• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Why does the media smear every Republican EXCEPT Romeny?

We've seen all the hit pieces against Gingrich these past couple weeks.

Before that, the hit pieces were on Herman Cain.

Before that, the hit pieces were on Perry.

Before that, the hit pieces were on Bachmann.

The ONLY candidate that the media never intentionally "smears" is Mitt Romney... and I want to know why.



I would expect there is either an agenda, or there is some money and under-the-table payments going on...

You're kidding, right? Romney gets called out for flip-flopping and for his past, and for MassCare.
 
I actually don't think smear campaigns will work on Romney anymore. His comments about him being a progressive didn't affect his poll number at all. More flip flopping will not affect his poll numbers, people support him just because they think he can win. The only thing that could hurt him now is a personal scandal.

However, the left is not attacking him, and they are attacking the other candidates more. That is because they believe he is going to be the candidate, so they want to wait with the ammunition.

The mainstream right is not attacking him either, because Karl Rove wants him to be nominated, and the different factions of the Tea Party have a tendency to destroy each other.

I don't think it has much to do with anybody deciding who to attack really. Obama has only been running ads against Romney and not bothering with the others so far, but that hasn't been a big factor for any of the candidates in their own primary. IMO its just that Romney is playing it much more cautiously. Where Gingrich or Bachmann or Paul or whathaveyou are trying to basically say as many shocking things as they can to tap into the extremists and get as many headlines as they can (which isn't a totally dumb strategy either), Romney is trying his hardest to avoid saying anything that will put people off. He makes a lot of statements that seem to indicate his general support for some position on something, but don't really take a remotely controversial stance. For example, his stance on immigration is that we should deport undocumented immigrants... The anti-illegal-immigration folks cheer for that, but really he isn't saying anything. Duh, every president we've had for 100 years has deported undocumented immigrants. That's not an actual position on the issue. He does a lot of that. That's why nobody is too excited about him, but nobody really hates him either.

Like in a given day the headlines might be "Romney says he will concentrate on creating jobs" and "Gingrich says we should start using child labor"... That isn't because somebody attacked Gingrich and they're going easy on Romney, it's because Gingrich is trying to be controversial and Romney is trying to be non-controversial.
 
Last edited:
We've seen all the hit pieces against Gingrich these past couple weeks.

Before that, the hit pieces were on Herman Cain.

Before that, the hit pieces were on Perry.

Before that, the hit pieces were on Bachmann.

The ONLY candidate that the media never intentionally "smears" is Mitt Romney... and I want to know why.



I would expect there is either an agenda, or there is some money and under-the-table payments going on...

They are all clowns. None of these people are, have been, nor ever will be serious candidates for POTUS. They are so easy to pick apart.... and then they fall by the wayside. If they were legitimate candidates, they would survive the scrutiny. If the quivers bounce off the armor, the media will give up; but when there is an easy kill at hand, as is this the case with this group, they are going to be killed.
 
Last edited:
We've seen all the hit pieces against Gingrich these past couple weeks.

Before that, the hit pieces were on Herman Cain.

Before that, the hit pieces were on Perry.

Before that, the hit pieces were on Bachmann.

The ONLY candidate that the media never intentionally "smears" is Mitt Romney... and I want to know why.



I would expect there is either an agenda, or there is some money and under-the-table payments going on...
There is this story about Romney still profiting from his time at Bain Capital.



Buyout Profits Keep Flowing to Romney

 
When it comes to "smears," Karl Rove and the Bush Campaign wrote the "book" and elevated it into a political "artform" when they "derailed" the McCain Campaign during the 2000 Republican Primary in South Carolina.

"Peter Grimm" and "Aunt Spiker" are deluding themselves if they think that its the "liberal" media and/or the Democrats who are orchestrating "smear" campaigns against any candidate who represents a serious threat to Romney getting the nomination.

The Republican "establishment" have already decided that Mitch is the only one of their "stable" of GOP candidates with any chance of defeating Obama in the 2012 General Election.

Despite the fact that Romney is considered too liberal by most Republican/Tea Party supporters, the GOP "establishment have made their decision that electibility trumps ideology, and that they will send out their Karl Rove "types" to undermine the campaign of any GOP candidate who gets in Romney's way.

Romney has groups running smear ads on Newt and funded smears on Cain until he self destructed.

I remember Romney blasting McCain as a career politician yet Romney is a career candidate. Romney would have been a career politician if he hadn't lost so many races. He's been a career candidate instead!
 
We've seen all the hit pieces against Gingrich these past couple weeks.

Before that, the hit pieces were on Herman Cain.

Before that, the hit pieces were on Perry.

Before that, the hit pieces were on Bachmann.

The ONLY candidate that the media never intentionally "smears" is Mitt Romney... and I want to know why.



I would expect there is either an agenda, or there is some money and under-the-table payments going on...

Must be a conspiracy by the Left wing and the Right wing media!!!! LOL!
 
Back
Top Bottom