• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

3 reasons Mitt Romney can win

Navy Pride

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
39,883
Reaction score
3,070
Location
Pacific NW
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Be afraid my left wing friends.......be very afraid..........




Opinion: 3 reasons Mitt Romney can win - Frank Donatelli - POLITICO.com


First, Romney is broadly acceptable to most conservatives, moderates and even a few disillusioned liberals. Aside from extreme Democratic partisans, most Americans believe that he would be a more than able chief executive. He has a record as a competent governor who dealt with many problems the next president will face — including job creation, economic growth, health care and energy. He won’t be easily caricatured as a dangerous right-winger.
Romney still has work to do, however, to galvanize his base and answer questions raised about him during the primaries. But his experience in national affairs and policy expertise should enable him to meet these challenges. He has an opportunity to compete for the support of virtually every voter discouraged by the current state of affairs in Washington.
Second, it seems clear that Obama won’t run on his record — always a bad sign for a president seeking reelection. His speeches are short on accomplishments but long on excuses. He blames everyone — Congress, Republicans, business, George W. Bush, world oil markets — except himself for the terrible state of our economy.
His approval rating has been less than 50 percent for the past two years. He barely mentions his economic stimulus or his “signature achievement” health care plan. No wonder. Both are widely unpopular. Obama wants to make this election about anything — see contraception, war on women, the rich and privileged — but his record.
If Romney can keep the focus on jobs and the economy, where Obama has proved unsuccessful and Romney shows experience and potential, he will win.


Third, “hope and change” works for the GOP this time. Four years ago, Obama was the shiny new car. Voters marveled at his sleek image, cruising speed and smooth handling. Too bad the car is seldom as good as it first appears.
Still, very few were prepared for how rudely the real world treated this president and his plans. His rhetoric of changing the world, changing the way Washington works and moving beyond the partisan divide is gone, replaced by constant attacks on the motives of his political opponents. If he wins reelection, Obama will have to gut out a narrow majority from mostly partisans who believe our current circumstances are the best we can do.
Continue Reading
[h=4]Text Size[/h]
  • -
  • +
  • reset


For the majority of Americans who believe that we can do better, Romney is an attractive alternative. He can help his cause immensely by laying out a concrete agenda for change. Fortunately, he has a target-rich environment to tout his proposals to expand the economy and create jobs, reform the tax system, stabilize energy costs and make America energy independent, and repeal and replace “Obamacare.”
Four years ago, Obama was content to campaign on generalities. Once in office, he had little to offer and let the liberals in Congress write his stimulus and health care bills. With a specific growth agenda, Romney will most likely be in much better position to shape and, ultimately, follow through on many of his campaign promises.
Four years ago, the GOP was seeking a third straight presidential victory, a difficult task made nearly impossible by the economic meltdown. Republicans were reduced to arguing that Obama was not up to the job of being president. But the public felt otherwise. The 2008 election was Obama’s to lose.
This time, there is a clear record, and a large majority of Americans feel the president has not performed as hoped. Now they are open to new policies and solutions — why Romney can win, and the 2012 election is his to lose.


Read more: Opinion: 3 reasons Mitt Romney can win - Frank Donatelli - POLITICO.com
 
Be afraid my left wing friends.......be very afraid..........




Opinion: 3 reasons Mitt Romney can win - Frank Donatelli - POLITICO.com


First, Romney is broadly acceptable to most conservatives, moderates and even a few disillusioned liberals. Aside from extreme Democratic partisans, most Americans believe that he would be a more than able chief executive. He has a record as a competent governor who dealt with many problems the next president will face — including job creation, economic growth, health care and energy. He won’t be easily caricatured as a dangerous right-winger.
Romney still has work to do, however, to galvanize his base and answer questions raised about him during the primaries. But his experience in national affairs and policy expertise should enable him to meet these challenges. He has an opportunity to compete for the support of virtually every voter discouraged by the current state of affairs in Washington.
Second, it seems clear that Obama won’t run on his record — always a bad sign for a president seeking reelection. His speeches are short on accomplishments but long on excuses. He blames everyone — Congress, Republicans, business, George W. Bush, world oil markets — except himself for the terrible state of our economy.
His approval rating has been less than 50 percent for the past two years. He barely mentions his economic stimulus or his “signature achievement” health care plan. No wonder. Both are widely unpopular. Obama wants to make this election about anything — see contraception, war on women, the rich and privileged — but his record.
If Romney can keep the focus on jobs and the economy, where Obama has proved unsuccessful and Romney shows experience and potential, he will win.


Third, “hope and change” works for the GOP this time. Four years ago, Obama was the shiny new car. Voters marveled at his sleek image, cruising speed and smooth handling. Too bad the car is seldom as good as it first appears.
Still, very few were prepared for how rudely the real world treated this president and his plans. His rhetoric of changing the world, changing the way Washington works and moving beyond the partisan divide is gone, replaced by constant attacks on the motives of his political opponents. If he wins reelection, Obama will have to gut out a narrow majority from mostly partisans who believe our current circumstances are the best we can do.
Continue Reading
[h=4]Text Size[/h]
  • -
  • +
  • reset


For the majority of Americans who believe that we can do better, Romney is an attractive alternative. He can help his cause immensely by laying out a concrete agenda for change. Fortunately, he has a target-rich environment to tout his proposals to expand the economy and create jobs, reform the tax system, stabilize energy costs and make America energy independent, and repeal and replace “Obamacare.”
Four years ago, Obama was content to campaign on generalities. Once in office, he had little to offer and let the liberals in Congress write his stimulus and health care bills. With a specific growth agenda, Romney will most likely be in much better position to shape and, ultimately, follow through on many of his campaign promises.
Four years ago, the GOP was seeking a third straight presidential victory, a difficult task made nearly impossible by the economic meltdown. Republicans were reduced to arguing that Obama was not up to the job of being president. But the public felt otherwise. The 2008 election was Obama’s to lose.
This time, there is a clear record, and a large majority of Americans feel the president has not performed as hoped. Now they are open to new policies and solutions — why Romney can win, and the 2012 election is his to lose.


Read more: Opinion: 3 reasons Mitt Romney can win - Frank Donatelli - POLITICO.com

Be afraid my left wing friends.......be very afraid..........

Um.... Romney IS left wing. :rofl
 
Um.... Romney IS left wing. :rofl

Yep and obama is a conservative. So we have a conservative democrat vs liberal republican. We havent seen that in a while.
 
Theres a very good chance romney will win...Obama isnt as unpopular and Jimmy Carter was and he has war success' <bin laden etc> where as Carter had all fails....Carter had an oil prices with sky high gas prices and rationing and so does Obama...theres ingredients that can beat Obama...but that can all change when the media starts pressuring romny into having to answer tough questions...so far hes avoided all of them...he cant do that till the election
 
Yep and obama is a conservative. So we have a conservative democrat vs liberal republican. We havent seen that in a while.

Obama ain't no Conservative. He is a Romneytive, which is just barely to the right of Far Left Liberal. LOL.
 
Last edited:
Be afraid my left wing friends.......be very afraid..........

The three reasons are
1) The system is a 50/50 split...flip a coin
2) Romney is not exceedingly different than Obama
3) The system is a 50/50 split...flip a coin
 
The three reasons are
1) The system is a 50/50 split...flip a coin
2) Romney is not exceedingly different than Obama
3) The system is a 50/50 split...flip a coin

What will ultimately determine the election is whichever side has the most enthusiasm, and gets out the vote. While Republicans are not that enthusiastic about Romney, there is plenty of enthusiasm to get rid of Obama. If that holds up to election day, Romney has a shot. I have always said, from the beginning, that Romney was the only Republican candidate who had a chance of beating Obama. At least the GOP picked a candidate who has a chance this time. McCain was a bad choice, and didn't have a chance in hell of winning.
 
If that holds up to election day, Romney has a shot.

Yes, of course he does. He's not exceedingly different than Obama. Obama wasn't exceedingly different than Bush. He has a shot, but America does not. Same ****, different day.
 
Be afraid my left wing friends.......be very afraid..........

I thought you told us to be very afraid of Santorum? How'd that go for you?

Also, it seems you are telling us that since Romney is like Obama that the only difference is an R in front of the name. If that's how you do politics, I'm afraid that is one of the severe problems of this country.
 
Last edited:
Be afraid my left wing friends.......be very afraid..........

Why would they be afraid of a liberal republican winning?Your left wing friends win no matter who wins.
 
Romney wants to FURTHER lower taxes on the rich in the middle of a debt crisis, that will never fly with voters, the polls hae benn very consistant with that. The only votes Romney will get are from the greedy rich and the Obama haters...and that won't be near enough. Epic fail is my prediction.
 
Last edited:
Obama ain't no Conservative. He is a Romneytive, which is just barely to the right of Far Left Liberal. LOL.

So you admit that Reagan was a liberal, too? Because many, MANY of Obama's and Romney's positions are in lock-step with what The Gipper espoused.
 
Romney barely beat Santorum.

In what world are you living in? Romney had Santorum beat by double the delegates at the time Santorum quit.
 
What will ultimately determine the election is whichever side has the most enthusiasm, and gets out the vote. While Republicans are not that enthusiastic about Romney, there is plenty of enthusiasm to get rid of Obama. If that holds up to election day, Romney has a shot. I have always said, from the beginning, that Romney was the only Republican candidate who had a chance of beating Obama. At least the GOP picked a candidate who has a chance this time. McCain was a bad choice, and didn't have a chance in hell of winning.

What? Why does Romney have the best chance?
 
So you admit that Reagan was a liberal, too? Because many, MANY of Obama's and Romney's positions are in lock-step with what The Gipper espoused.

Elaborate. Which positions?
 
If Romney does win it will be because of $$$.

i dont think romney has enough $$$ to match obamas $$$

remember during the last election obama beat all fundraising records,i think he raised around 1 billion during the election,not sure im going off of memory.i do know he has outraised every republican candidate to memory..
 
The three reasons are
1) The system is a 50/50 split...flip a coin
2) Romney is not exceedingly different than Obama
3) The system is a 50/50 split...flip a coin

Those are the only 3.
 
Mitt Romney has been running for president for 6 years now, doubt he has a better chance now. President Obama is liked by a great number of people and Mitt has a hard time warming up to the people.
 
Obama ain't no Conservative. He is a Romneytive, which is just barely to the right of Far Left Liberal. LOL.
No not really. Obama hasnt done anything progressive.
 
wrong thread.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom