Quote:
Originally Posted by Goobieman  |
Dishonest post, Goobieman. Please post the precise quote from the article where Obama says it is OK to lose in Iraq. And not your "interpretation", which is nothing more than "interpretation". Precise words.
If you want to debate what Obama meant by:
Quote:
|
Obama said his White House rival, Sen. John McCain, "has argued that the gains of the surge mean that I should change my commitment to end the war. But this argument misconstrues what is necessary to succeed in Iraq, and stubbornly ignores the facts of the broader strategic picture that we face."
|
or
Quote:
|
"This war distracts us from every threat that we face and so many opportunities we could seize. This war diminishes our security, our standing in the world, our military, our economy, and the resources that we need to confront the challenges of the 21st century. By any measure, our single-minded and open-ended focus on Iraq is not a sound strategy for keeping America safe.
|
then that's one thing. But, nowhere does he even imply "losing".
And as far as your "questions" go, since Obama never stated these things, your "questions" are an example of the "when did you hit your wife" (complex question) logical fallacy, and therefore non-relevant to the article, and yet another in the long series of attempted Goobieman "trap" threads, that I constantly must expose.
