• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Romney slams Romney reasoning ... again

OpportunityCost said:
Its about time we got some people elected that want government to do less, because we cannot afford for it do more any longer.
Click to expand...

That is what I always say, if you want someone to do less for the same pay, hire a republican.
 
AdamT said:
And therefore it's okay for Romney to be a complete hyporite liar? Or is that just a generic rant because you can't defend Romney?
Click to expand...

I could put up a long list of Obama lies, if you would like I will oblige.

What I am looking for is someone that can turn this country around. You can beat a dead horse forever about lies and such that don't mean a damn thing. Obama never ran a lemon aid stand and it shows, he has not turned this economy around, thus his economic policies are a failure. Now compare Obama with no clue on economic issues to Romney that actually ran a very successful company, ran a successful Olympics, was a Governor of MA, and is a lawyer.

To answer your question, I'm looking at a persons record of success, Obama has none and Romney has an extremely strong record of successes. Try this, take away anything either one has said in the past as though they said nothing, and just focus on what they both have done.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
That is what I always say, if you want someone to do less for the same pay, hire a republican.
Click to expand...

No you got it wrong, if you want more work for the same pay hire a republican, while the liberal sits at home sucking on the government's tits.
 
Last edited:
Born Free said:
No you got it wrong, if you want more work for the same pay hire a republican, while the liberal sits at home sucking on the government's tits.
Click to expand...

In a way, you can't blame them, boobies rule.

:lol:
 
Born Free said:
Well at least a Republican will work, while the liberal sits at home sucking on the government's tits.
Click to expand...
Non sequitur, you didn't counter that the repug will do less and the repug IS sucking....unless he is volunteering to do less for free.

Try again, this time wear a helmet.
 
Objective Voice said:
I'll give you the growth of the national debt (necessary though it was), but when a country loses millions of jobs that span the (financial) service industry not manufacturing on top of the thousands of jobs lost in the public sector and there's NO consorted effort to bring about retraining programs NOR a real push to create new industries, how do you expect those under-employment numbers to go down? What is Obama suppose to do? Bring back those service industry jobs?

Sorry, pal...not happening but it's not due to what the President has done. You can thank the financial services industry for those loses.
Click to expand...

Dodd Frank... Your post had no facts...
 
Gimmesometruth said:
That is what I always say, if you want someone to do less for the same pay, hire a republican.
Click to expand...

Im talking about the government. How much more do you really think we need the government to do? Its at 24% of GDP right now. Deficits are over the GDP. I think its time to quit digging, you seem to think its time to fire up the back hoe.

Lets see if you can out your money where your snark is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom