The fact that the gov't forces businesses to do things they have no reason to get involved with. Okay, lets disect your claims here. 1) I have no problem with gov't regulating something like "arsenic dumping". When a business does something that harms others involuntarily, such as that, it should be regulated. 2) I have a problem with the FEDERAL gov't regulating workmans comp, yes. States should regulate it, and they do. Some states, (West VA comes to mind) have fully privatized their workers comp and it is a success.[/quote[
So you pick and choose what you think the Government should force business to do. Except when it comes to expanding rights and services, it's wrong to force them to do so?
Don't care how many women use it, the religion still teaches that it is wrong.
Religion also teaches us that it's wrong for women to be teachers. I don't see you getting all fussy about that. Seriously, the whole "religion teaches" us argument is ENTIRELY CRAP as there are so many things we flagrantly ignore from all sorts of religions. Our economy is based on deliberately ignoring "thou shall not covet your neighbors' goods." The fundamental basis of our economy is based on pretending one of the 10 Commandments does not exist. The notion that because religion says so is a good argument highlights an almost immeasurable amount of hypocrisy by the person using the argument.
You are basically creating your own religion by picking and choosing what you want to follow and what you want to ignore.
Also, would like to see a source of your 99% claim, just to tie that loose end up, thanks. The entire argument is that Catholic organizations will have to provide contraceptives to employees through their insurance. When you FORCE someone to buy and provide something they don't want to, that's wrong. I have no idea what you're talking about IRT penalizing people for doing things they previously were free to do.
Obama
By your logic, it's wrong to force a coal company to buy sulfur scrubbers to prevent acid rain because they didn't want to. Hint: this is just an example to prove your argument is hypocritical.
What the hell is the IRT?
Doesn't make it right. The proper thing to do would be change the law or abolish it no? The gov't should not be allowed to pick and choose laws to enforce. We do not have the right to pick and choose laws to follow do we? Two wrongs do not make a right, which is what you imply here.
So you are saying that the Government should enforce a law that is questionably unconstitutional? A law that the Justice Department itself called unconstitutional?
U.S. Justice Department argues that Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional
You do realize that you are asking the President to essentially ignore the oath he gave no? By requiring him to require the Justice Department to enforce a law that goes against the very document he promised to uphold?
No, it shouldn't be a law to begin with.
Well it's too late now.
Should I have refused to deploy to Iraq in 2003 because I thought Bush deployed us under unconstitutional circumstances? No, I shouldn't have. Your statement regarding seat belt laws reinforces my argument. Most liberals love laws that restrict people, as long as it goes along with their idea of right.
Actually it prevents you from turning into an airborne projectile that can harm other people. People not wearing selt-belts have been thrown from cars before. By that reasoning given your previous pro-laws that prevent harm to others, you must agree with it as well. Or you are a hypocrite who picks and chooses what he wants without any form of consistency whatsoever. And to correct your asinine comment most people love laws that restrict people, as long as it goes along with their idea of right.
You could also counter you seat belt law argument with the fact that some people have been burned in their car because their seatbelt wouldn't release. Or drowned because they couldn't get out of it. Right? There's always two sides to an argument, not just your way or no way.
See above human projectile.
Nah, still the same. Most liberals are hypocrites. Your post just helped me with proving that point. Thanks bro.
Only if you abandon logic entirely.
