• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

DNC Chair is "Happy" with 8.2% Unemployment [W:198]

Misleading title. However, she has handed many gifts to the republicans before. She should stop going on Fox where she is bound to be torn apart.
 
Joe51 said:
My response was the answer to that question would only be relevant if congress had passed anything of Obama's agenda since the tea party took over. Obama focused on HC and financial sector reform while he had the chance. Everything after that is continuation of previous administrations policies because the tea party set out to destroy him (and by proxy us). Bush laid such a good groundwork for destroying the economy, all they had to do was just say no to anything. It has worked very well, but it's not Obama's policies. In fact, I'd argue that the things he has been able to accomplish without congress are the reason we are at least seeing slow growth. If you're tea party boys would play the game, we could be moving a little faster.


wow.. no need to talk with you.. you cant see Obama is the plague.. the Torjab Horsse...

oh the wrascally Tea party people.. Obama put them on the wathc list.. what a loser how thin skinned is the fascist Obama.. btu Chavez is not a threat ..only the Tea party....
Click to expand...
 
Hugh_Akston said:
When did the Tea Party take over? I must have missed that.
Click to expand...



yea me too.. but Obama has put the Tea Party on the terrorist watch list.. this fascist must be voted out..
 
James Cessna said:
20110505-215325-pic-407391143_s640x425.jpg


"My name is Debbie Wasserman Schultz and I am a flaming liberal. And as a flaming liberal and a Democratic socialist I must tell you the money in your savings and checking accounts does not actually belong to you. Instead, your money, the money you have worked so hard for, collectively, belongs to the federal government! This is why I support increasing our income tax rate to 70 percent like it was in the good old days before the Republicans were in charge of tax policy!” ... Here is another very liberal Democrat a lot of people would like to slap some common sense into!
Click to expand...




shes a moron.. a disgrace.. like Pelosi and all of Obama's losers..
 
AdamT said:
2010 is when they took over the House of Representatives, for all intents and purposes.
Click to expand...

but no issue with Pelosi and the FACT that thats when the economy soured...?
 
Misterveritis said:
Are you able to answer my reasonable question Joe? Here it is again since Redress won't answer it. Joe. in how many months did the economy shed 750,000 jobs? How many of those months were before the one term Marxist flexible president Barrack Hussein Obama won the election? And how many of them were after the elections in November?
Click to expand...

.. of course he cant..
 
washunut said:
Thanks for making my point. So perhaps you can explain why you and other partisans keep talking about a number from nearly 4 years ago with no context.

BTW I think the whole Schultz thing is just another partisan tit for tat.
Click to expand...

Comparing numbers is context.
 
Joe51 said:
My response was the answer to that question would only be relevant if ...
Click to expand...
In other words you do not want to answer. Why not? Why not tell me how many months before and how many months after the one term Marxist was elected there were losses of 750,000 jobs per month?
 
Travis007 said:
.. of course he cant..
Click to expand...
okay then. Back to that slippery Redress...

Originally Posted by Redress
You conservatives are seeing everything through carnival mirror glasses and can't underttand why non-conservatives can't. No one said 80k jobs is great, but that it is alot better than losing 750k jobs a month, which is where we were less than 4 years ago. In other words, it is better than it was, but not yet where it should be.
Click to expand...

Redress, in how many months did the economy shed 750,000 jobs? How many of those months were before the one term Marxist flexible president Barrack Hussein Obama won the election? And how many of them were after the elections in November?

You have been wonderfully silent on this question? Why is that?

Joe tried. Joe failed. What is that sound? .
 
Redress said:
Comparing numbers is context.
Click to expand...

Ok if that is what you really think that is fine. So we can use that as an excuse for current performance until we have another monthly drop of 750K. I wish the Obama campaign would spell that out more clearly of what we can expect if he is re-elected.
 
washunut said:
Ok if that is what you really think that is fine. So we can use that as an excuse for current performance until we have another monthly drop of 750K. I wish the Obama campaign would spell that out more clearly of what we can expect if he is re-elected.
Click to expand...

if Obama really told people what to expect.. he'd never have a chance... but much more of the same on steroids and unchecked would be it..
 
Travis007 said:
yea me too.. but Obama has put the Tea Party on the terrorist watch list.. this fascist must be voted out..
Click to expand...

You sure you didn't get that one from a fw:fw:fw: email?
 
washunut said:
Ok if that is what you really think that is fine. So we can use that as an excuse for current performance until we have another monthly drop of 750K. I wish the Obama campaign would spell that out more clearly of what we can expect if he is re-elected.
Click to expand...

Why do you expect mroe from Obama than any other candidate. None spell out clearly what to expect.
 
Deuce said:
You sure you didn't get that one from a fw:fw:fw: email?
Click to expand...

It is just made up. I can find no references to it happening. There is a disputed claim that Biden called the Tea Party terrorists at a speech, but not that the Tea Party is on a terrorist watch list.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom