• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Photo ID's?

Sorry, i went back through most of your posts on this thread and found no such evidence. I searched the Internet and found much evidence to the contrary (pretty easy, since it is conventional wisdom that there is no problem here)

Evidence of voter fraud in US - Google Search

Policy Brief on the Truth About “Voter Fraud” | Brennan Center for Justice

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/washington/12fraud.html?pagewanted=all

Texas Voter ID Law Blocked By Justice Department | WBUR & NPR

http://www.bradblog.com/Docs/PoliticsofVoterFraudFinal.pdf

The idea of winning elections by making non-registered voters vote not only is contrary to all evidence, it defies reason. Do you know how hard that is to pull off such a conspiracy without being caught? You need A LOT of people, willing to commit a crime, each casting a single vote, which have to collectively work to change an outcome... that is a lot of votes, a lot of co-conspirators all which must stay quiet... seriously? How can anyone believe this...... The only real voter fraud is voter suppression, which is easy to do... like placing plenty of voting machines in one section of town that has the desired voters and few machines (so people stand in long lines) in sections of town where the vote wont go your way; or purging voter rolls for any number of reasons; or making people get voter ID cards because you know it disproportionately impacts those you don't want to vote (as was a basis of federal court overturning Texas ID law this month).

Brennan Center: 2008's Voter Suppression Incidents So Far | Election 2008 | AlterNet
Voter suppression - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Texas Voter ID Law Blocked By Justice Department | WBUR & NPR
Newsnation: Federal government rejects Texas voter ID law - Bing Videos

I also searched the Internet and found evidence supporting Obama was born in Keyna and 9/11 was an inside job.... it makes neither so, it just shows how many whack jobs there are out there that believe things like... voter fraud is problem that requires a solution.

911 was an inside job - Google Search

Obama was born in Keyna - Google Search
All biased sources or insufficient. Which is why I told you to google instead of providing a biased link, what you've provided is crap and sorely lacking. I could give you just as many links from commentary sites stating exactly my case, so either bring something neutral or answer my question, no more questions from you, answer mine or don't address me again.....ever. I'm tired of people trying to control dialogue instead of actually debating, none of you are good at doing so and it's annoying.
Last thing. The closest thing I found to a neutral source was information stating that the data on the subject itself is insufficient because all of it is skewed by political bias and seen through narrow viewpoints. Obviously in a situation like that states that want voter ID should keep their laws because frankly they know something we don't, and I have said I PERSONALLY know of a long dead family member that used to take money from both parties to cast votes for their candidates, they both went out paying for votes and my relative voted his conscience anyway. So yes, fraud occurs so either you are putting your head in the sand cause you KNOW it's true or you are not seeing it.

I didn't address you, so it's your responsibility to keep a debate going. I will not respond to anything less than proper debate.
 
Back
Top Bottom