• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Why Should I Care About Ann Romney's Resume? [W:52]

Pinkie

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
12,316
Reaction score
3,220
Location
Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Independent
She's not running for anything. I assume they have children, and she was a stay-at-home Mommy. Good for her, good for the kids.

Now the only people we'll consider eligible to become President have to be married to people with similar qualifications? Since when?

This nauseating inquiry into Romney's personal life is distracting and annoying. What is Mitt's plan regarding the economy? Anyone know? Or are we just gonna chase shiney things around until November like a bunch of Pavlov's dogs?
 
She's not running for anything. I assume they have children, and she was a stay-at-home Mommy. Good for her, good for the kids.

Now the only people we'll consider eligible to become President have to be married to people with similar qualifications? Since when?

This nauseating inquiry into Romney's personal life is distracting and annoying. What is Mitt's plan regarding the economy? Anyone know? Or are we just gonna chase shiney things around until November like a bunch of Pavlov's dogs?

This is something I have been agreeing with for some time, but I just found something out....

Romney has been defending his wife's wish to be a stay at home mom.... So far, no problem. But in January, he said this:


Apparently, it is OK for his wife to be a stay at home mom, but not OK for regular Americans. Now, as far as Ann Romney goes, this is not about her, and we shouldn't be jumping all over her for her decisions in life, which are just as valid as decisions made by any other American. But, apparently, Mitt Romney believes that the choice to be a stay at home mom is a privilege that should only be enjoyed by wives of billionaire elitist assholes like himself.

Oh yea, and Mitt wants the government to spend more money too. You sure he ain't really a Democrat billionaire elitist asshole? :mrgreen:
 
Last edited:
She's not running for anything. I assume they have children, and she was a stay-at-home Mommy. Good for her, good for the kids.

Now the only people we'll consider eligible to become President have to be married to people with similar qualifications? Since when?

This nauseating inquiry into Romney's personal life is distracting and annoying. What is Mitt's plan regarding the economy? Anyone know? Or are we just gonna chase shiney things around until November like a bunch of Pavlov's dogs?

Pinkie, expect to see much more of this kind of campaigning from the liberals in the coming months...it's all they have and they've been quite effective with these sorts of tactics in the past.

Mitt has expressed his plans and policies. The fact that you don't know what they are is a testament to the opposition he's received from the liberal-leaning media. Frankly, if you want to know what he's about, you have to look beyond them. But what's even more disconcerting is the question of Obama's plans. What are they? He won't tell us. He'd rather have his surrogates talk about Mitt's wife, the so-called war on women and his class warfare.
 
Pinkie, expect to see much more of this kind of campaigning from the liberals in the coming months...it's all they have and they've been quite effective with these sorts of tactics in the past.

Mitt has expressed his plans and policies. The fact that you don't know what they are is a testament to the opposition he's received from the liberal-leaning media. Frankly, if you want to know what he's about, you have to look beyond them. But what's even more disconcerting is the question of Obama's plans. What are they? He won't tell us. He'd rather have his surrogates talk about Mitt's wife, the so-called war on women and his class warfare.

its not an issue that only liberals perpetuate. do i need to bring up the large number of threads here about Michelle obama? what about the hatred for Hillary Clinton in the 90s. the simple fact is, if someone doesn't like someone, they will find fault wherever they can in that person or their associations. the reason for this is mainly confirmation bias.

Sent from my YP-G1 using Tapatalk 2
 
Last edited:
I wonder how much help she had around the house as well. I'm sure there had to be some kind of human assistance for her while she had her hair and nails done. This made her in home job a tad easier than for most stay at home moms. But you are correct Pinkie why the hell should we care anything about her?
 
its not an issue that only liberals perpetuate. do i need to bring up the large number of threads here about Michelle obama? what about the hatred for Hillary Clinton in the 90s. the simple fact is, if someone doesn't like someone, they will find fault wherever they can in that person or their associations. the reason for this is mainly confirmation bias.

Sent from my YP-G1 using Tapatalk 2

Or cynical political messaging.
 
Pinkie, expect to see much more of this kind of campaigning from the liberals in the coming months...it's all they have and they've been quite effective with these sorts of tactics in the past.

Mitt has expressed his plans and policies. The fact that you don't know what they are is a testament to the opposition he's received from the liberal-leaning media. Frankly, if you want to know what he's about, you have to look beyond them. But what's even more disconcerting is the question of Obama's plans. What are they? He won't tell us. He'd rather have his surrogates talk about Mitt's wife, the so-called war on women and his class warfare.

I'm sure you were quite vocal in denouncing the attacks on Michelle Obama back in '07/'08, right?
 
You MUST care about Annie or you are a class warfare, wealth envy, Gawdless Commie.

(Heard it on Talk Radio, must be true)
 
This is something I have been agreeing with for some time, but I just found something out....

Romney has been defending his wife's wish to be a stay at home mom.... So far, no problem. But in January, he said this:



Apparently, it is OK for his wife to be a stay at home mom, but not OK for regular Americans. Now, as far as Ann Romney goes, this is not about her, and we shouldn't be jumping all over her for her decisions in life, which are just as valid as decisions made by any other American. But, apparently, Mitt Romney believes that the choice to be a stay at home mom is a privilege that should only be enjoyed by wives of billionaire elitist assholes like himself.

Oh yea, and Mitt wants the government to spend more money too. You sure he ain't really a Democrat billionaire elitist asshole? :mrgreen:

Perhaps you should have resisted taking a soundbite and applying some sort of unrelated meaning to it. Romney's remarks were in the context of enabling women who are living on welfare to become self-sustaining...with a little help from the government for day care...enabling them to get off the dole. It has nothing to do with who should be privileged enough to be a stay at home mom. This was a position championed by Clinton and a majority of Congress during his Presidency and, with the increase in the number of people dependent on government assistance lately, Romney's proposal would help reduce unemployment and government spending...something Obama has pretty much ignored.

Now, danarhea, I can understand you being someone who hates Romney...but, at least, do me the favor of resisting liberal debating tactics. It's beneath one who calls himself a conservative.
 
its not an issue that only liberals perpetuate. do i need to bring up the large number of threads here about Michelle obama? what about the hatred for Hillary Clinton in the 90s. the simple fact is, if someone doesn't like someone, they will find fault wherever they can in that person or their associations. the reason for this is mainly confirmation bias.

Sent from my YP-G1 using Tapatalk 2

Hmmm...

Can you give me examples of mainstream media figures making comments about Michelle? Before she became First Lady? I don't remember any...but then, I'm getting old.

Anyway, I see this liberal attack on Romney...through attacking his wife to be a pathetic tactic being used by the liberals...currently.

Do you excuse this action because something like it might have happened in the past?
 
her husband's record and policy positions are the important factors. her own is mostly irrelevant.

my opinion is that spouses of politicians should not be attacked in elections.
 
I'm sure you were quite vocal in denouncing the attacks on Michelle Obama back in '07/'08, right?

As I said to megaprogman, you'll have to do me the favor of giving me some examples...you know, some mainstream network person attacking Michelle back then. I just don't remember any.
 
Pinkie, expect to see much more of this kind of campaigning from the liberals in the coming months...it's all they have and they've been quite effective with these sorts of tactics in the past.

Mitt has expressed his plans and policies. The fact that you don't know what they are is a testament to the opposition he's received from the liberal-leaning media. Frankly, if you want to know what he's about, you have to look beyond them. But what's even more disconcerting is the question of Obama's plans. What are they? He won't tell us. He'd rather have his surrogates talk about Mitt's wife, the so-called war on women and his class warfare.

No, it isn't Mycroft. I chose my candidate in early 2011 and do not watch the news or read newspapers. I'm not in the least concerned about Romney's POVs because I'll never vote for a bigot.
 
No, it isn't Mycroft. I chose my candidate in early 2011 and do not watch the news or read newspapers. I'm not in the least concerned about Romney's POVs because I'll never vote for a bigot.

Whatever Romney may be, he isn't a biggot.
 
No, it isn't Mycroft. I chose my candidate in early 2011 and do not watch the news or read newspapers. I'm not in the least concerned about Romney's POVs because I'll never vote for a bigot.

Okay...I understand.

I thought that when you said this: "This nauseating inquiry into Romney's personal life is distracting and annoying. What is Mitt's plan regarding the economy? Anyone know? Or are we just gonna chase shiney things around until November like a bunch of Pavlov's dogs?", you were wondering what his positions were...especially in light of the deflections of the Obama campaign and the deflections of the media.


BTW, since you characterize Romney as a bigot, I would suggest you actually DO some research on Romney. You might change your mind.
 
Okay...I understand.

I thought that when you said this: "This nauseating inquiry into Romney's personal life is distracting and annoying. What is Mitt's plan regarding the economy? Anyone know? Or are we just gonna chase shiney things around until November like a bunch of Pavlov's dogs?", you were wondering what his positions were...especially in light of the deflections of the Obama campaign and the deflections of the media.


BTW, since you characterize Romney as a bigot, I would suggest you actually DO some research on Romney. You might change your mind.

No thanks. I have a sprained back, a flowerbed that needs weeding, a kid coming for a visit soon....etc. Unless he dies, much as it pains me to do so, I'll be reelecting the big fat liar, Obama.

Yanno, SSDD?
 
My thoughts on the potential FLOTUS. While I do believe that she should be part of the conversation when dealing with Mitt and the election, I think it should be based on her words/actions. She has a voice in this election and we can't just ignore her. That being said, attacking her because she was a stay at home mom is just petty.
 
No, it isn't Mycroft. I chose my candidate in early 2011 and do not watch the news or read newspapers. I'm not in the least concerned about Romney's POVs because I'll never vote for a bigot.


Since you stated - "do not watch the news or read newspapers" - how did you choose your candiate? You're just sticking with the one you voted for in 2008?

Where'd you get your info on the candidates? How do you know what the issues are?

And again how'd you come up with the "bigot" theory on Romney?
 
This is something I have been agreeing with for some time, but I just found something out....

Romney has been defending his wife's wish to be a stay at home mom.... So far, no problem. But in January, he said this:



Apparently, it is OK for his wife to be a stay at home mom, but not OK for regular Americans. Now, as far as Ann Romney goes, this is not about her, and we shouldn't be jumping all over her for her decisions in life, which are just as valid as decisions made by any other American. But, apparently, Mitt Romney believes that the choice to be a stay at home mom is a privilege that should only be enjoyed by wives of billionaire elitist assholes like himself.

Oh yea, and Mitt wants the government to spend more money too. You sure he ain't really a Democrat billionaire elitist asshole? :mrgreen:

Dan, now provide the rest. Hes referring to mothers on public assistance. Your comment is so toolish you can pick it up off the shelf at Ace.

CONTEXT DAMMIT. Even the LA Times did a better job at the context than you did with your comment.

Romney’s remarks were in reference to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, which was created in 1996 as a part of welfare reform. Providing block grants to states, which are then intended to be directed to families in need, the number of families assisted by TANF has decreased from 68 for every 100 in poverty in 1996 to 27 for every 100 in 2010, according to a Center on Budget and Policy Priorities study. Along with allowing for the government to aide women in returning to the workplace, Romney also proposed a unemployment account set up by individual workers to serve as a form of insurance should they lose their jobs.

The Romney campaign defended the former Massachusetts governor’s remarks, citing the bipartisan nature of 1996’s welfare reforms.

"Moving welfare recipients into work was one of the basic principles of the bipartisan welfare reform legislation that President Clinton signed into law. The sad fact is that under President Obama the poverty rate among women rose to 14.5% in 2011, the highest rate in 17 years. The Obama administration's economic policies have been devastating to women and families," Amanda Henneberg, a Romney spokesperson said.

Romney’s remarks aren’t far removed from those made by President Bill Clinton, in a statement released August 22, 1996.

“Most important, this Act is tough on work. Not only does it include firm but fair work requirements, it provides $4 billion more in child care than the vetoed bills—so that parents can end their dependency on welfare and go to work—and maintains health and safety standards for day care providers,” Clinton said.
 
She seems very decent to me, I think she is a fine lady
 
As I said to megaprogman, you'll have to do me the favor of giving me some examples...you know, some mainstream network person attacking Michelle back then. I just don't remember any.

Are you ****ing kidding me? Just go to Youtube and type: "Fox Michelle Obama" and you'll find enough swill dished out by Fox News to fill a swimming pool.

 
Last edited:
She seems very decent to me, I think she is a fine lady

Seems like a very decent lady to me, too. I think she would make a fine frist lady. I just don't want her to be a candidate's main resource on the plight of working mothers. I'd say the same thing about my own mom.
 
Are you ****ing kidding me? Just go to Youtube and type: "Fox Michelle Obama" and you'll find enough swill dished out by Fox News to fill a swimming pool.

Adam, such as what? to me they layed off "Queen Michelle" , shes miserable anyway, but Fox gave her pass.. the only thing I can think of was her insane comment (twice) that "for the first time in her adult life she is proud of her country".. and this "lets move" BS is simply aweful propganda
 
She's not running for anything. I assume they have children, and she was a stay-at-home Mommy. Good for her, good for the kids.

Now the only people we'll consider eligible to become President have to be married to people with similar qualifications? Since when?

This nauseating inquiry into Romney's personal life is distracting and annoying. What is Mitt's plan regarding the economy? Anyone know? Or are we just gonna chase shiney things around until November like a bunch of Pavlov's dogs?
On the surface this might seem all like a reasonable request - until one realizes that back in early 2011, Mitt Romney and other Republicans were openly mocking Michelle Obama's attempts to focus public attention on child obseity in America.

Like Ann Romney, Michelle Onama isn't running for "anything" either, but that didn't stop Mitt and other members of the GOP from ridiculing her and viewing the plight of obese children in America as a "political football" to score cheap political points with the Republican faithfull!

Conservatives dig into Michelle Obama's anti-obesity campaign
February 26, 2011

Washington — Former First Ladies Barbara and Laura Bush worked to end illiteracy. Nancy Reagan famously took on teenage drug use. Lady Bird Johnson planted flowers. But none of them have been seared for something as seemingly benign as calling for kids to eat more vegetables, as Michelle Obama has.

Just about everyone will agree that the nation's children are getting fatter and that obesity is a serious health problem. But the first lady's push for healthier meals and more exercise, which marked its first anniversary this month, has provoked a backlash from the right, who complain that the only thing here that's supersized is Big Brother.

Critics have carped about Obama's spread at her Super Bowl party — and have suggested that the child-nutrition legislation she backed in Congress would bring about the end of school bake sales. Her work with the National Restaurant Assn. to develop healthier menu items has been decried in some circles as a government takeover of business.

And in January, some conservatives even suggested that Obama was endangering people, blaming an increase in pedestrian deaths on the first lady's campaign by saying that Americans were putting themselves at risk by walking more .....

Earlier this month, Mitt Romney, addressing the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, peppered his remarks with digs at the first lady and her husband.

Ridiculing President Obama's purported move toward the political center, Romney joked that the president's rhetoric had shifted so radically that "he sounded like he was going to dig up the first lady's organic garden to put in a Bob's Big Boy," Romney said.

Later, while equating Obama's economic policies to Marie Antoinette's purported line about the French peasantry — "Let them eat cake" — Romney corrected himself.

"I'm sorry," he crowed. "Organic cake."


http://articles.latimes.com/2011/feb/26/nation/la-na-michelle-obama-obesity-20110227
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom