Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldenboy219  You are so full of a bull**** agenda. Not only FOS, but you are giving out potentially harmful diet advice, so i would appriciate it if you would cut it out... source 1
I have no idea where you get this "less than 10%" garbage but i have little doubt it comes from one of the very bias sources you seem to find. One should never heavily disrupt cholesterol homeostasis unless directed by a physician. You speak as if reducing the big three is a guarantee or necessary to prevent coronary heart disease.
Not to mention, genetics play a major role in obesity, heart disease, and high HDL levels. Elsevier Article Locator
BTW, i am not, nor have not saying/said a high fat/calorie diet is to be a health requirement... |
Your advice is great though, right? You said people needed to ingest a non-essential amino acid, and you said cholesterol is required in our diets. Both are completely wrong. I showed you the proof on your cholesterol claim, from 3 unbiased sources, and you evidently ignored it.
Feel free to show me what you think the protein content in human breast milk is. Anytime.
The rat study information you cite shows what happens when baby rats get a fraction of the protein they require. Obviously, that would be very bad for the health of the baby rats. Duh...
The same would happen to humans if you fed them a fraction of the protein
they need. Again, duh.
But nobody here is saying humans should be protein-deprived, so the study you cite is irrelevant here.