- Joined
- Jun 13, 2012
- Messages
- 3,195
- Reaction score
- 1,192
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
You know I was reading the "Evil Romney and his murky finances" thread and realized the people objectifying Romney as some "Evil Rich" villain twirling his mustache don't realize 3 critical facts:
1) You cannot hide anything in a Swiss Bank account. We have a Treaty with Sweden that makes it against the law to do so
HowStuffWorks "Swiss Bank Account Laws and Regulations"
2) Romney is the one who disclosed that he had a Swiss Bank account on his tax records
3) Romney paid taxes on the bank account to the US Government
So since the new emotional talking point is Swiss Bank Account = Evil can you Obama Supporters please explain this hypocrisy to me? Thank you:
Dem. Chair Invested in Swiss Banks, Foreign Drug Companies, and the State Bank of India | The Weekly Standard
1) You cannot hide anything in a Swiss Bank account. We have a Treaty with Sweden that makes it against the law to do so
HowStuffWorks "Swiss Bank Account Laws and Regulations"
International mutual assistance in criminal matters
Switzerland is required to assist the authorities of foreign states in criminal matters as a result of the 1983 federal law relating to International Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters. Assets can be frozen and handed over to the foreign authorities concerned. Assistance in criminal matters follows the principles of dual criminality, specialty and proportionality.
2) Romney is the one who disclosed that he had a Swiss Bank account on his tax records
3) Romney paid taxes on the bank account to the US Government
So since the new emotional talking point is Swiss Bank Account = Evil can you Obama Supporters please explain this hypocrisy to me? Thank you:
Dem. Chair Invested in Swiss Banks, Foreign Drug Companies, and the State Bank of India | The Weekly Standard
"Americans need to ask themselves, why does an American businessman need a Swiss bank account and secretive investments like that?" the DNC chair, a chief surrogate for President Obama's reelection team, said on Fox News Sunday two days ago. "Just something, a thought, that I'd like to leave folks with."
It's been a consistent theme of Obama's reelection strategy: Attack Romney for foreign investments he held, especially in Swiss bank accounts, "to try to promote his wealthy, out-of-touch businessman persona."
But disclosure forms reveal that in 2010, Wasserman Schultz invested between $1,001-$15,000 in a 401k retirement fund run by Davis Financial Fund. As the fund discloses, it is invested in the Julius Baer Group Ltd. and the State Bank of India GDR Ltd., as well as other financial, insurance, bank institutions.
"The Julius Baer Group is the leading Swiss private banking group, focusing exclusively on the demands of sophisticated private clients, family offices and external asset managers from around the world," its website explains. "Bank Julius Baer is the principal operating company of the Julius Baer Group, with origins dating back to 1890. The rich Swiss heritage becomes manifest in the values for which the Bank stands, e.g. trustworthiness, accountability, discretion and expertise. However, at the same time Julius Baer is a modern, forward-looking company at the leading edge of a genuine growth industry."
Similarly, according to disclosure forms from 2004, Wasserman Schultz had holdings in the Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund. That fund is invested in HSBC bank (a British financial institution), Hengdeli Holdings (a Hong Kong watch company), Novo Nordisk (a Danish drug company), Volkswagen (a German auto company), Rakuten (a Japanese shipping business), Richemont Cie Financiere (a Swiss luxury goods company), and many others.
To be clear, there is nothing in Debbie Wasserman Schultz's disclosure forms to suggest that the DNC chair invested in anything illegal. But it is clear that some of her holdings had investments overseas, in Swiss banks, foreign drug companies, the state bank of India, and many other overseas holdings.
The hypocrisy, though, is clear: The Democrats, as well as President Obama, hope to paint Romney as an out of touch man for holding money in overseas bank accounts, when in reality their own chairman, Wasserman Schultz, had overseas investments.
All this comes in addition to Wasserman Schultz's refusal to disclose her own tax returns, despite continuously calling on Romney to do so.