• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

2012 or Never

Who's your army? Considering you think that today's conservatives are not conservative enough and are basically liberals (ie democrat) then you've got about 90% of the population to kill murder.

Edit: btw, that 90% only includes democrats and conservatives...it does not include independents.

I figure that once the blood-letting started you'd have a large percentage of the people leave the country to begin with, and many of the other have a "change of heart". In reality I guess you'd be talking about actually doing away with about 15-20% of the population before you reached the tipping point.


....the domination of the white male is over.

Well, if the domination of the male is over (regardless of race), then society and our species are no longer relevant and we've become nothing more than an overgrown virus.
 
Last edited:
I figure that once the blood-letting started you'd have a large percentage of the people leave the country to begin with, and many of the other have a "change of heart". In reality I guess you'd be talking about actually doing away with about 15-20% of the population before you reached the tipping point....

and who the **** you think is gonna help you in your Holy War against Democrats?

sure, a few Neo-Nazis and Klansmen might want to assist, but that's not enough to do it.
 
and who the **** you think is gonna help you in your Holy War against Democrats?

sure, a few Neo-Nazis and Klansmen might want to assist, but that's not enough to do it.

You might be surprised to find how many people out there at this point (on the Conservative side at least) are getting VERY close to being willing to take up arms in this struggle and Liberalism in this country.
 
Some of us would rather LOSE an election standing on Principles than to win one by having to violate everything we actually believe in, Mickey. I understand that's not a very common philosophy but SOME of us do still believe in it.

Yea, it kinda shows where a liberals priorities are, doesn't it?
 
Wait, I thought 2008 was the death of the Republicans. When did it get moved back to 2012?
Im guessing the election of 2010 probably made some people at least reconsider the date a little bit.

The republicans could have easily won the upcoming election had they presented some actual viable candidates. The economy is still in the toilet, gas prices are in an ever increasing state of flux based on the the uncertainty in the ME and the current WH occutard is completely vacant and vapid with regard to foreign policy...so it isnt likely that is going to change any time soon. The debt continues to climb with no end in sight.

The only truly tragic part about all of this is that there are idiots on the left that believe that democrat 'rule' would be a 'good' thing. Mindless partisan utopia.Yes...that 4 year block of democrat house and senate ownership was SO very powerful and productive.
 
You might be surprised to find how many people out there at this point (on the Conservative side at least) are getting VERY close to being willing to take up arms in this struggle and Liberalism in this country.

Yep, it will eventualy come to that. Hope it's a long way out, but you've got to cull the herd, so to speak, now and again. It'll get violent sooner or later.

One day, secession will become a real topic as well.
 
Im guessing the election of 2010 probably made some people at least reconsider the date a little bit.

The republicans could have easily won the upcoming election had they presented some actual viable candidates. The economy is still in the toilet, gas prices are in an ever increasing state of flux based on the the uncertainty in the ME and the current WH occutard is completely vacant and vapid with regard to foreign policy...so it isnt likely that is going to change any time soon. The debt continues to climb with no end in sight.

The only truly tragic part about all of this is that there are idiots on the left that believe that democrat 'rule' would be a 'good' thing. Mindless partisan utopia.Yes...that 4 year block of democrat house and senate ownership was SO very powerful and productive.

If the Democrats keep the White House, then I would want the Republicans to at least keep the House and at least make the Senate 50-50. However, if the Republicans win the White House I would want them to lose the House and Senate to say around where it is now. Divided government is the best type I believe. Forces things to the center.
 
You might be surprised to find how many people out there at this point (on the Conservative side at least) are getting VERY close to being willing to take up arms in this struggle and Liberalism in this country.

and kill millions of Democrats? I don't think so.

I think you are projecting your own views, onto millions of people.
 
Last edited:
Yep, it will eventualy come to that. Hope it's a long way out, but you've got to cull the herd, so to speak, now and again. It'll get violent sooner or later....

so, you too wish to see millions of Democrats be killed? that's exactly what Tigger is saying.
 
No matter whether a dem or a republican is elected in the upcoming political season, our country is going to keep heading down the road toward serfdom, because no one with any real power in DC has the balls to start cutting back on the fiscal irresponsibility.
 
No matter whether a dem or a republican is elected in the upcoming political season, our country is going to keep heading down the road toward serfdom, because no one with any real power in DC has the balls to start cutting back on the fiscal irresponsibility.

It's not the serfdom I have a problem with. It's a matter that I would rather see a Conservative at the top of the foodchain when we get there than a Socialist.
 
You might be surprised to find how many people out there at this point (on the Conservative side at least) are getting VERY close to being willing to take up arms in this struggle and Liberalism in this country.

You won't have to worry about it. The results of economic liberalism will eventually die off by attrition and an inability to survive on its own merits. As for social liberalism, it will continue to exist in at least some form, for it's the basis on which this country was founded.
 
It's not the serfdom I have a problem with. It's a matter that I would rather see a Conservative at the top of the foodchain when we get there than a Socialist.

No, you don't want to see a conservative, you want to see an authoritarian. An authoritarian is not a conservative.
 
You might be surprised to find how many people out there at this point (on the Conservative side at least) are getting VERY close to being willing to take up arms in this struggle and Liberalism in this country.

Yep. Tea party conservative extremists have already tried to take matters into their own hands. Loughner is a prime example.
 
Last edited:
New opinon polls done show that Obama has a lead of 8% to 10% over any of his republican opponents. If this keeps up the republican candidates stand no chance to topple Obama.

I assume that means that the scare mongering about what Obama will do if re-elected will rise to fever-pitch levels in the coming weeks/months, especially on the "fair and balanced" channel I would assume ;)
 
New opinon polls done show that Obama has a lead of 8% to 10% over any of his republican opponents. If this keeps up the republican candidates stand no chance to topple Obama.

I assume that means that the scare mongering about what Obama will do if re-elected will rise to fever-pitch levels in the coming weeks/months, especially on the "fair and balanced" channel I would assume ;)

It's not Obama that is the problem. It's the whole damn bunch of them.
 
You won't have to worry about it. The results of economic liberalism will eventually die off by attrition and an inability to survive on its own merits. As for social liberalism, it will continue to exist in at least some form, for it's the basis on which this country was founded.

I don't suspect I'll live anywhere near long enough to see economic liberalism self-destruct and I have no use for social liberalism, regardless of its history.


No, you don't want to see a conservative, you want to see an authoritarian. An authoritarian is not a conservative.

Authoritarianism is the ULTIMATE form of Conservatism, TNE.
 
It's not Obama that is the problem. It's the whole damn bunch of them.

It is the almost like the republican party has a split personality, the possible voters on the one side who are reasonably moderate and the republican candidates on the other side which are mostly very very very not moderate.
 
Back
Top Bottom