• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

If Donald Trump ran, would you vote for him?

For President of the Hair Club for Men? Sure. President of the US? Not a chance.
 
Nope. He lost me after his racist side came out. I no longer have any respect for The Donald. He is a racist ego tripping prick.
 
Trump is maybe 60% media creation. To most media driven Americans that makes Trumps candidacy valid. It doesn't matter what he had done or what he could do, as long as people know who he is there will be far too many Americans who believe that Trump is something more than caricature of himself.
 
If he ran and won. Prepare for Celebrity Vice President... Apprentice!

Dennis Rodman
Joan Rivers
Bret Micheal
Mitt Romney
Herman Cain
Newt Gingrich
Michelle Bachmann
Flava Flav
Snoop Dog
 
I would be very happy to vote for Trump
 
X Factor said:
Actually, I really warmed up to Mitt when he said he's give every state a waiver from participating in Obamacare. That'll be a big issue for me this year and next.
Click to expand...

But the states already have that option. It's written right in the health care law. Moreover, President Obama fast-tracked the waiver process for the states years before it was to be enacted. So, Mitts waiver promise is bogus! He can't give what's already being allowed under the current administration.

Can you say "red herring"? Or wouldl that be an empty promise given only to curry votes? You decide... :shrug:

Jetboogieman said:
I would vote for his hair. But not him.
Click to expand...

conservativeguy said:
If forced to vote for BO or Trump, I would stay home.
Click to expand...

lpast said:
That depends on who the alternative is....against ron paul...or a bachman...or a cain....I would vote for...
Click to expand...

The hair...definitely the hair. :mrgreen:

Jetboogieman said:
I'll double down.

Trumps hair can't be president cause it's made in China :lamo
Click to expand...

See!? Who can resist the doo, man?
 
Last edited:
Thorgasm said:
Let me improve this thread:

Ivanka-Trump-Hair-Photo-1.jpg
Click to expand...

Don't believe the hype! As the saying goes, "She got it from her momma!"

Ivonka got her good looks from her mother's gen pool...breast implants notwithstanding. (No way are those mammories hers; but that winning smile is all momma's!)
 
Objective Voice said:
But the states already have that option. It's written right in the health care law. Moreover, President Obama fast-tracked the waiver process for the states years before it was to be enacted. So, Mitts waiver promise is bogus! He can't give what's already being allowed under the current administration.
Click to expand...

In order for a waiver to be granted, the states must meet certain healthcare criteria. It's not an "exemption." Mitt's promise is still bogus, though. He's making it sound as if he's going to allow every state to exempt themselves. That's patently false. Bet he wishes he never said that.
 
Objective Voice said:
Don't believe the hype! As the saying goes, "She got it from her momma!"

Ivonka got her good looks from her mother's gen pool...breast implants notwithstanding. (No way are those mammories hers; but that winning smile is all momma's!)
Click to expand...

She's got it all...beauty, intelligence, grace and, it would seem, a good heart. I really like her.
 
Aunt Spiker said:
Oh yeah - because the government couldn't possibly entertain the idea of budgeting and spending the money they do have wisely. . . they just need more.
Click to expand...

Have you seen the deficit? They do need more. How could they need less and pay that deficit and future obligations? That is just silly to think that way.
 
Dont 'stay home'. Dont 'not vote'. Find a viable third party, independent, or wrote in someone and vote. It is critical that BOTH PARTIES understand the people arent just sitting back and ignoring them and are not going to keep supporting them blindly. For all the people that would not vote for Trump (and no...I would not either) are you REALLY pretending the current crop of clowns are doing better than what he would do? Are you really satisfied with your representatives and the direction the two majority parties have taken the country?
 
Thorgasm said:
Let me improve this thread:

Ivanka-Trump-Hair-Photo-1.jpg










Trump is not a financial genius. He's been broke twice. He is just good at borrowing money. Borrowing money is the last thing we need to do.
Click to expand...


Trump has never been broke personally...his corporations have gone broke...big difference....during trumps first bankruptcy where he put the trump casino properties up as collateral he was receiving a COURT set allowance of 470,000 a month for personal use...he has never gone bankrupt personally.
He went bankrupt to screw vendor creditors out of millions who worked and provided materials for the trump taj mahal...he came out smelling like a rose financially it was all a ploy to make millions..and it worked...
I remember distinctly when it happened...there was a big todo about trumps bankruptcy putting two companies out of business because they couldnt afford not to get paid...one was the chandelier maker who LOST millions and millions with the trump bankruptcy and a piano maker...a small company that couldnt take the loss...
 
Last edited:
VanceMack said:
Dont 'stay home'. Dont 'not vote'. Find a viable third party, independent, or wrote in someone and vote. It is critical that BOTH PARTIES understand the people arent just sitting back and ignoring them and are not going to keep supporting them blindly. For all the people that would not vote for Trump (and no...I would not either) are you REALLY pretending the current crop of clowns are doing better than what he would do? Are you really satisfied with your representatives and the direction the two majority parties have taken the country?
Click to expand...

Let me ask you a question vance...are the new 100 republican congressman doing ANYTHING but stonewalling anything getting done.....just by virtue of someone NEW being elected means nothing...even if they start out sincere..politics corrupts and the pressures are overwhelming...I dont see it as better since 2008 when a bunch of new democrats swooped in and failed...and now a new group of republicans swooped in Nov and are failing...
 
lpast said:
Let me ask you a question vance...are the new 100 republican congressman doing ANYTHING but stonewalling anything getting done.....just by virtue of someone NEW being elected means nothing...even if they start out sincere..politics corrupts and the pressures are overwhelming...I dont see it as better since 2008 when a bunch of new democrats swooped in and failed...and now a new group of republicans swooped in Nov and are failing...
Click to expand...
Some of them ARE doing what they said they would do. They are taking a stand on spending. EN masse? Nope. But then...you will have to point to where I suggested they WERE. I may have missed it. Both parties have spent your grandchildren into a 15.5 trillion dollar debt and thats guaranteed to continue to climb. BOTH parties. That we tolerate it...and in fact CELEBRATE ANY politicians role in that is reprehensible and speaks volumes...about the American voter and citizen in general.
 
No. And not because he's Donald Trump, per se, but more because I don't think he could ever be effective. The two-party establishment would band together and thwart everything he wanted to do.
 
VanceMack said:
Some of them ARE doing what they said they would do. They are taking a stand on spending. EN masse? Nope. But then...you will have to point to where I suggested they WERE. I may have missed it. Both parties have spent your grandchildren into a 15.5 trillion dollar debt and thats guaranteed to continue to climb. BOTH parties. That we tolerate it...and in fact CELEBRATE ANY politicians role in that is reprehensible and speaks volumes...about the American voter and citizen in general.
Click to expand...

They have done nothing, they have accomplished nothing...they are doing nothing but stonewalling for the rich not to get a penny tax increase at the expense and misery of millions of americans out of work and underemployed....
 
lpast said:
They have done nothing, they have accomplished nothing...they are doing nothing but stonewalling for the rich not to get a penny tax increase at the expense and misery of millions of americans out of work and underemployed....
Click to expand...
Slant much? Maybe they arent the ones stonewalling. Maybe its all the others that have come along LONG before the Tea Party type reps that ran up the massive debt and have gotten rich along with their lobbyist buddies? Maybe.,..since you are hell bent in making this be all about evil republicans...its the senate with that absolutely WORTHLESS Reid at the helm that is the problem...or hey...stonewalling...how about a dem controlled house, senate and white house that ran up 6 trillion in debt in less than 4 years? Or how about that same body and 'leadership that couldnt so much as SUBMIT a budget, let alone PASS one?
 
ClaytonMartin said:
A lot of what Trump had to say was really accurate and I did actually agree with his 'tax China' policy. The doubts I had on him though was that would he'd be able to fulfill his agenda.
What are you thoughts?
Click to expand...

No I would not vote him.He comes off as a douche,a birther-tard and tried to justify forcefully taking a little old lady's house he can have parking for limousines.
 
I'd vote fore the rabid wolverine that lives on his scalp before I would vote for the Donald.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom