delusions of something simillar to the Super Bowl Half time spot Eastwood narrated... but that was a professionally written and produced piece, and probably took Eastwood 50 takes to get right.
It's was just astonishing what happened tonight.
Ummmm, you got your panties in a wad about an actor? Seriously? :lol:
I suspect the twisting panties are encroaching upon the nether regions of the GOP braintrust who came up with this less than stellar idea.
So you think Eastwood helped both himself and Romney by pronouncing the President of the USA as CRAZY - not once but twice?
I'm embarrassed for Eastwood.