Quote:
Originally Posted by bhkad  You don't know this. |
More accurately, we don't know anything. As Socrates stated, "We believe much, yet know nothing."
However, we can deduce based upon the
facts what is most likely verse what is merely possible.
Quote:
You can't read the signs accurately. You wouldn't/won't admit the truth if/because it didn't/doesn't support your allegiance to Iran/Islamic extremism.
And it's "situation."
|
lol. Was that meant to be a joke?
Explain to me how Iran would use an missile that would instantly incriminate them as the aggressors. Furthermore, explain to me why they would use it against Israel when they cannot deter the US from a secondary attack. Furthermore, if you can manage to do that (extremely unlikely), explain to me why they would choose to use a delivery system that has an insane amount of Gs and shocks that would likely reduce the reliability of a crude weapon to Zero.
Iran, if it is going to nuke Israel, would do so without a missile. As stated before, all one needs is a donkey pulling a cart.
It is not my fault you do not understand the basics mechanics. In the future attacking someone who does when your understanding is in the area of the zero, is a foolish method of proving they are wrong.