Originally Posted by The Bare Knuckled Pundit

Bear in mind that a missile and a nuclear weapon are two completely different things.

While I may have a nuclear weapon, if I have to use my Jeep as the delivery system, its utility is extremely limited. In order to create a true strategic weapon one must be able to miniaturize the weapon, mate it to a missile, make it survivable so it doesn't become disabled in flight and perfect a guidance system.

Nonetheless, the Iranian missile program is a significant component of a strategic weapons program and should be taken very seriously. In addition to being a delivery system for nuclear weapons, it can also deliver conventional high explosives as well as chemical, biological and radiological payloads. Again, the last three are dependent on their weaponization and in-flight survivability, though.

Personally, I would recommend the Administration add an immediate and permanent halt to missile technology as part of the price for a comprehensive agreement with North Korea on their nuclear program. Iran has been provided significant funding in exchange for NK missile technology. The result is the Shahab 3 that was tested yesterday and plans for the Shahab 4 and 5. Intead of dealing with these matters piecemeal, perhaps a more holistic and comprehensive approach is in order.

Remember, chess was created by Persians and the regime is clearly playing a masterful game.