- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Quod erat demonstrandum.
exactly, Kandahar's arguments invoked the silly side of the farce
Quod erat demonstrandum.
You'd think with a "no you may not have any weapons whatsoever" law on the books, DC would be totally crime free, yes?
I guess criminals will be criminals and laws don't do a great deal to curtail their activities.
But as usual, it's better to blame "others" for criminals being criminals, rather than saying our gun laws are a farce.
I'm referring to idiotic statements like these:
I am sorry that you hate yourself so much, and that you are so insecure, that you feel the need to prove your masculinity by buying a big phallic extension. From everything you've ever posted, you sound like one truly miserable human being, and it must suck knowing that all your money and guns can't change that, no matter how much you brag about them. But that's YOUR problem, not mine.
Wonderful. Then carry your gun, I don't give a ****. Just stop braying about how "knowing how to protect yourself" with a gun is some sort of noble virtue as opposed to irrational paranoia, and how anyone who doesn't want one is somehow doing something wrong as opposed to being rational.
I wouldn't think that. DC is a tiny island surrounded by states with weak gun laws. As I mentioned above, it simply demonstrates that, in order to be effective, gun control laws have to be implemented at the national level.
is murder the only crime you can commit with a gun?
My problem is with gun-toting idiots who constantly feel the need to assert their manhood, and look down upon those of us who actually weigh our risks in a RATIONAL manner.
I'll admit that the main reason I own guns is because of my insecurities about my penis. I'm afraid that if I'm attacked by an armed criminal, my penis isn't nearly large enough or heavy enough for me to be able to kill him with it.