- Joined
- Mar 5, 2008
- Messages
- 112,957
- Reaction score
- 60,487
- Location
- Sarasota Fla
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Well...it's not so much that I think Romney would be a great candidate against Obama. I think he'd be a weak-to-average candidate, at best. I just think that Gingrich, Santorum, and Ron Paul are all much more certain losses for the Republicans due to their bizarre views on certain issues and (in the case of Gingrich and Santorum) undisciplined campaigns. Romney isn't exactly endearing, but at least he is sane, which sets him apart from the other remaining Republican candidates.
As a Democrat, I'm personally rooting for Santorum, in order to guarantee Obama a victory. My ideal outcome would be a long, bloody Republican primary ending with Santorum eking out a majority of the delegates.
I think that the historical evidence is very strong that suggests that, all else being equal, candidates near the ideological center of the electorate tend to do better than candidates farther from the ideological center. I noticed that you compared Romney to John Kerry, which I think is a valid comparison...there certainly are a lot of similarities between them. But let's not overlook the fact that for all his lack of charisma, John Kerry came very close to unseating an incumbent Republican president, and probably would have succeeded if Bush's approval rating had been only 1% lower on Election Day 2004.
Realisitically, the only who who could come even remotely close to Obama in terms of money is Romney, and even then he would be at a severe disadvantage. A similar problem is that Obama is busy building a noce, strong campaign apparatus in every state. Only Romney is even close in that area. Republicans are at a strong disadvantage this cycle, and unless something major happens between now and election, it could be pretty ugly for the republican nominee in November. Intrade has Obama at a 63 % chance to win, and that is rising.