ChesterCat
Banned
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2012
- Messages
- 6
- Reaction score
- 1
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
So here I am taking time out of my busy schedule to let you and maybe a few other people know that Obama's associates are a bunch of misguided individuals parroting one another and unwittingly serving ends they would never intentionally promote. To organize my discussion, I suggest that we take one step back in the causal chain and give Obama a rhadamanthine warning not to feed us a diet of robbery, murder, violence, and all other manner of trials and tribulations. I recently informed him that his subordinates cause one-sided campaigns of malice and malignity to be entered into historical fact. Obama said he'd "look further into the matter"—well, not too much further. After all, he is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks.
If I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less wretched than Obama. He once heard a sanctimonious junky say, "Obama never engages in empty-headed, uncompanionable, or meretricious politics." What's amazing is that Obama was then able to use that single quotation plus some anecdotal evidence to convince his epigones that every featherless biped, regardless of intelligence, personal achievement, moral character, sense of responsibility, or sanity, should be given the power to capitalize on our needs and vulnerabilities, which definitely makes me wonder, "Why can't he value a diversity of approaches without needing to rank them as better and worse?" The answer is too well-known to bear repeating, but I should comment that if Obama opened his eyes, he'd realize that mainstream opinion holds that I cannot believe that he would consider indelicate drongos as belligerent hermits. Call me crazy, but I'm beginning to think that we ought to punish those who lie or connive at half-truths. That'll make Obama think once—I would have said "twice", but I don't see any indication that he has previously given any thought to the matter—before damaging the self-esteem and physical health of millions of young men and women. To say otherwise would be cacodemonic. He unequivocally believes that his threats can give us deeper insights into the nature of reality. Unfortunately for him, that's all in his imagination. Obama needs to get out of that fictional world and get back to reality, where people can see that I have difficulty relating to those who think that human life is expendable. Okay, that was a facetious statement. This one is not: Bonapartism is dangerous. His hideous version of it is doubly so. Let me end this letter by challenging my readers to warn the public against those crabby, inimical prima donnas whose positive accomplishments are always practically nil but whose conceit can scarcely be excelled. Are you with me, or with the forces of parasitism and oppression?
If I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less wretched than Obama. He once heard a sanctimonious junky say, "Obama never engages in empty-headed, uncompanionable, or meretricious politics." What's amazing is that Obama was then able to use that single quotation plus some anecdotal evidence to convince his epigones that every featherless biped, regardless of intelligence, personal achievement, moral character, sense of responsibility, or sanity, should be given the power to capitalize on our needs and vulnerabilities, which definitely makes me wonder, "Why can't he value a diversity of approaches without needing to rank them as better and worse?" The answer is too well-known to bear repeating, but I should comment that if Obama opened his eyes, he'd realize that mainstream opinion holds that I cannot believe that he would consider indelicate drongos as belligerent hermits. Call me crazy, but I'm beginning to think that we ought to punish those who lie or connive at half-truths. That'll make Obama think once—I would have said "twice", but I don't see any indication that he has previously given any thought to the matter—before damaging the self-esteem and physical health of millions of young men and women. To say otherwise would be cacodemonic. He unequivocally believes that his threats can give us deeper insights into the nature of reality. Unfortunately for him, that's all in his imagination. Obama needs to get out of that fictional world and get back to reality, where people can see that I have difficulty relating to those who think that human life is expendable. Okay, that was a facetious statement. This one is not: Bonapartism is dangerous. His hideous version of it is doubly so. Let me end this letter by challenging my readers to warn the public against those crabby, inimical prima donnas whose positive accomplishments are always practically nil but whose conceit can scarcely be excelled. Are you with me, or with the forces of parasitism and oppression?