Debate Politics Forums - View Single Post - This liberal claims mainstream media is conserverative

Jlinkos · 07-19-08, 07:28 PM

sent to me on July 18, 2008

you are such a brainwashed dork

Tha fact that not once but twice you have written making $215,000 a year does not make you rich shows how utterly stupid you are. I don't make half that and have all the bills you talk about. People who make $25,000 a year have those bills, this is just further proof that if the talking points from fox don't fit you are lost. The super rich have used their media to cloud your brain so bad you can't reason logically... The avg US household earns less than $50,000 as of 2006. Someone making $215,000 a year is rich. Stupid

History has shown nothing of the sort when it comes to taxing the rich. When the wealthy get tax breaks more money is printed to make up the shortfall causing inflation. Demand sets prices stupid not taxes. Corporations in Europe earn about 20% less profit because of taxes. If they just pass taxes on why do the European corps make less?

The rich/corps are paying the least amount of taxes in history and this country is broke. To write history shows... over and over when it clearly shows the opposite is brainwashed behavior. I know you will just claim the current conservatives aren't really conservatives but you are wrong. The current conservatives are true US conservatives. The people who claim they are not are just the gullible fools who put them in power.

The last time US conservatives got in charge of all branches of gov't they ushered in a gilded age and caused the great depression. Look it up. The Great Depression was the last time Republicans were in charge of both houses of congress and the presidency. 2000 was the first time since the Great Depression that Republicans were again in charge of everything and the Greatest Depression is just starting. Every time conservatives get completly in control they cause a depression. The "liberals" ran the whole show (both houses of congress and the presidency) from the mid 30's to the mid 70's history shows those were pretty good decades for the USA. The whole idea of US style conservativism is foisted upon stupid, gullible, and easily brainwashed people by the bankers using the corporate media.

Did you know that all The US Democratic party platforms planks are more to the right of every European major conservative party? European conservatives know US Democrats are right wingers. Only in the USA are the Corps allowed to own media as well as other buisnesses. Claiming Obama or almost any Dem is liberal is just more brainwashed talk. The product the US media gives is not liberal. You just think it is because you watch Fox which is ubber right but you are so dumb you think it is moderate.

A true liberal media would rally against the FED. In fact this used to happen 30 yrs ago before Reagan broke the trusts. Todays major media is all about hanging onto the staus quo and that in no way can be construed liberal.

Just because your heroes (and they are your heroes your comments prove it, in fact you are worse than the screaming idiot who stated this whole thing) at Fox say the media is liberal does not mean its true. It just means you are dumb for believing them.

One last time. The fact that you pointed out 4 or 5 times when the media hoisted prolonged attacks on Obama does not prove liberal bias. Your whole timline argument is straw. The stories were not suppressed. You have offered no evidense anyone tried to supress them. If these stories were on a right wing website that offered ironclad proof and the main stream media ignored them then you would have proof of a liberal media. The fact these nonsense stories were in the media at all proves my point. Why is that so hard for you to understand? If they were such important stories why did Obama still win?

Also I never once heard the mainstream media take McCain's 100 yrs comment out of context. In fact all reports in the main stream went out of their way to clarify it with his remarks about US soidiers still in Korea and Germany. Find me some Mainstream Media that does not clarify the facts of his statement. No news link you have put up yet is mainstream media. The reason you can't find the mainstream on Stephanopulus' supposed critism is because bloggers on the left and right blew it out of proportion just like they did to McCain's comment. Almost nothing on the web is mainstream media.

You are proof that the effort the FED put into controlling the media was time well spent.

07-19-08, 07:28 PM	#10 (permalink)
Jlinkos User Join Date: Jul 2008 Last Online: 07-20-08 03:05 PM Posts: 13 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Lean: Moderate Gender:	Re: This liberal claims mainstream media is conserverative sent to me on July 18, 2008 you are such a brainwashed dork Tha fact that not once but twice you have written making $215,000 a year does not make you rich shows how utterly stupid you are. I don't make half that and have all the bills you talk about. People who make $25,000 a year have those bills, this is just further proof that if the talking points from fox don't fit you are lost. The super rich have used their media to cloud your brain so bad you can't reason logically... The avg US household earns less than $50,000 as of 2006. Someone making $215,000 a year is rich. Stupid History has shown nothing of the sort when it comes to taxing the rich. When the wealthy get tax breaks more money is printed to make up the shortfall causing inflation. Demand sets prices stupid not taxes. Corporations in Europe earn about 20% less profit because of taxes. If they just pass taxes on why do the European corps make less? The rich/corps are paying the least amount of taxes in history and this country is broke. To write history shows... over and over when it clearly shows the opposite is brainwashed behavior. I know you will just claim the current conservatives aren't really conservatives but you are wrong. The current conservatives are true US conservatives. The people who claim they are not are just the gullible fools who put them in power. The last time US conservatives got in charge of all branches of gov't they ushered in a gilded age and caused the great depression. Look it up. The Great Depression was the last time Republicans were in charge of both houses of congress and the presidency. 2000 was the first time since the Great Depression that Republicans were again in charge of everything and the Greatest Depression is just starting. Every time conservatives get completly in control they cause a depression. The "liberals" ran the whole show (both houses of congress and the presidency) from the mid 30's to the mid 70's history shows those were pretty good decades for the USA. The whole idea of US style conservativism is foisted upon stupid, gullible, and easily brainwashed people by the bankers using the corporate media. Did you know that all The US Democratic party platforms planks are more to the right of every European major conservative party? European conservatives know US Democrats are right wingers. Only in the USA are the Corps allowed to own media as well as other buisnesses. Claiming Obama or almost any Dem is liberal is just more brainwashed talk. The product the US media gives is not liberal. You just think it is because you watch Fox which is ubber right but you are so dumb you think it is moderate. A true liberal media would rally against the FED. In fact this used to happen 30 yrs ago before Reagan broke the trusts. Todays major media is all about hanging onto the staus quo and that in no way can be construed liberal. Just because your heroes (and they are your heroes your comments prove it, in fact you are worse than the screaming idiot who stated this whole thing) at Fox say the media is liberal does not mean its true. It just means you are dumb for believing them. One last time. The fact that you pointed out 4 or 5 times when the media hoisted prolonged attacks on Obama does not prove liberal bias. Your whole timline argument is straw. The stories were not suppressed. You have offered no evidense anyone tried to supress them. If these stories were on a right wing website that offered ironclad proof and the main stream media ignored them then you would have proof of a liberal media. The fact these nonsense stories were in the media at all proves my point. Why is that so hard for you to understand? If they were such important stories why did Obama still win? Also I never once heard the mainstream media take McCain's 100 yrs comment out of context. In fact all reports in the main stream went out of their way to clarify it with his remarks about US soidiers still in Korea and Germany. Find me some Mainstream Media that does not clarify the facts of his statement. No news link you have put up yet is mainstream media. The reason you can't find the mainstream on Stephanopulus' supposed critism is because bloggers on the left and right blew it out of proportion just like they did to McCain's comment. Almost nothing on the web is mainstream media. You are proof that the effort the FED put into controlling the media was time well spent.