• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

"you didn't build it" the real meaning [W:838]

I was just curious how a true marxist might act were he ever to gain the presidency.

Most marxists that have ever come to power have done so through violent revolution.

Far as I'm aware there have been very few marxist governments elected to power but when they are, they are extremely plain about who they are and what they plan to do.

To go back to the point though from the other post, the idea that Obama is a secret marxist is idiotic beyond belief.
 
Like honestly, there is such a disconnect here between reality and the partisan fantasy world you live in it's not even funny.

First of all, a true marxist would have taken complete power and confiscated all wealth by use of force... this has not and will not occur.
Marxist European socialism can come through the use of immediate force or, as in the US case, more gradually. This time Marxism is coming in using fascistic practices. We have a massive regulatory state that intrudes into every aspect of our lives. Every aspect. The government has its tentacles into every part of every business. Every day the private sector is being both smothered and controlled by ever greater numbers of regulations and regulators. If we do not fight back we will lose the country.

Second of all a marxist would have imprisoned all political enemies of the nation, to them of course that being you and even me.
Marxism does not have to be imposed through the immediate use of force. Tyranny will come in like a morning fog.

Thirdly a marxist would have no need for an election and as I said earlier no need for a house of representatives or a senate to approve his tax hikes, it would just be done and furthermore as I said earlier there'd be no need for taxes... it's just be confiscated.
You behave as if the one term Marxist flexible president has already succeeded. He has not. But he has put into place the forces necessary to move this country under administrative tyranny. Some call this soft tyranny. Hard tyranny where people are put into prisons or murdered may or may not follow.

If you're seriously going to insinuate that raising the wealthiest Americans taxes by a few percentage points is "marxism" than I really fear for your state of mind.
You are already ripe for the picking.

The America you envision is un-American.
 
For the record, I am not accusing Obama of being a marxist. I was just curious how a true marxist might act were he ever to gain the presidency.
No need to accuse him. Read the books he claims to have written.

He spent his formative years in the presence of a socialists, Marxists, radicals, and Progressives. He spent his formative year in Indonesia steeped in Islam.

In two months the error will be corrected.
 
Most marxists that have ever come to power have done so through violent revolution.
And some have not.

Far as I'm aware there have been very few marxist governments elected to power but when they are, they are extremely plain about who they are and what they plan to do.
What do you believe the one term Marxist flexible president Barrack Hussein Obama meant when he said he intended to fundamentally transform America?

To go back to the point though from the other post, the idea that Obama is a secret marxist is idiotic beyond belief.
Were you expecting him to announce it? Must others do everything for you?
 
Marxist European socialism can come through the use of immediate force or, as in the US case, more gradually. This time Marxism is coming in using fascistic practices. We have a massive regulatory state that intrudes into every aspect of our lives. Every aspect. The government has its tentacles into every part of every business. Every day the private sector is being both smothered and controlled by ever greater numbers of regulations and regulators. If we do not fight back we will lose the country.


Marxism does not have to be imposed through the immediate use of force. Tyranny will come in like a morning fog.


You behave as if the one term Marxist flexible president has already succeeded. He has not. But he has put into place the forces necessary to move this country under administrative tyranny. Some call this soft tyranny. Hard tyranny where people are put into prisons or murdered may or may not follow.


You are already ripe for the picking.

The America you envision is un-American.

Folks.

This is paranoia.
 
One way, seems to me would be in the Fed continuing to buy more and more of our own debt.

Because....

How does that harm small business? At least in the past 3.5 years?

You still never learned how to support your assertions have you? WS was back in 2005 man. Grow up.
 
This isn't the whole speech but at least gives some context. Given the two paragraphs he's saying if you're rich odd are you've got a bit of luck and a lot of help along the way. The sentence was probably a slip up and came out miss worded. Most likely he meant to say "you didn't build that on your own" instead of "you didn't build that" which is supported by the rest of the two paragraphs.

It's hardly "demonizing" business owners

"There are a lot of wealthy, successful Americans who agree with me — because they want to give something back. They know they didn't — look, if you've been successful, you didn't get there on your own. I'm always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something — there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there.

If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you've got a business — you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn't get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet."

By the way the internet did start out as a tool for the CIA.

I hope a moderator could put the two paragraphs in or after the OP (original post).
 
Last edited:
If you're seriously going to insinuate that raising the wealthiest Americans taxes by a few percentage points is "marxism" than I really fear for your state of mind.

It is the election season.

The more partisan you are the less critical thinking you do. And if you're a hardcore partisan, that really isn't something that occurs often anyways.

Election season brings out the worst in nonthinking partisans.

Delusions and paranoia are being passed around as normal beliefs.

That said, Misterveritis has always been like that. Everything he dislikes is a massive government wide Marxist conspiracy to take over the world.
 
For the record, I am not accusing Obama of being a marxist. I was just curious how a true marxist might act were he ever to gain the presidency.

A true Marxist would never seek the Presidency. That would be a wholesale abandonment of Marxism. To seek and achieve the Presidency would mean the acceptance and use of the capitalist class structure society. Essentially a Marxist President would be tearing up everything they believed in. If you are a true Marxist, how can you literally abandon your beliefs and still be a Marxist?

Marxism never seeks to change the political structure from within. It always overthrows it. Seeking the Presidency completely perverts what Marxism is.

Misterveritis's problem is that he defines Marxism as anything he dislikes and anything self proclaimed Communists have done. It's an exceedingly stupid definition.
 
That's true, but you haven't actually cited an actual example of where Obama didn't do much for small business. Where Obama has failed actually to help small business is failing to fix the housing market. That is bringing down consumer spending which is directly harming business in general.

Since j-mac can't prove a negative, hows about you cite examples of how Obama helped small businesses.

The drilling ban and stalling the Keystone pipeline hurt thousands of small businesses.
 
Since j-mac can't prove a negative, hows about you cite examples of how Obama helped small businesses.

The drilling ban and stalling the Keystone pipeline hurt thousands of small businesses.

http://www.debatepolitics.com/2012-...d-real-meaning-w-838-a-84.html#post1060881663

Try to post again with less fail. I know it's hard, but try.

You either are uber lazy or you can't read properly. Which is it?

Actual jobs created on the proposed pipeline wouldn't even break 2,000 by the company's own measure.
 
Alex..What is "obamas response to 9/11" if he was God forbid our President on 9/11."

He would have appologized to the taliban for putting our buildings in front of the planes they hijacked. Then he would have sent a few billion over to the muslims because we have been pissing them off for years.
 
He would have appologized to the taliban for putting our buildings in front of the planes they hijacked. Then he would have sent a few billion over to the muslims because we have been pissing them off for years.

excatly... Im sure with little vetting we can find 9/11 truthers in Obama's inner circle of idgits..

but think about this..if Obama was President on 9/11 do you think that he would have created the HSD that GWB did protect us ..and all the tactics that GWB flexed to get us UBL?...NO WAY..
 
excatly... Im sure with little vetting we can find 9/11 truthers in Obama's inner circle of idgits..

but think about this..if Obama was President on 9/11 do you think that he would have created the HSD that GWB did protect us ..and all the tactics that GWB flexed to get us UBL?...NO WAY..

But Bush allowed waterboarding which is mean and hurts people by squirting water up their noses. Obama hates waterboarding and instead uses drones to blow people in to tiny pieces. Which one is torture?
 
But Bush allowed waterboarding which is mean and hurts people by squirting water up their noses. Obama hates waterboarding and instead uses drones to blow people in to tiny pieces. Which one is torture?

You are using logic and reasoning.. we know Libs aint fond of either...: )
 
Turns out yesterday jobs report was an even bigger disaster than people were led to believe

US economy adds 96K jobs, rate falls to 8.1 pct. - Yahoo! News

The government also said Friday that 41,000 fewer jobs were created in July and June than first estimated. The economy has added just 139,000 jobs a month since the start of the year, below 2011's average of 153,000.

Less jobs being created this year than in 2011. It's all Obama's fault. He got his stimulus and HC Bill.

The Economy is slowing back down and this is after 6 trillion has been borrowed/printed/spent

Irrefutable Proof that Obama's Economic Policies are an absolute failure. I can't wait for the debates.
 
Turns out yesterday jobs report was an even bigger disaster than people were led to believe

US economy adds 96K jobs, rate falls to 8.1 pct. - Yahoo! News



Less jobs being created this year than in 2011. It's all Obama's fault. He got his stimulus and HC Bill.

The Economy is slowing back down and this is after 6 trillion has been borrowed/printed/spent

Irrefutable Proof that Obama's Economic Policies are an absolute failure. I can't wait for the debates.


Absolutely! Not to mention that the revision for the past two months was -40K jobs each month, so if that happens now to this 96K Jobs report, then that means that the country only created some 56K jobs....

Now earlier, OC wanted to dismiss the 2,000 jobs that liberal anti oil groups say the Keystone pipeline would create, however a micro view of that project alone would be more than double what the Obama administration can claim for the month of August...
 
Absolutely! Not to mention that the revision for the past two months was -40K jobs each month, so if that happens now to this 96K Jobs report, then that means that the country only created some 56K jobs....

Now earlier, OC wanted to dismiss the 2,000 jobs that liberal anti oil groups say the Keystone pipeline would create, however a micro view of that project alone would be more than double what the Obama administration can claim for the month of August...

true, and if permits were issued for drilling in the gulf, thousands of jobs would be created instantly.

But, I really think obama is getting what he wants. He wants the US to be brought down from its lofty perch, he wants the US to be at the same level as the rest of the world, he resents our success, and thinks the country should be punished for its successes. Oh---and punished for slavery.
 
true, and if permits were issued for drilling in the gulf, thousands of jobs would be created instantly.

But, I really think obama is getting what he wants. He wants the US to be brought down from its lofty perch, he wants the US to be at the same level as the rest of the world, he resents our success, and thinks the country should be punished for its successes. Oh---and punished for slavery.


Bakken is a case in point....Housing is at a premium, and they can't get enough people to get out there to work....I believe that Unemployment is non existent in that region....Meanwhile, it costs my family $100 per week to keep the cars fueled up to get to work....Think of what I could do with that money if I didn't have to burn it up in my tank....
 
Bakken is a case in point....Housing is at a premium, and they can't get enough people to get out there to work....I believe that Unemployment is non existent in that region....Meanwhile, it costs my family $100 per week to keep the cars fueled up to get to work....Think of what I could do with that money if I didn't have to burn it up in my tank....

absolutely correct, but to the libtards oil is evil and we must spend billions trying to invent a solar powered 18 wheeler. Obama is on a mission to destroy the US economy and bring us down to the level of the rest of the world. He hates our success and believes that we must be punished for it.

If the fools give him another term, the USA as the founders designed it is over.
 
Back
Top Bottom