• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Another open mike issue...will they never learn??

I don't get it. What's so bad about what he said?

theres nothing to get lol

you are right theres nothing bad about what he said, nothing that isnt absolutely made up and fantasy land
 
No, what he said was that after the election, nothing can stop him from getting rid of almost all of our nukes. That's what he meant, the socialist son of a bitch.
That's certainly a interesting translation, not rooted in reality, logic, or factual events but interesting nonetheless.
 
A missle shield not being built is disarming, but I can see why my comment made you think I was taking about something else. The problem Russia had with it us the missile locations and possibility of it being used offensively and neither party wants to seek weak during an election

Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk

Even though I agree with you I'm finding your post irritating because they come from your Tapatalk.

Sent from my badass laptop using ubuntu linux which is superior to xpiher's SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
 
For those who don't get it:

transparency.jpg
 
With the economy improving, the Republican presidential candidates are forced to pounce all over anything Obama says or does and make it an issue.

This is considered a weak Republican field of candidates and many of the "heavy hitters" have decided to wait it out until 2016.
 
Back
Top Bottom