• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Obama to win...by a landslide???

99percenter said:
10 Most Offensive Tea Party Signs And Extensive Photo Coverage From Tax Day Protests (PHOTOS)
Click to expand...
Okay, 1) I can't find a link to anything other than some kid's quotes and a Flickr account that shows people standing on a stage or with "Stop Global Whining" (lol) painted on their car B) You need to use a better, more middle of the road source than the Huffington Post. That would be like me citing the National Review Online or something.
I see you are an Occupy supporter (just guessing by your user name). Would you like to compare crimes committed by my organization against yours? I would be willing to bet that while liberals do not agree with anything the Tea Party stands for, they will agree that we are much better citizens in general than Occupiers are. I have never heard of rampant rape, drug use, or rioting in regards to a Tea Party protest. That seems to be part of the standard operating procedure with an Occupy protest.
 
Conservative said:
No matter how many times it is proven to you that you are wrong, you still spout the same liberal lies. it was a PROJECTED surplus, and Clinton added 1.3 trillion to the debt. Wonder what it is about liberalism that creates this kind of loyalty and ignorance of actual facts. Get away from the leftwing sites.
Click to expand...

Loyalty. Why are you loyal to bush when he amassed this huge deficit and gave a trillion dollars to wall st courtesy of the american tax payer.?
 
MarineTpartier said:
Okay, 1) I can't find a link to anything other than some kid's quotes and a Flickr account that shows people standing on a stage or with "Stop Global Whining" (lol) painted on their car B) You need to use a better, more middle of the road source than the Huffington Post. That would be like me citing the National Review Online or something.
I see you are an Occupy supporter (just guessing by your user name). Would you like to compare crimes committed by my organization against yours? I would be willing to bet that while liberals do not agree with anything the Tea Party stands for, they will agree that we are much better citizens in general than Occupiers are. I have never heard of rampant rape, drug use, or rioting in regards to a Tea Party protest. That seems to be part of the standard operating procedure with an Occupy protest.
Click to expand...

Crimes?? Lets not go there. A teabagger shot a congresswoman. you won't see an occupier doing that. And you should read more of those signs. Stop the muslim marxist" hows that not racist?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/34337264@N06/3901077480/in/photostream
 
99percenter said:
Loyalty. Why are you loyal to bush when he amassed this huge deficit and gave a trillion dollars to wall st courtesy of the american tax payer.?
Click to expand...

As has been posted over and over again, anyone worried about deficits cannot be an Obama supporter. Obama will amass in a little over 3 years as much debt as Bush did in 8 but your ideology will not allow you to admit or accept that. Absolutely amazing how brainwashed liberals are.
 
Conservative said:
As has been posted over and over again, anyone worried about deficits cannot be an Obama supporter. Obama will amass in a little over 3 years as much debt as Bush did in 8 but your ideology will not allow you to admit or accept that. Absolutely amazing how brainwashed liberals are.
Click to expand...

Nice dodge. I'll ask you again. Why are you loyal to bush when he amassed this huge deficit and gave a trillion dollars to wall st courtesy of the american tax payer.? You won't answer that because you aren't a "conservative.' You are a republican. So when you see unconservative things that repubs do like spend all this money, raise are taxes, and give illegals amnesty you will still support them. Bush is the worst president not only in US history, but the history of all first world democracies. Until you acknowledge that bush was a bad pres, you are nothing but a partisan hack. And your obama hasn't spent as much money in 3as bush spent in 8. Another lie from a brainwashed repub.
 
99percenter said:
Crimes?? Lets not go there. A teabagger shot a congresswoman. you won't see an occupier doing that. And you should read more of those signs. Stop the muslim marxist" hows that not racist?

Tea Party Express, South Bend/Mishawaka, IN part 2 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
Click to expand...
Get your facts straight bud. That shooter was later found to be a leftist by viewing his rambling Youtube videos. I don't need to argue the behavior of the Occupiers, that speaks for itself.
How is calling the President a muslim marxist racist? Muslim is not racial, its religious and Marxist is not racial, its an ideology? I gotta go somewhere with my family. That'll give you time to think of a real argument.
 
Conservative said:
Keep working hard and soon you can see America because as screwed up as Britain has become. how is that Sharia law working out for you?
Click to expand...

Just as the Jews are allowed to use their law in private cases (cheaper and designed to make peace) Muslims have a strong case for using Sharia law in similar circumstances, but they haven't caught up with the Jews yet. You tell me I know nothing about America: I can assure you that the usual drivel put about by American conservatives about the UK is unbelievably ignorant and laughable to anyone who lives here - but, then, I suppose no right-wingers are allowed out. That is wise from a diplomatic point of view, though it does stunt their intellectual development even further, doesn't it?.
 
MarineTpartier said:
Get your facts straight bud. That shooter was later found to be a leftist by viewing his rambling Youtube videos. I don't need to argue the behavior of the Occupiers, that speaks for itself.
How is calling the President a muslim marxist racist? Muslim is not racial, its religious and Marxist is not racial, its an ideology? I gotta go somewhere with my family. That'll give you time to think of a real argument.
Click to expand...

Lougner was and admitted teabagger that was inspired by sarah palin's map targeting gifford's district. But don't let facts get in your way. and calling the president muslim marxist isn't racist. Seriously. Do you even know what the definition of racism is? Maybe you can think about it in your time away.
 
99percenter said:
Lougner was and admitted teabagger that was inspired by sarah palin's map targeting gifford's district. But don't let facts get in your way. and calling the president muslim marxist isn't racist. Seriously. Do you even know what the definition of racism is? Maybe you can think about it in your time away.
Click to expand...
Call me a Christian Capitalist and see if I get offended
 
99percenter said:
Nice dodge. I'll ask you again. Why are you loyal to bush when he amassed this huge deficit and gave a trillion dollars to wall st courtesy of the american tax payer.? You won't answer that because you aren't a "conservative.' You are a republican. So when you see unconservative things that repubs do like spend all this money, raise are taxes, and give illegals amnesty you will still support them. Bush is the worst president not only in US history, but the history of all first world democracies. Until you acknowledge that bush was a bad pres, you are nothing but a partisan hack. And your obama hasn't spent as much money in 3as bush spent in 8. Another lie from a brainwashed repub.
Click to expand...

My loyalty is to accuracy and you couldn't be more false in your accusations. You make up things that suit your ideology. It doesn't matter what my position was on Bush, he isn't on the ballot and there is nothing that can be done about your perceptions as to what he did. your claim that Bush was the worst President in history is biased, partisan, and irrelevant. Obama is making Bush look good as NON PARTISAN sites show but those sites are of no interest to people like you. Suggest you get your head out of the leftwing sites and actual verify what you are being told. BEA.gov, BLS.gov, and the U.S. Treasury are excellent sites that provide non partisan data.

Obama took office with a 10.6 trillion dollar debt and it is at 15.1 trillion now. Bush had very little to do with that but it doesn't matter. The more you can divert from the Obama record the more likely you will get your wish, another 4 years. The question is why?
 
Penderyn said:
Just as the Jews are allowed to use their law in private cases (cheaper and designed to make peace) Muslims have a strong case for using Sharia law in similar circumstances, but they haven't caught up with the Jews yet. You tell me I know nothing about America: I can assure you that the usual drivel put about by American conservatives about the UK is unbelievably ignorant and laughable to anyone who lives here - but, then, I suppose no right-wingers are allowed out. That is wise from a diplomatic point of view, though it does stunt their intellectual development even further, doesn't it?.
Click to expand...

After spending 65 years in this country and having traveled to Europe I find your comments out of touch with reality. Diplomacy has no place circumventing local laws. The laws are the rules that govern civilized societies. you live in Britain you should love under British law, not Jewish law, Muslim law, or any other laws. Don't like it, leave
 
Conservative said:
My loyalty is to accuracy and you couldn't be more false in your accusations. You make up things that suit your ideology. It doesn't matter what my position was on Bush, he isn't on the ballot and there is nothing that can be done about your perceptions as to what he did. your claim that Bush was the worst President in history is biased, partisan, and irrelevant. Obama is making Bush look good as NON PARTISAN sites show but those sites are of no interest to people like you. Suggest you get your head out of the leftwing sites and actual verify what you are being told. BEA.gov, BLS.gov, and the U.S. Treasury are excellent sites that provide non partisan data.

Obama took office with a 10.6 trillion dollar debt and it is at 15.1 trillion now. Bush had very little to do with that but it doesn't matter. The more you can divert from the Obama record the more likely you will get your wish, another 4 years. The question is why?
Click to expand...

Again you prove your loyalty to bush. Why are you loyal to bush when he amassed this huge deficit and gave a trillion dollars to wall st courtesy of the american tax payer.? Answer that. You won't because you are a partisan hack.
 
99percenter said:
Again you prove your loyalty to bush. Why are you loyal to bush when he amassed this huge deficit and gave a trillion dollars to wall st courtesy of the american tax payer.? Answer that. You won't because you are a partisan hack.
Click to expand...

Why don't you ask your President why some of his biggest contributors were Wall Street since you hate Wall Street so much? Deficits are yearly so apparently Bush overspending is a problem but Obama's overspending isn't? You have selective outrage but keep up with the name calling.
 
Conservative said:
Why don't you ask your President why some of his biggest contributors were Wall Street since you hate Wall Street so much? Deficits are yearly so apparently Bush overspending is a problem but Obama's overspending isn't? You have selective outrage but keep up with the name calling.
Click to expand...

Why are you loyal to bush when he amassed this huge deficit and gave a trillion dollars to wall st courtesy of the american tax payer.?
 
99percenter said:
Why are you loyal to bush when he amassed this huge deficit and gave a trillion dollars to wall st courtesy of the american tax payer.?
Click to expand...

What is your obsession with loyalty to Bush and what relevance does it have today? Obama has been President for 3 years and has higher unemployment, a rising misery index, added more debt per year, a declining labor force and fewer people working than when he took office all at significant cost that you ignore? You sure have selective outrage all to divert from the Obama record.
 
Conservative said:
What is your obsession with loyalty to Bush and what relevance does it have today? Obama has been President for 3 years and has higher unemployment, a rising misery index, added more debt per year, a declining labor force and fewer people working than when he took office all at significant cost that you ignore? You sure have selective outrage all to divert from the Obama record.
Click to expand...

you refuse to answer the question. Until you admit that bush was a bad president, you are a partisan hack that will vote for anyone with an R attached to his or her name.
 
Last edited:
99percenter said:
you refuse to answer the question. Until you admit that bush was a bad president, you are a partisan hack that will vote for anyone with an R attached to his or her name.
Click to expand...

What purpose does it serve looking backwards? I'll bet I have voted for more Democrats than you have Republicans but the difference between the two of us is that I learned what a disaster liberalism is. it is going to take you some time but you will grow up too
 
Zyphlin said:
Yes, that's his quote, which is saying exactly what I stated he was saying during the campaign. That he has no issue with seeing us being there 50/100 years down the road in a similar capacity of Japan and South Korea. That doesn't mean we don't have a withdrawal, unless you're thinking we're still actively engaging in occupational activity in Japan and South Korea, which is ludicrous. Now, if you want to argue about his ACTUAL stance that is one thing, but clearly implying that John McCain was against withdrawal for 50 to 100 years is just not reality.

You clearly attempted to distort his statement to make it appear that he was all for keeping troop levels as they were, IE not withdrawing, for 50 to 100 years which is just utter and complete dishonest garbage. In the very quote you highlighted he showed clearly that he'd want a withdrawal, just as there was in South Korea and Japan, with simply a "presence" of some sort there 50 to 100 years from now if that presence isn't causing significant American deaths. That is an ENTIRELY different picture than you painted by stating he was against withdrawal and immediately stating that he would be fine with being there for 50 to 100 years.

Not agreeing with the Bush/Obama withdrawal timeline also != equal being against withdrawal as a general practice…but simply against that particular time line. Nor does it equal being okay with not withdrawing for 50 to 100 years. Your statement did not indicate that McCain had an issue with FULL withdrawal of every last troop, but rather with "withdrawal" period as a generalized thing, which is just factually and utterly incorrect.
Click to expand...

That's what I'm talking about! There is nothing dishonest in reiterating McCain, Bush, and Romney's desire to keep residual forces in Iraq. It is just another distinction between Obama and the GOP candidates.

McCain, Bush and now Romney all have been talking about leaving a residual force in Iraq as we have had in Japan and South Korea, which is one of the reasons we voted for Obama. Glad to see he lived up to his promise, by not doing what Bush and McCain and Romney wanted.

McCain recently confirmed that if he had become president, he would not be withdrawing all our troops as Obama did. Romney has also made it clear that he would leave troops in Iraq.
 
Conservative said:
Agree on what, a large central govt. forcing the taxpayers of a particular state to fund govt. jobs when Federal tax dollars run out?
Click to expand...

Nope, the majority of Americans agree on increasing revenues by eliminating the tax breaks for the rich, once again re-regulating banks on Wall Street, implementing the American Jobs Act, and eliminating subsidies for companies that outsource American jobs.
 
Catawba said:
Nope, the majority of Americans agree on increasing revenues by eliminating the tax breaks for the rich, once again re-regulating banks on Wall Street, implementing the American Jobs Act, and eliminating subsidies for companies that outsource American jobs.
Click to expand...

Increasing revenue for what, greater govt. spending? That is a lie and you know it. keep buying the liberal rhetoric. You really don't know how our economy works, do you?
 
Conservative said:
Increasing revenue for what, greater govt. spending? That is a lie and you know it. keep buying the liberal rhetoric. You really don't know how our economy works, do you?
Click to expand...

Increasing revenue for what?! How about for paying down the $10 trillion in debt that you wingnuts have socked us with?!
 
AdamT said:
Increasing revenue for what?! How about for paying down the $10 trillion in debt that you wingnuts have socked us with?!
Click to expand...

How about just operating on a balanced budget? What is the guarantee that increased revenue will be used to reduce the deficit or that it will even happen? You believe what you are told and not one economic prediction of Obama's has come true.
 
99percenter said:
What if someone called you a muslim maxist when your a christian?
Click to expand...
I would evaluate myself and see if I acted like one, which is what our President should do. When you go around the world apologizing to countries that have contributed to the death of US troops, my brothers, and you support policy that is in line with socialism and marxism, that's what happens. Again, that has nothing to do with race. A white person can be a muslim marxist the same as a black person can.
 
MarineTpartier said:
I would evaluate myself and see if I acted like one, which is what our President should do. When you go around the world apologizing to countries that have contributed to the death of US troops, my brothers, and you support policy that is in line with socialism and marxism, that's what happens. Again, that has nothing to do with race. A white person can be a muslim marxist the same as a black person can.
Click to expand...

So you are a racist just like the rest of the teabaggers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom