Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bare Knuckled Pundit And the problem in that is what? Politics is a full-contact sport. Either take the hits or take the bench.
Should we engage in widespread self-censorship for fear that our beliefs and statements will be used for nefarious purposes?
Is it the responsibility of the media to hand-feed us pabulum and explain the nuance and meaning behind every bit of flotsam and jetsam that rises to the surface in a campaign? Rachel Maddow of Air America and MSNBC's "Countdown" thinks so. I, on the other hand, thought that was the responsibility of the paid campaign staff.
What ever became of personal responsibility and being an informed voter? If people choose not to be informed are we to send them to education and enlightenment camps?
This is satire; a great American political tradition. Perhaps everyone should lighten up and laugh once in awhile; it does wonders. |
Well this satire is giving comfort to the terrorists.
I love how people believe that censorship is ok when it is their viewpoint being supported, but are offended when it goes after their views.
If I call Pres. Bush a mouth-breathing, slack-jawed, borderline mental retard, then I am not patriotic, but if someone calls Obama a towel-headed, Islamic terrorist, it is satire??
