View Single Post
Old 12-24-05, 03:05 PM   #27 (permalink)
independent_thinker2002
Secret Blogger
Dungeon Master


 
independent_thinker2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Last Online: 11-20-08 04:47 PM
Location: Nation of Whiners
Posts: 19,682
Thanks: 4,358
Thanked 2,651 Times in 1,898 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Devilish
Re: Society's stupid labels on sexy women

Quote:
Originally Posted by mixedmedia
Yes, you could. For this piece of tripe below......


The real translation: Guys are nice until you stop "putting up" on a regular basis.



Oh, please. You're going to tell me that men are forced by women to buy Playboy, Maxim, etc.? The women in those mags look that way because that is what guys respond to. In comparison, women's magazines (if you're talking about fashion magazines) give much more leeway to the variety & "mode of attractiveness" of the women who are afforded the spotlight.

BUT, it is no myth that the "industry of beauty" was designed and built by men on the insecurities of women and their desire to be attractive to the opposite sex. Which, I believe, is a normal, biological happenstance.
I prefer "Perfect 10". It is a magazine with all-natural women with undoctored photos. I actually do enjoy the Playboy articles. Their pictures of plastic vixens who have been doctored has gotten really old. If you have seen one Playboy picture lately, you have seen them all.

Yes, Cosmo puts plus size models on their covers without airbrushing the photos, my bad. Now it is gay men's fault for the "industry of beauty" using women's insecurities. Tell me more. It is women who buys those rags, are you going to say that men force them to do so?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Navy Pride View Post
Hell I could probably beat McCain.....
==]:{o
independent_thinker2002 is offline