Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes  Please re-read my previous post, and try for comprehension.
I concede that you haven't said much that makes sense. You make vague noises about "understanding" them but since you're against the sensible solution, what exactly do you propose? |
Okay, so, I ask you to prove that "The safest societies are those united in the extermination of predators," and your "proof" is two examples of criminals you think should've been executed.
I ask you why you "debate" me by putting words in my mouth, and you counter with something which doesn't even address my question.
It's obvious that you can't defend your position and aren't interested in an actual discussion.
See you.