View Single Post
Old 07-17-08, 07:18 PM   #54 (permalink)
rsixing
Sportbike Fanatic

 
rsixing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Last Online: Yesterday 10:01 AM
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,324
Thanks: 599
Thanked 505 Times in 364 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Male

Awards:
US National Guard Army:  9 years of service in Oregon. US Army:  12 years of active service. 

Current Mood:
Vilified
Re: Obama's plan for "defense" you work for free

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reverend_Hellh0und View Post
Yes we can. There is such a thing as too many volunteers.

Take a look at NOLO, a lack of volunteers was not the issue. They turned people back. Remember the news telling people NOT to go there to help?




I don't think another government program is the answer. I think it will be FEMA II, and just as effective.


And why can't FEMA (remember what the M stands for?) MANAGE these volunteers?

Well simple, cause then Obama can't pretend he's doing something
How about Homeland Security managing them.

Anyhoo...

IMO FEMA is so outdated and mismanaged now how could we ever have confidence in them to manage what most likely will be a very large pool of on-call volunteers? That said the way I see this is rather then volunteers just showing up there will be a call-up, such as we used to receive for activations, and those called will respond on that basis. Seems like a very wise management system particularly given your cogent point above.
rsixing is offline   Reply With Quote