• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

One Cheer for Romney.

Wessexman

Dorset Patriot
DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 8, 2008
Messages
8,468
Reaction score
1,575
Location
Sydney, Australia(but my heart is back in Dorset.)
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
I don't know if anyone is interested, but I quite enjoy Thomas Fleming's columns, as you can see he is extremely cranky, pessimistic and glib, in the Daily Mail and I liked his latest on Romney which includes advise and unenthusiastic quasi-support;

One Cheer for Romney - Mail Online - Thomas Fleming's blog

If Santorum fades, Romney will garner the support (albeit unenthusiastic) of the Christian Right. What he really needs is some of Ron Paul's supporters. It would be much too dangerous to put Ron on the ticket or even to promise him a cabinet position, but he can hijack some of his anti-government and foreign policy agenda, the way Richard Nixon hijacked George Wallace's populist agenda.


No, he should not come out as an anti-war peacenik libertarian or hire my friend Justin Raimondo (of Antiwar.com) as his speechwriter. And, no, he should not call for the abolition of the Federal Reserve or the elimination of all welfare programs. What he can do is to advocate severe fiscal restraint and a pragmatic foreign policy of national interest.


In domestic policy, all he needs to do is to ramp up a little his already well-defined opposition to deficit spending. He can throw a few bones to the libertarians--references to the Constition, though it is an entirely irrelevant document, and America's tradition of rugged individualism.


Fiscal restraint is the easy part, but he needs to back off from the GOP's warmongering rhetoric. Romney can praise Dr. Paul's single-minded devotion to peace, while reciting the Latin wheeze, "Si vis pacem, bellum para." He can praise George W. Bush as a patriotic statesman, but hint at criticisms of the bellicose neconservatives who have cost American taxpayers trillions of dollars in what now appear to be less than perfectly successful crusades.

You ask: "Would such a nuanced foreign policy conflict with Gov. Romney's principles?" You are obviously forgetting that Romney is a politician, and politicians don't have principles, only positions and sound-bytes designed to win elections.

He also claims that Santorum is not as consistent in his principles as is sometimes suggested, which may interest some.
 
Last edited:
Tongue-in-cheek praise at best.
 
Tongue-in-cheek praise at best.
Well I'm not sure he is joking that he would prefer Romney to Santorum or the rest of the field, except perhaps Ron Paul, or in his criticisms of the rest of the field.

I think it is more faint praise, indeed praise interspersed with attacks, than tongue in cheek.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom