Pres.Obama/Romney Presidential Debate, What question would you like to see asked?

I'd like to ask them "which one of you won't go to war ever other year or more?"

SypherAL said:

Governor Romney, John Kerry had trouble getting elected in 2004 because he was labeled a flip-flopper. How do your multiple stances on multiple issues differ from that of John Kerrys?

Click to expand...

Says Mr. Romney in answer: "Simple, Mr Kerry and I agreed that we would never agree on the same policy on the same day."

I would ask Romney how he would govern different from Obama. For Obama, I'd like to ask him about his affliliation with Bill Ayers who is an unreprentent terrorist but the liberal media will ask him something about how his kids are doing in school in order to make it so that he doesn't have to answer tough questions or as I call them GOP questions.

Derek said:

I would ask Romney how he would govern different from Obama. For Obama, I'd like to ask him about his affliliation with Bill Ayers who is an unreprentent terrorist but the liberal media will ask him something about how his kids are doing in school in order to make it so that he doesn't have to answer tough questions or as I call them GOP questions.

Click to expand...

I think you've hit here on the two miss givings that most middle class swing voters are struggling with in the 2012 election.

For Romney, we fear a RINO who will run on a conservative platform, but when in office, will capitulate on the tough key issues, such as repeal of Obamacare, leaving the country stuck in the economic stagnation rut of the "Grand Transformation".

For Obama, we are aghast that his promises that he was a post-racial, centrist reformer (aka, throw Rev. Wright under the bus ) turned out to be nothing but petty deceptions, and Obama, by his Actions, Policies, and Appointments has turned out to be a Most-Racial, Anti-American Radical.

And then we have the main stream press acting as umpire in a game which clearly has the Republican Team under hardball rules, while the Democrats are playing softball.

On the bright side, logic would say that despite biased coverage, the majority of the middle class, and hence the legitimate popular vote will likely be "Anyone But Obama".

Unfortunately, that won't be what will decide the election. The outcome of the 2012 election will be determined by how much Voter Fraud the Liberals are allowed to achieve. Which is why Eric Holders faux efforts to protect "minority voting rights" by blocking voter ID laws is central to the 2012 election. With a free, objective and un-biased Press being one of the major checks and balances against voter fraud, I am not hopeful.

Two Truths I've seen again and again over my 50 years:

Only Criminals and Tyrants Fear an armed citizenry.

Only those trying to deceive resist showing an ID.

Sparky said:

Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't most cases the child is born with birth defects due to incests?

Click to expand...

Rarely.. but lack of folic acid does create problems.

jonny5 said:

I dont have to prove it wrong. Forbes analysis is an opinion as well. I imply think its flawed. And are we talking about military spending or overall spending? Romney says he wants to cut overall spending.

Click to expand...

"GOP presidential hopefuls Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum are touting policies that would push the debt beyond current projections — largely because their proposed tax cuts would outweigh spending cuts. Only Ron Paul's plans would begin to sharply decrease the debt, according to a report Thursday from the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget."


Three GOP candidates' plans would increase debt, study says - Los Angeles Times

Mitt Romney: "According to projections based on the economic plans you laid out some months ago, the national deficit would rise over 2 Trillion in the next decade...How can you appeal to the growing concern of our national debt, and what actual cuts in spending would you make? I'm not asking about cuts to proposed future spending, but real concrete cuts."

President Obama: "You have agreed with and signed numerous executive orders/bills that clearly violate civil liberties for American citizens. In 2008, you ran on a campaign of hope and change but continued wars and unconstitutional laws. How are the American people going to truth your rhetoric in 2012 when most of what you promised in 2008 never occurred?"

Why didn't you demand the public option?

Kurmugeon said:

Words have defined meanings.

History is both professor and prophet.

Cynicism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The left will try to malign my points by distracting re-definitions of the statements I've made, but I'm not really trying to convince the Liberals of anything, they are corrupt beyond any redemption.

My goal is to highlight the threat America faces to the apathetic, independent middle to galvanize action while there is still a chance to prevent America's fall to the: "Grand Socialist Transformation ... Yes, yes, yes, We Can, if we are all obedient, sycophantic Yes-Men!"

I try to do this through humor, interesting debate prose, and occasionally subtle double entendre.

I am always amused when the left tries to accuse others of greed;
“The man with five purses tucked in his vest, is always the first to point and yell ‘Thief!’ ”

Click to expand...

Aww so we're not using the definition as commonly accepted, rather, we are using the ancient greek definition. That would have been good to know. A did pull out my dictionary and googled the word. I just didn't hang up on the ancient greek definition. The rest of your statement seems to fall quite neatly into how I would define a cynic.

Keep telling yourself anyone that doesn't agree with you is "corrupt beyond any redemption". It must feel good to be so holy. Hopefully you'll keep posting here, so we'll know what to think in order to be "right" about the next issue. Unfortunately for me, black and white doesn't usually add up. I have the same problem with right and left. Political ideology, much like religion, is cluttered by gray or center ideas that make sense. If you can't see past your color or side, you'll miss all the logic.

The guy stuffing purses in his vest is innocent until proven guilty. Those making millions and paying a 13% tax rate are guilty but proven innocent by a system and tax structure designed to facilitate the accumulation of wealth at the cost of average americans. FYI, my effective rate was 19%. I do not make millions or even hundred thousands!

Even if we agree the solution is not to "soak the rich", couldn't we start with even? Aww hell I must be stuffing purses in my vest.... or socialist... because I see this as an unacceptable perversion of our tax structure by the affluent. The best part is, without any discussion of where I fall on the wide range of political issues being discussed, you already have me tagged as a liberal - How cynical.

Your initial argument was at least debatable. Your response to me reveals your true colors.

How do you explain the birthers to your kids?

Derek said:

I would ask Romney how he would govern different from Obama. For Obama, I'd like to ask him about his affliliation with Bill Ayers who is an unreprentent terrorist but the liberal media will ask him something about how his kids are doing in school in order to make it so that he doesn't have to answer tough questions or as I call them GOP questions.

Click to expand...

So, you would basically waste America's time with questions that don't amount to a hill of beans - is that what you are saying you would do?

Bill Ayers? Why not toss in Rev. Wright, while you are at it?

And, don't stop there, put on a fake hairpiece and make like Donald Trump, by asking the President whether or not the ink on his birth certificate is real? Then go even further, and ask the President whether or not his marriage certificate is real? And, then take it all the home, right back to that dark seedy place in your mind where all things seem just peachy, and ask the President to prove once and for all - that he's definitely not a Muslim?

Why?

Because that's the kind of hard hitting questioning we want laid on the backside of our President.

It would make ole Rupert M., a very proud daddy to know that he and his fake new network has instantiated a groundswell of clueless members of our cherished national electorate.

Geeeepers.

To both of them:

Considering that bipartisanship is non existence in Washington, what will you do to bring the house and senate together? Considering that you will need both sides in order to improve conditions in this country.

I'd like to ask both the President, and the Candidate for the Presidency, three (3) very simple questions:


1)

What do you propose as structural legislative, fiscal and monetary policy solutions to the re-emergence in the future, of another 2008 economic crash?


2)

What lasting benefits to the American Taxpayer and to the overall health & stability of the United States Economy can you delineate, which are derived solely from the existence of the Federal Reserve Bank and its Fractional Reserve Policies & Protocols?


3)

As President of the United States and author of the national agenda, which of the following would be the most effective long term strategic path to pursue, in order to re-establish the United States Economy on firm footing here at home, and for being a highly competitive exporter of U.S. produced products to the global markets of the 21st century. Should the United States focus on:

a) Continuing to develop our current fossil fuel based economy?
b) Engaging in the development of a new alternative energy technology based economy?


The individual who answered these questions most accurately, would be the individual who secured my vote.

This question is to you both:

I'd like you to recall a time when circumstances completely beyond your control left you in a dire financial situation - to the point that you were worried about feeding your family from day to day. How did you get through that time and arrive at where you are today?

Kurmugeon said:

#2 - Mr. Romney is a successful man, one who started his life with little and made a fortune.

Click to expand...

If you think being born into the family of the CEO of one of the largest auto manufacturers in the country at the time - who went on to become Governor of Michigan and a Presidential candidate himself - starting life "with little," de salud! I have a friend who would love to talk to you about getting your business in his accounting firm.

You act like Romney hit a triple to make it to third base, when in actuality he got to first on a walk, got to second on a wild pitch, and got to third on a throwing error by the catcher.

Kurmugeon said:

If you could somehow get a question asked in a 2012 President Obama / Mitt Romney Debate, what question would you ask?

Click to expand...

When the hell are you two going to stop lying to the American public?

Id like to ask Obama if he thinks the ObamaCare is such a good thing, why did the then go issue waivers to unions and political contributors?

The one question I would ask to both men is this:

Do you support gay marriage and if you are going to defer the question to the individual states, should all other 49 states have to honor the gay marriage in the originating state and extend the benefits to the same-sex couple?

In my opinion; any question addressed to one man listed on this thread is a non-starter.

I wouldn't ask any questions, they're both career politicians, they lie. One must just take a chance on the one NOT the incumbent, because we already know how Ubama will govern.

rcart76 said:

To both of them:

Considering that bipartisanship is non existence in Washington, what will you do to bring the house and senate together? Considering that you will need both sides in order to improve conditions in this country.

Click to expand...

What makes you think that bipartisan ship is always a good thing?

Is not divided government unalbe to make changes which increase the burden of big government already suffering from a bad economic circumstance?