• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

The GOP screwed up so bad that even a black man can be voted President![W: 15]

D

debatedeb1

Member
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
66
Reaction score
2
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
It takes more than bubble gum wrappers and pop bottles to bring back a failed economy. A person who speaks so lightly of a crisis situation, probably doesn't understand the situation. Allow me to help you.

The GOP screwed up so bad, that even a black man could be elected President! Damn, that's bad!

They sure know how to throw a good ol' party (GOP). They are so hung over that they don't even realize what happened. Like they are still in a drunken stupor which means "a state of near-unconsciousness or insensibility".

it's going to take trillions to dig us out! TRILLIONS! They feel that there has been no harm done. They are still drunk and ready to "party down" like frat brothers and put us right back in it all over again.

...And then criticize anybody who tries to dig us out by saying with day old Vodka breath, "...wh, wh, what took you soo lo, lo, long?"

They need to pull themselves together and get their a__s in gear or risk suffering an even greater consequence...



...a Mexican President.







I look forward to it.

Sober up America.
 
be3.jpg
 
,jhv,jvg.jpeg.gikg.jpeg

not even sure if its attacking gop for being inept or democrats or both.

it simply lacks debateand targets anger therefore,bait and thread
 
:beam: So, it's the republican's fault a black man got elected? :blink:
 
Boo Radley said:
:beam: So, it's the republican's fault a black man got elected? :blink:
Click to expand...



Makes you wonder...If Bush ended on a great note, there would have no hype for change.
 
debatedeb1 said:
Makes you wonder...If Bush ended on a great note, there would have no hype for change.
Click to expand...

Yeah, the other side does tend to win when one side is unpopular, usually for polices the people don't favor. But what does Obama being a black man have to do with? What's the debate here?
 
Boo Radley said:
Yeah, the other side does tend to win when one side is unpopular, usually for polices the people don't favor. But what does Obama being a black man have to do with? What's the debate here?
Click to expand...

theres no debate its a bait thread.
 
debatedeb1 said:
Oh, I'm sorry, I thought this forum was for grown-ups.
Click to expand...


It is.

This is why you're being called out for your pathetic, inane troll. And race-baiting subject line.
 
Boo Radley said:
Yeah, the other side does tend to win when one side is unpopular, usually for polices the people don't favor. But what does Obama being a black man have to do with? What's the debate here?
Click to expand...



What If someone says to you, "Your scheme is so obvious that even Stevie Wonder can see thorough it . The debate is not about Stevie Wonder. Stevie Wonder is used only to gauge the depth of injury. People who know of Stevie Wonder knows the legacy of him being blind.

"...that even a black man can be voted president". doesn't mean the debate is about a black man. A black man is used only to gauge to depth of the catastrophic situation...in this case, the failed economy.

People who know of "black men", know the legacy of being less than human, never will amount to anything, sabotage his enterprise, criminals, etc.

It's used only to gauge the seriousness of our fading economic outlook.

Critics say that Obama is spending too much money. Is he?

In the attacks that Obama is spending a lot of money, people would simply understand the gauge theory and comment on the fact that it takes a lot of money to pull this country together or it only takes bumble gum wrappers and pop bottles. On the other hand...

...I must admit that by saying "a black man" does bring about racial over tones.
So, I didn't want to go there but let's address it anyway. Non-racist would simply understand the gauge theory. Racist would understand in their own little way what this statement means. They would hang their heads in disgust as to think that they screwed up this bad.

They have become extremely bitter as to what has transpired in the White House and have vowed to use every bit of strength to oust the "less than human" by coming up with lame excuses as to why Obama shouldn't be there.

And that is what this debate is about....Spending (seriousness) , and who's complaining.
 
nota bene said:
It is.

This is why you're being called out for your pathetic, inane troll. And race-baiting subject line.
Click to expand...



Well, if you get off by calling people names, that's O.K. It's Saturday night and nobody would go out with you. Just remember. If you are right handed, don't use your left, or you'll be accused of being unfaithful.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Let's all remember to be civil and to cease the personal attacks.
 
To insinuate Obama was elected because the GOP screwed up may be partially true, but It has nothing to do with his race...when a party screws up so bad the american mass's realize it...they throw them out...was a party thing not a race thing.
 
debatedeb1 said:
It takes more than bubble gum wrappers and pop bottles to bring back a failed economy. A person who speaks so lightly of a crisis situation, probably doesn't understand the situation. Allow me to help you.

The GOP screwed up so bad, that even a black man could be elected President! Damn, that's bad!

They sure know how to throw a good ol' party (GOP). They are so hung over that they don't even realize what happened. Like they are still in a drunken stupor which means "a state of near-unconsciousness or insensibility".

it's going to take trillions to dig us out! TRILLIONS! They feel that there has been no harm done. They are still drunk and ready to "party down" like frat brothers and put us right back in it all over again.

...And then criticize anybody who tries to dig us out by saying with day old Vodka breath, "...wh, wh, what took you soo lo, lo, long?"

They need to pull themselves together and get their a__s in gear or risk suffering an even greater consequence...


...a Mexican President.


I look forward to it.

Sober up America.
Click to expand...

Is it just me or is anyone else having a problem understanding what the heck this means?
 
debatedeb1 said:
What If someone says to you, "Your scheme is so obvious that even Stevie Wonder can see thorough it . The debate is not about Stevie Wonder. Stevie Wonder is used only to gauge the depth of injury. People who know of Stevie Wonder knows the legacy of him being blind.

"...that even a black man can be voted president". doesn't mean the debate is about a black man. A black man is used only to gauge to depth of the catastrophic situation...in this case, the failed economy.

People who know of "black men", know the legacy of being less than human, never will amount to anything, sabotage his enterprise, criminals, etc.

It's used only to gauge the seriousness of our fading economic outlook.

Critics say that Obama is spending too much money. Is he?

In the attacks that Obama is spending a lot of money, people would simply understand the gauge theory and comment on the fact that it takes a lot of money to pull this country together or it only takes bumble gum wrappers and pop bottles. On the other hand...

...I must admit that by saying "a black man" does bring about racial over tones.
So, I didn't want to go there but let's address it anyway. Non-racist would simply understand the gauge theory. Racist would understand in their own little way what this statement means. They would hang their heads in disgust as to think that they screwed up this bad.

They have become extremely bitter as to what has transpired in the White House and have vowed to use every bit of strength to oust the "less than human" by coming up with lame excuses as to why Obama shouldn't be there.

And that is what this debate is about....Spending (seriousness) , and who's complaining.
Click to expand...

Recognize the medium you are using. Dripping sarcasm doesn't translate well in written form very often. Especially when the people you are addressing don't have a clue as to who you are so there is no past to guage what kind of writting style you embrace. So complaining that people aren't intelligent enough or mature enough to grasp what you are writting is a bit off the mark.
 
Last edited:
poweRob said:
So complaining that people aren't intelligent enough or mature enough to grasp what you are writting is a bit off the mark.
Click to expand...



I agree, and I'm sure glad that I didn't complain that people aren't intelligent enough or mature enough to grasp what I am writing.
 
lpast said:
but It has nothing to do with his race...when a party screws up so bad the american mass's realize it...they throw them out..
Click to expand...


Makes sense, but when was the last time the term "food stamp president" was used on any previous presidents?
 
debatedeb1 said:
Makes sense, but when was the last time the term "food stamp president" was used on any previous presidents?
Click to expand...

When was the last time before Obama that we had a president that encouraged people to use food stamps?
 
TheNextEra said:
When was the last time before Obama that we had a president that encouraged people to use food stamps?
Click to expand...

That you do not see what is wrong with that statement is a large part of the problem.
 
Stormfront is leaking again.
 
debatedeb1 said:
What If someone says to you, "Your scheme is so obvious that even Stevie Wonder can see thorough it . The debate is not about Stevie Wonder. Stevie Wonder is used only to gauge the depth of injury. People who know of Stevie Wonder knows the legacy of him being blind.

"...that even a black man can be voted president". doesn't mean the debate is about a black man. A black man is used only to gauge to depth of the catastrophic situation...in this case, the failed economy.

People who know of "black men", know the legacy of being less than human, never will amount to anything, sabotage his enterprise, criminals, etc.

It's used only to gauge the seriousness of our fading economic outlook.

Critics say that Obama is spending too much money. Is he?

In the attacks that Obama is spending a lot of money, people would simply understand the gauge theory and comment on the fact that it takes a lot of money to pull this country together or it only takes bumble gum wrappers and pop bottles. On the other hand...

...I must admit that by saying "a black man" does bring about racial over tones.
So, I didn't want to go there but let's address it anyway. Non-racist would simply understand the gauge theory. Racist would understand in their own little way what this statement means. They would hang their heads in disgust as to think that they screwed up this bad.

They have become extremely bitter as to what has transpired in the White House and have vowed to use every bit of strength to oust the "less than human" by coming up with lame excuses as to why Obama shouldn't be there.

And that is what this debate is about....Spending (seriousness) , and who's complaining.
Click to expand...

You seem to be quite the racist, deb.

Perhaps you should read the rules of this forum before you go much further.

Just sayin...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom