| Re: Gore sets 'moon shot' goal on climate change
The word "audacious" shows how objective the author of the article is.
10 years really isn't that practical, but the over all idea is a good one. I don't think the U.S. could replace its energy needs with those methods, but it could sure as hell help out. Even if those sources could produce 10% of the needed energy, then the extra supply of fossil fuels would lower prices. The supply of natural energy is never ending.
Too bad big oil would never let this happen. |