

The quality of American's lives are at stake. It seem's the Republican's and Democrat's; don't seem to prioritize that.

Originally Posted by Dick Cheney

Originally Posted by Dick Cheney

WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Originally Posted by A. de Tocqueville

It can be equally arguable that he didn't try "bipartisanship", but that he had to take steps to win over the more conservative individuals in his own party and rather than portray it as a failure of his party to get the votes to get through what they wanted they decided to paint it as "bipartisanship". There's no greater argument that the actions that were undertaken to "water down" the health care bill away from what the Democrat Base wanted was done to "reach out to Republicans" then there is to suggest it was to reach out to conservative democrats. On the contrary, considering there was a time period that with Democrats and Democrat leaning Independents, the party had a Super Majority in congress and didn't even NEED to reach out to Republicans for health care.
For us to believe that the bending Obama did on Obamacare was for the benefit of the Republicans...we need to believe they were SO intent on trying to get Republicans to vote with them that they passed on a chance to pass through exactly what they wanted with a super majoirty but not so intent as to actually budge far enough to actually win over any Republicans. That, frankly, doesn't make sense. The far more likely conclussion to come up with is that Obama and the Democratic Party couldn't muster their own forces enough to pass through, even with a super majority, the type of health care reform they really wanted so had to "compromise" to get votes from their own party and pitched the "bipartisan" argument as a means of damage control.

Wow, wonderful job spewing rhetoric without any actual sense of...you know...reality.
The fact that the health care law that was passed was not the type Obama is reasonably believed to actually desire is proof positive he's not "dictator" in chief. This type of hyperbole does nothing but make your arguments look foolish.

