View Single Post
Old 07-18-08, 08:57 AM   #59 (permalink)
Reverend_Hellh0und
the Right Reverend......




 
Reverend_Hellh0und's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Last Online: Yesterday 11:54 PM
Location: 1.20.13
Posts: 15,478
Thanks: 1,288
Thanked 2,176 Times in 1,567 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Air Force:  Served honorably from 1990-1998. Gulf War vet. 

Current Mood:
Yeehaw
Thread Starter Re: Obama's plan for "defense" you work for free

Quote:
Originally Posted by rsixing View Post
How about Homeland Security managing them.

Anyhoo...

Not the same, as one FEMA manages disasters, including coordinating the locals.


Quote:
IMO FEMA is so outdated and mismanaged now how could we ever have confidence in them to manage what most likely will be a very large pool of on-call volunteers? That said the way I see this is rather then volunteers just showing up there will be a call-up, such as we used to receive for activations, and those called will respond on that basis. Seems like a very wise management system particularly given your cogent point above.


So should we disband FEMA and start from scratch? Or just disband them altogether?


My point in this thread is that evey president it seems not just obama wants to start the next "peace corp". To me it is pathetically transparent and just adds bloat for legacy building.

Why do we need a federal agency to essentially do what is a state issue?
__________________
كافر[size="4"]
Reverend_Hellh0und is offline   Reply With Quote