557. The development of Iran affair (7/9/08)
On 6/30 and 7/1, State Secretary Condoleezza Rice had a lightening visit to China. So I knew there was a new secret deal signed by China and US secret police. There was a quick result of that deal: On 7/3, White House announced that Bush would attend the opening ceremony of Olympic in Beijing. Other world leaders, such like Merkel of Germany and Gordon Brown of Britain, are skipping the opening ceremony to protest China's violation on human rights in Tibet and Sudan.
The main purpose of the secret deal is to continue to frame a drug case. Does it include that China will support Iran war?
Quietly, US is preparing for another Mid-east war.
Quote, "Iran War Resolution May Be Passed Next Week
June 23, 2008 by Eric Garris
Introduced less than a month ago, Resolution 362 <http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=hc110-362>, also known as the Iran War Resolution, could be passed by the House as early as next week.
The bill is the chief legislative priority of AIPAC. On its Web site, AIPAC endorses the resolutions as a way to ”Stop Iran’s Nuclear Program” <http://aipac.org/694.asp> and tells readers to lobby Congress to pass the bill. In the Senate, a sister resolution, Resolution 580 <http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sr110-580>, has gained co-sponsors with similar speed. The Senate measure was introduced by Indiana Democrat Evan Bayh on June 2. It has since gained 19 co-sponsors.
The bill’s key section “demands that the president initiate an international effort to immediately and dramatically increase the economic, political, and diplomatic pressure on Iran to verifiably suspend its nuclear enrichment activities by, inter alia, prohibiting the export to Iran of all refined petroleum products; imposing stringent inspection requirements on all persons, vehicles, ships, planes, trains, and cargo entering or departing Iran; and prohibiting the international movement of all Iranian officials not involved in negotiating the suspension of Iran’s nuclear program.”
Antiwar.com Blog Iran War Resolution May Be Passed Next Week
Iran surely has felt the approaching danger and made a response on July 4th.
Quote, "Iran responds to nuclear package
Friday, July 04, 2008
Iran has responded to a packages of incentives offered by six world powers aimed at resolving a standoff over its disputed nuclear ambitions, according to the official IRNA news agency.
Al Jazeera English - Middle East - Iran responds to nuclear package
Iran's constructive preliminary response is positive. But it's a dismay to warmonger. They lose an important excuse to start a war. It disturbs their war schedule. So US media treat the news with a low key and drop the news in the corner. However, the market reaction is inspiring. From 7/5 to 7/8, the oil price dropped for four days from $145 to $136 a barrel. .
558. D.A.'s discipline case and hiding evidence (7/9/08)
On 5/11, I returned the hundred notes to my relatives when they visited me. They later changed them into small notes for me. I posted "547. Plant "drug money" (5/17)" on 5/17. Two days later, there was a news in "San Jose Mercury" that caught my eye. Topic "Field/ Prosecutor faces rare hearing". It was a rare story to discipline a D.A..
Field is a D.A. of Santa Clara County. He is accused of disobeying court orders, hiding the location of an exculpatory witness and abusing his authority in three other cases. Field was alleged that "he intentionally withheld Smith's whereabouts from the rape defendant's lawyer because he feared it would hurt his own case. When Smith was eventually located, he provided information that helped lead to dismissal of the rape charge." (San Jose Mercury, 5/24/08)
In another word, he hid evidence to frame a case. Then I think of the "drug money". I allege Feds has planted the "drug money" on me through the hands of my relatives. They knew it is a framed case, the "drug money" was not from the "drug trading". But they hide the truth at the purpose to eliminate a witness whom will endanger their criminal kingdom. They don't care to disciple a D.A. as a scapegoat in the wrong doing so long as to eliminate a target of their most wanted.
Was Field the one who gave Feds the legal advice to the framed case on me? If the case broke off, they can add another offence under the Field's name, that is convenient. What Field may get is disciplined from practicing of attorney. Or his case is just used as a cover up story to influence the public's mind that such kind of wrong doing is popular practice? What I realized is that Feds now let local D.A. office and D.E.A. do the "drug money" planting case.
On 6/12, there was another news about Field. "Prosecutor's legal woes worsen in new finding". It says "Field acted in a "deceptive and reprehensible manner" by revealing information to the jury in violation of the trial judge's order in that case." (San Jose Mercury, by Leslie Griffy, 6/12/08) New finding will drag on the disciplinary case. What I realized is that Feds will still use "drug money" to frame the case. That means they don't limit "drug money" on hundred note. They extend it to small notes.
Really, two days later, on 6/15, (it was father's day), my relatives came again and took me for another big shopping spree. Anyhow, I don't want to add another offence on Field's discipline case,
I don't touch the money my relatives gave me, even they are small notes. I believe they were from Feds. And in super markets, I found I was heavily surrounded by agents, they disguised as clients and store employees. They made that shopping day a big action day.
Not only the Field's discipline case and heavy surveillance alarmed me, also there is another news reminding me Feds is continuing to frame a case on "drug money".