• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

So...who will replace Romney as the GOP Candidate?

Ikari said:
Partisan crap people have been spoon fed is believing there's a difference between Obama and Romney.
Click to expand...

There is a big difference in that Romney is control by the Conservative Politburo of Norquist, Limbaugh and Murdock.
 
upsideguy said:
There is a big difference in that Romney is control by the Conservative Politburo of Norquist, Limbaugh and Murdock.
Click to expand...

Hey, some moderator, can you move this to the CT forum?
 
Anybody who thinks this is going to be a slam dunk easy win for either candidate isn't thirsty anymore. They've had more than their fill of kool-aid (either red or blue, depending on preference). Of course, looking over who's saying that, it's not a surprise.

I see Cons, though, are still struggling with it. "Do we embrace Romney and claim that we always supported him, or do we hold out hope that the corpse of Ronald Reagan will rise from the grave and shake off the Alzheimer's?" Try as they might, the two parties are not the parties of Lincoln and Jackson, or even Reagan and Clinton (respectively). They're the parties of Tweedle-dee and Tweedle-dum (aka Bush and Obama).
 
tecoyah said:
Ask a serious question in a debate forum for politics...and get the same silly partisan crap.
Click to expand...

I know, huh?!? Just like the silly crap about how Obama is a shoe in!
 
tecoyah said:
I fail to see how this is "Partisan Crap"...there is a new Bain Fiasco for Romney, as he claimed to no longer be a part of it, yet SCC documentation states otherwise. The Fipping issue is so well documented as to be irrefutable, and his non white draw is very well established.

These are simply fact, truth, and reality...denying it does not make it go away.

I asked a very simple question...and it had NOTHING to do with Obama. Yet rather than answer it people decide to dodge and weave in favor of attack on the current president. Thus, Partisan Crap.

I'm gonna go with Rubio...Cristy is too damn fat and ill tempered, Palenty is like a Romney light....without the $$$$.

No one else stands a chance. (IMHO)
Click to expand...

Both posts are partisan crap. Deal with it.
 
Ikari said:
Partisan crap people have been spoon fed is believing there's a difference between Obama and Romney.
Click to expand...

Romney isn't a fullbore Liberal.
 
tecoyah said:
I fail to see how this is "Partisan Crap"...there is a new Bain Fiasco for Romney, as he claimed to no longer be a part of it, yet SCC documentation states otherwise. The Fipping issue is so well documented as to be irrefutable, and his non white draw is very well established.

These are simply fact, truth, and reality...denying it does not make it go away.

I asked a very simple question...and it had NOTHING to do with Obama. Yet rather than answer it people decide to dodge and weave in favor of attack on the current president. Thus, Partisan Crap.

I'm gonna go with Rubio...Cristy is too damn fat and ill tempered, Palenty is like a Romney light....without the $$$$.

No one else stands a chance. (IMHO)
Click to expand...

Since you are never going to vote republican in the first place, Ive got to ask why those of us that are should give a flying **** what you think?

Bait thread is bait...in more ways than one.
 
rocket88 said:
Anybody who thinks this is going to be a slam dunk easy win for either candidate isn't thirsty anymore. They've had more than their fill of kool-aid (either red or blue, depending on preference). Of course, looking over who's saying that, it's not a surprise.

I see Cons, though, are still struggling with it. "Do we embrace Romney and claim that we always supported him, or do we hold out hope that the corpse of Ronald Reagan will rise from the grave and shake off the Alzheimer's?" Try as they might, the two parties are not the parties of Lincoln and Jackson, or even Reagan and Clinton (respectively). They're the parties of Tweedle-dee and Tweedle-dum (aka Bush and Obama).
Click to expand...

It's funny to watch Libbos jump the Obama-boat.
 
Helix said:
not much of a bold prediction here, but i would guess that the chances that Romney is replaced at the convention approach zero.
Click to expand...

I agree it's not likely, but I would love it if Christie was given the nomination instead of Romney.
 
tecoyah said:
I am beginning to see a possibility that Romney will not be the GOP Presidential Candidate, primarily because they cannot be that desperate. Between the new Bain fiasco, flip flopping to the point of absolute confusion, and his inability to gain any measurable traction with anyone not white and over 50...It is quite possible the GOP will ditch him.

Who do you think would replace him?
Click to expand...

this might be one of the most idiotic bits of speculation I have seen.

you should be worrying about what happens when Romney replaces Oblama in the Oval Office
 
randel said:
funny, everything i hear has obama winning a second term
Click to expand...

I CANNOT BELIEVE NIXON WON EVERYONE I KNOW voted for McGovern


you need to stop hanging out at the local listening to a bunch of non-workers whine about Romney shutting down the public teat they suck from

everything I read is that its up in the air right now
 
tecoyah said:
Ask a serious question in a debate forum for politics...and get the same silly partisan crap.
Click to expand...

LOL if you thought your opening post was serious we cannot help you:mrgreen:
 
TurtleDude said:
I CANNOT BELIEVE NIXON WON EVERYONE I KNOW voted for McGovern


you need to stop hanging out at the local listening to a bunch of non-workers whine about Romney shutting down the public teat they suck from

everything I read is that its up in the air right now
Click to expand...

Intrade - Barack Obama to be re-elected President in 2012

Well, looks like while every one might be a stretch, people putting money on the election are favoring Obama...

Best part is, all your hysterical namecalling and mouth foaming won't change that.
 
Redress said:
Intrade - Barack Obama to be re-elected President in 2012

Well, looks like while every one might be a stretch, people putting money on the election are favoring Obama...

Best part is, all your hysterical namecalling and mouth foaming won't change that.
Click to expand...

what are the london bookies predicting.

I have constantly said its a toss up right now

Oblama has a big advantage-buying the votes of millions of losers with promises he will give them the money of far less winners

losers always outnumber winners and Obama appeals to the bigger group
 
TurtleDude said:
what are the london bookies predicting.

I have constantly said its a toss up right now

Oblama has a big advantage-buying the votes of millions of losers with promises he will give them the money of far less winners

losers always outnumber winners and Obama appeals to the bigger group
Click to expand...

Are you able to formulate arguments that go beyond name calling?
 
Redress said:
Are you able to formulate arguments that go beyond name calling?
Click to expand...

are you able to see what an idiotic opening post this thread was started with. and yes, Obama's campaign is targeting the losers with promises he will afflict the comfortable.

do you know who the London bookies are betting on?
 
tecoyah said:
I am beginning to see a possibility that Romney will not be the GOP Presidential Candidate, primarily because they cannot be that desperate. Between the new Bain fiasco, flip flopping to the point of absolute confusion, and his inability to gain any measurable traction with anyone not white and over 50...It is quite possible the GOP will ditch him.

Who do you think would replace him?
Click to expand...

Speaking of desperate, this "issue" shows how desperate the Obamabots are.
 
TurtleDude said:
are you able to see what an idiotic opening post this thread was started with. and yes, Obama's campaign is targeting the losers with promises he will afflict the comfortable.
Click to expand...

He is also telling people that they will have to pay for health insurance. I doubt that will affect millionaires that much

do you know who the London bookies are betting on?
Click to expand...

Why don't you tell us instead of playing cat and mouse.
 
winston53660 said:
Ya know there is such a thing as a search engine......
Click to expand...

I almost never answer a question I don't know the answer to. its the background of teaching law and trying cases
 
winston53660 said:
He is also telling people that they will have to pay for health insurance. I doubt that will affect millionaires that much



Why don't you tell us instead of playing cat and mouse.
Click to expand...

G O O G L E

you know its there
 
tecoyah said:
I am beginning to see a possibility that Romney will not be the GOP Presidential Candidate, primarily because they cannot be that desperate. Between the new Bain fiasco, flip flopping to the point of absolute confusion, and his inability to gain any measurable traction with anyone not white and over 50...It is quite possible the GOP will ditch him.

Who do you think would replace him?
Click to expand...


What a totally worthless OP and thread.
 
tecoyah said:
I fail to see how this is "Partisan Crap"...there is a new Bain Fiasco for Romney, as he claimed to no longer be a part of it, yet SCC documentation states otherwise. The Fipping issue is so well documented as to be irrefutable, and his non white draw is very well established.

These are simply fact, truth, and reality...denying it does not make it go away.

I asked a very simple question...and it had NOTHING to do with Obama. Yet rather than answer it people decide to dodge and weave in favor of attack on the current president. Thus, Partisan Crap.

I'm gonna go with Rubio...Cristy is too damn fat and ill tempered, Palenty is like a Romney light....without the $$$$.

No one else stands a chance. (IMHO)
Click to expand...

Check the other posts. It's been debunked by both the Washington Post Fact Checker and the Annenberg Fact Check. Why would you keep insisting it's true? It demeans you.
 
Redress said:
Intrade - Barack Obama to be re-elected President in 2012

Well, looks like while every one might be a stretch, people putting money on the election are favoring Obama...

Best part is, all your hysterical namecalling and mouth foaming won't change that.
Click to expand...

55.5% shot this far out based on people putting money on Obama. I'd say that's still within the realm of a toss up and suggest that it'd point to "everyone" being a DEFINITE stretch not a "might be one". Even in regards to people putting money on the election, it's not even a stretch but a largely false statement to say everyone there is putting their money on him.

Best part is, your chiding of turtle and focus on overblowing what he says won't change that.

To the OP...the Republican's aren't going to switch off from Romney and you're deluding yourself into thinking that everyone thinks like you. This election is likely to be a close one. Hey...even the people Redress's references putting money on it have it sitting at a pretty close race at this point in time.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom