• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Why is Washington Post going after Herman Cain?

Herman is what scares the liberals the most in the long run. He's the nigger who escaped the plantation, and now stands in the spotlight as a success, and they want him to get back on the plantation and be a good porch nigger like Belafonte. If even half of black America ever strays off the plantation, the Whigs will win an election before the Democrats ever do again.
 
nonpareil said:
Your ability to make sensible arguement is regressing, you are now at the level of not making sense. The searches doesn't yield anything that support any of your claims.
Click to expand...
That's because Washington post has fallen out of the search list since I wrote the post, because people are not reading Washington post. Also, notice that while you searched you cut it off at post 2, (post 3 is negative and from washington post) while on the other you cut it off at post 3. You are just making yourself difficult, and I see no reason to talk to difficult people who are just debating to win.

Try to search for herman cain "Washington Post" and you will see the proper results.
 
Last edited:
Hatuey said:
The resident political science failure chimes in. Do tell well to do fellow, do you know what Obama meant by messy democracy? I'll give you a clue, the same thing the other 43 guys have meant when they feel they're being road blocked by partisan politics. By the way, what are you going to be for Halloween?
Click to expand...

Moderator's Warning:
Do not do this
 
apdst said:
Because they're scared ****less that he'll win the nomination. It will throw all the, "yooze-a-racist" talking points right out the window, basically taking away any platform that Obama might have had.

The Libbos know that the only chance they have, is for the Republican candidate to be so distasteful to the independents and the Righties, that most of them will stay home and not vote.
Click to expand...
There is no one on either side of the political spectrum who is afraid of Herman Cain, in my opinion of course.
 
We should take Herman Cain advice on this situation.

 
Camlon said:
That's because Washington post has fallen out of the search list since I wrote the post, because people are not reading Washington post. Also, notice that while you searched you cut it off at post 2, (post 3 is negative and from washington post) while on the other you cut it off at post 3. You are just making yourself difficult, and I see no reason to talk to difficult people who are just debating to win.

Try to search for herman cain "Washington Post" and you will see the proper results.
Click to expand...


You are on a debating site, people debate to prove their arguement correct. Your arguement is not supported and instead of supporting it, you attack me instead. See how that goes? Whether you are conscious of it or not, you are being as "difficult" as almost everyone who visit this site. Get used to it.

I have searched the results and posted the articles since the first few posts, your claim is still unsupported. Also get used to people pointing this out to you when it is true, because that's what people do on debating sites.
 
Last edited:
nonpareil said:
You are on a debating site, people debate to prove their arguement correct. Your arguement is not supported and instead of supporting it, you attack me instead. See how that goes? Whether you are conscious of it or not, you are being as "difficult" as almost everyone who visit this site. Get used to it.

I have searched the results and posted the articles since the first few posts, your claim is still unsupported. Also get used to people pointing this out to you when it is true, because that's what people do on debating sites.
Click to expand...
I supported my argument, then you saw the results, and decided to cut it off at post 2, because number 3 was from Washington Post and was negative.

You are just trying to be difficult, and I see no reason to debate this further with you.
 
Eighty Deuce said:
Herman is what scares the liberals the most in the long run. He's the nigger who escaped the plantation, and now stands in the spotlight as a success, and they want him to get back on the plantation and be a good porch nigger like Belafonte. If even half of black America ever strays off the plantation, the Whigs will win an election before the Democrats ever do again.
Click to expand...

I'd feel like I had a bit of egg on my face after a statement like this given all that's happened.
 
Karl said:
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter." -- attributed to Sir Winston Churchill.
Click to expand...


[FONT=Arial, Tahoma, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif]Boy you got that right … the educated voter is so far outnumbered by those voters voting for who will give them the most in hand outs .. . that there is nearly no chance for this country to turn it around. [/FONT]


[FONT=Arial, Tahoma, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif]All you have to do to get elected, is what Obama did in 2008... promise those that pay nothing in federal income tax …. that they are going to get more from the government .. convince those that contribute little or nothing.... that they are going to get even more at the expense of someone else .. that number is at 47% now .. work hard to get it over 50% and elections are locked up..... and our country as we know it is lost.[/FONT]
 
The Barbarian said:
Boy you got that right … the educated voter is so far outnumbered by those voters voting for who will give them the most in hand outs .. . that there is nearly no chance for this country to turn it around.


All you have to do to get elected, is what Obama did in 2008... promise those that pay nothing in federal income tax …. that they are going to get more from the government .. convince those that contribute little or nothing.... that they are going to get even more at the expense of someone else .. that number is at 47% now .. work hard to get it over 50% and elections are locked up..... and our country as we know it is lost.
Click to expand...

So you were against extending the Bush tax cuts?
 
The Barbarian said:
[FONT=Arial, Tahoma, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif]Boy you got that right … the educated voter is so far outnumbered by those voters voting for who will give them the most in hand outs .. . that there is nearly no chance for this country to turn it around. [/FONT]


[FONT=Arial, Tahoma, Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif]All you have to do to get elected, is what Obama did in 2008... promise those that pay nothing in federal income tax …. that they are going to get more from the government .. convince those that contribute little or nothing.... that they are going to get even more at the expense of someone else .. that number is at 47% now .. work hard to get it over 50% and elections are locked up..... and our country as we know it is lost.[/FONT]
Click to expand...

This statement insinuates that anyone on Social Security, or Medicare, or medicaid etc just votes for someone who is going to vote in congress to give them more....let me tell you something...the rich do the SAME THING...they vote for who is going to give them tax cuts and cut their regulations and preserve whatever it is that benefits them and enhances their riches. Its a two way street.
 
It is fun for news media to catch people in lies. Herman Cain is telling a bunch of lies. He has a right to remain silent, but Herman Cain is a talk show host, so it is difficult for him to keep quiet. When running for President, you are supposed to explain, and have an Answer for Everything.

One problem for Herman Cain to admit these accusations are true, would open him up to lawsuits, that would take away the money he is making on his book sales. More settlements would encourage more women to come forward. That was Bill Clinton's fear, that more women would come forward, if he admitted some misdeeds in some lawsuits. So Bill and Herman lied to keep their privacy. Liars make good media targets.



//
 
Gladiator said:
It is fun for news media to catch people in lies. Herman Cain is telling a bunch of lies. He has a right to remain silent, but Herman Cain is a talk show host, so it is difficult for him to keep quiet. When running for President, you are supposed to explain, and have an Answer for Everything.

One problem for Herman Cain to admit these accusations are true, would open him up to lawsuits, that would take away the money he is making on his book sales. More settlements would encourage more women to come forward. That was Bill Clinton's fear, that more women would come forward, if he admitted some misdeeds in some lawsuits. So Bill and Herman lied to keep their privacy. Liars make good media targets.



//
Click to expand...


Everyone knows that Herman Cain is lieing and not all the women are lieing...its just some will defend him knowing hes not lily white clean
 
lpast said:
Everyone knows that Herman Cain is lieing and not all the women are lieing...its just some will defend him knowing hes not lily white clean
Click to expand...

I just love how so many rushed in saying these allegations only surfaced because he was black... :lamo

Oh that was a hoot.
 
winston53660 said:
So you were against extending the Bush tax cuts?
Click to expand...


Yes as a matter of fact I was, all of them ... . but it seems the democrats weren't ... because it was them that extended them for two years ... if it had not been brought up for a vote .. they would have expired ... .and the only ones that could bring it up for a vote was the Democrats .. do you understand and agree with that ??
 
lpast said:
This statement insinuates that anyone on Social Security, or Medicare, or medicaid etc just votes for someone who is going to vote in congress to give them more....let me tell you something...the rich do the SAME THING...they vote for who is going to give them tax cuts and cut their regulations and preserve whatever it is that benefits them and enhances their riches. Its a two way street.
Click to expand...

*LOL* two way street ??? the rich according to the President is only 5% of the population ..... I'm talking about the 47% that pay nothing in FIT.... lets see do I pander to 5% of the voters .. or to 47% of them .... tough choice huh ??
 
Karl said:
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter." -- attributed to Sir Winston Churchill.
Click to expand...
"The best argument against socialism is Russia." -- Me
 
Camlon said:
This is clearly not defined to Washinton Post, but they have been the ones criticizing Cain the most.

Herman Cain and the race card; - The Washington Post
The GOP cynical embrace of Herman Cain - The Washington Post
Herman Cain is Republican flavor of month. Who will be next? - The Washington Post
Herman Cain, the new man in the middle - The Plum Line - The Washington Post
Stand up to Herman Cain's bigotry - The Washington Post

They tell us, he has no chance of winning. Then why do they focus so much time on criticizing Herman Cain? If they are just criticizing candidates they think are bigots, then why not Michelle Bachmann and Rick Santorum which have come with much worse comments. If they don't think there is any chance he will win, shouldn't they focus on Mitt Romney who they do think are going to win the nomination?

I think they are scared of him, because many liberals have been convinced that the Tea Party is racists. If they nominate a black man, the myth will get crushed.
Click to expand...
There are good reasons why 85 to 95% of Blacks consistently vote Democratic - even before Barrack Obama arrived on the scene.
 
jgarden47 said:
There are good reasons why 85 to 95% of Blacks consistently vote Democratic - even before Barrack Obama arrived on the scene.
Click to expand...
It's not about black people. If Herman Cain was a good candidate, then he wouldn't get very much of the black vote.

What I said was that many liberals have been convinced that the Tea Party is racists. If they nominate a black man, the myth will get crushed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom