• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Republicans enjoy 8 point enthusiasm advantage

The CBO said Obamacare is going to cost twice as advertised. That's not very exciting for Obama.
 
beerftw said:
how liberals work---they stick i key in an electric socket,they get shocked and then say we didnt stick it in enough.after attemot 185 the liberals say i know it failed 185 times but this time it will work.


how republicans work----the republican sees the democrat with his key and says omfg whats wrong with you its better to use a rusty nail.


ron paul walks in and points out they wouldnt get shocked if they werent sticking things in electric sockets.

:stooges
Click to expand...

... and then he goes on for another 90 minutes ranting about the gold standard, the trilateral commission, and isolationism, and everyone says, "damn, for a minute I almost forgot that the guy's ****in' nutz."
 
Neal N. Bloeme said:
The CBO said Obamacare is going to cost twice as advertised. That's not very exciting for Obama.
Click to expand...

What they said is that the net cost will be $48 billion lower than previously estimated. Somehow right wingers always miss that part.
 
Josie said:
That's quite a leap.
Click to expand...

Lesser of two evils is the only real choice Americans have. Too bad the founders didn't have the foresight to predict the rise of political parties

Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
 
This can't be good if you're a Republican.

PRINCETON, NJ -- A little more than one-third of Republicans say they would vote "enthusiastically" for either Mitt Romney or Rick Santorum if either candidate were to win their party's nomination for president. Slightly fewer say they would vote enthusiastically for Newt Gingrich. This level of enthusiasm is similar to Republicans' feelings about voting for Romney in early 2008, but lower than the enthusiasm level for that year's eventual GOP nominee, John McCain.

Romney, Santorum Stir Less Enthusiasm Than McCain Did
Click to expand...
 
xpiher said:
Lesser of two evils is the only real choice Americans have. Too bad the founders didn't have the foresight to predict the rise of political parties
Click to expand...

wha???

the founding fathers started our political parties.
 
AdamT said:
This can't be good if you're a Republican.
Click to expand...

it's not - although it is probably also a product of the primary. what are the comparable numbers for this point in the Obama/Hillary fight?
 
cpwill said:
it's not - although it is probably also a product of the primary. what are the comparable numbers for this point in the Obama/Hillary fight?
Click to expand...

That's a really good question. But whatever the answer is, McCain lost.
 
cpwill said:
it's not - although it is probably also a product of the primary. what are the comparable numbers for this point in the Obama/Hillary fight?
Click to expand...

Check the link. :)
 
cpwill said:
wha???

the founding fathers started our political parties.
Click to expand...

They designed the electoral system in a way to force presidental elections to be determined by the house and hoped that the house would be fragmented due to each state's difference.
To be clear, I agree with you that they stated it, but the system they designed want suppose to accommodate it.

Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom